Looked for Toyota Tundra, found none. Typed it in again, and chose a few of the auto-completes suggested to me. No results. Looked for a F-150, no results. It's one thing to not have some of the most popular automobiles available, but quite another to not have results for something that you suggested I search for. Besides that, what is this supposed to do? If I click on one of the cars that it happens to have I get a blank page. Is this supposed to help me buy a car? See what's out there? Know fair value? I just think that someone jumped the gun on this, and it could be executed on quite a bit better
Basically, Google is trying to go after KBB, Edmunds, and to a lesser extent TrueCar/Carwoo, and hit right at the "what is a fair market price".
Given that they are saying that they are gathering the data, it probably explains why they coverage is not that good for inventory, but I'd expect that to be remedied quickly if they put sufficient resources behind it.
It should be noted that this appears to be a new car thing primarily.
Interesting. Must be in soft-launch - I get "Zip code not in the supported region." This won't be a direct Craigslist competitor as it seems to be aimed at dealer inventories.
Yep, they made this mistake with flight search also. Let everyone know about a service with crappy data, then everyone thinks it is crappy and never go back to it. Brilliant, from the minds of geniuses. It worked for Gmail because users didn't need data to begin with, but it doesn't work for services that require a lot of data to start with to be viable. And even if you have data, it better be good; ask Apple about their maps.
Looks a little half-baked – only 3 BMW M3s near Silicon Valley, and no Porsches? Otherwise, the interface looks nice, and I hope they crawl more inventory, including pre-owned.
It reminds me of the ill-fated Google Real Estate search (http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2011/01/retiring-real-est...). That said, Google was going up against strong competitors in Trulia and Zillow at the time, and there doesn't seem to be a strong competitor in the car search space.
A big problem is that the photos shown are stock photos (atleast the ones I looked at were marked as stock photos). So in a few cases, the prices don't match the photo. For instance, I looked for Honda Fit and the stock photo shows a Honda Fit Sport model which is priced a couple of K higher than the price they have against the photo.
Does anyone know what data feed they're pulling from? Or if they're pulling from one? I couldn't find a Honda Civic within 100 miles of me. My local classifieds showed 449 results for the same search -- looks like my zip isn't supported.
Suffice it to say they're going to need a better feed to search if this will ever be successful.
I was part of the team that did this: http://www.newcars.com/carchooser#1
While it requires flash, it's a lot more flexible and includes the ability to compare across makes and models.
A lot of the new products, Google tries (and aggregating sale info on cars is just one of them) is actually not ready. It is not in a state, that is really usable, or has a good UX.
But non the less, other aggregation-sites are being punished by the differend Panda-Updates, for reasons, of too less content, bad UX, et al.
So practically Google punishes sites, throws them out of the index (or a lot further back) and then builts something, they did perfectly fine - just to make money on this.
If I would have to imagine, where the data came from... well why would Google have forced the microformats and machine-readable content... OK, forget that. Sounds just too much like a conspiracy... ;-)
[+] [-] JoeCortopassi|13 years ago|reply
Looked for Toyota Tundra, found none. Typed it in again, and chose a few of the auto-completes suggested to me. No results. Looked for a F-150, no results. It's one thing to not have some of the most popular automobiles available, but quite another to not have results for something that you suggested I search for. Besides that, what is this supposed to do? If I click on one of the cars that it happens to have I get a blank page. Is this supposed to help me buy a car? See what's out there? Know fair value? I just think that someone jumped the gun on this, and it could be executed on quite a bit better
[+] [-] cloudwalking|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thecosas|13 years ago|reply
Not saying that makes it any better... just saying its not something that was launched yesterday.
[+] [-] BHSPitMonkey|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sologoub|13 years ago|reply
Basically, Google is trying to go after KBB, Edmunds, and to a lesser extent TrueCar/Carwoo, and hit right at the "what is a fair market price".
Given that they are saying that they are gathering the data, it probably explains why they coverage is not that good for inventory, but I'd expect that to be remedied quickly if they put sufficient resources behind it.
It should be noted that this appears to be a new car thing primarily.
[+] [-] sologoub|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thecosas|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] swalsh|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] erickhill|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hakaaak|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] millstone|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gojomo|13 years ago|reply
http://www.economist.com/node/21558269
Is Google currently in some spat with Germany?
[+] [-] aqme28|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] avolcano|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kirubakaran|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] notatoad|13 years ago|reply
>Our service is free to you but to operate this service, we are compensated by some of the providers.
[+] [-] thecosas|13 years ago|reply
They go to great lengths in order to make sure individual dealers play by the same rules (compliance) for this very reason.
[+] [-] timwoj|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] hornbaker|13 years ago|reply
It reminds me of the ill-fated Google Real Estate search (http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2011/01/retiring-real-est...). That said, Google was going up against strong competitors in Trulia and Zillow at the time, and there doesn't seem to be a strong competitor in the car search space.
[+] [-] grok2|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] austenallred|13 years ago|reply
Suffice it to say they're going to need a better feed to search if this will ever be successful.
[+] [-] dhosek|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sixQuarks|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] intregus|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fractalsea|13 years ago|reply
Looks like it has potential. Should be able to generalise it to other products. Looks nicer than their current search.
[+] [-] joejohnson|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] alainc|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] guard-of-terra|13 years ago|reply
A couple of teenagers with PHP could throw together something like that.
[+] [-] ajays|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Samuel_Michon|13 years ago|reply
Law enforcement officers need a warrant to do that ;)
[+] [-] vampirechicken|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bicknergseng|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sdoering|13 years ago|reply
But non the less, other aggregation-sites are being punished by the differend Panda-Updates, for reasons, of too less content, bad UX, et al.
So practically Google punishes sites, throws them out of the index (or a lot further back) and then builts something, they did perfectly fine - just to make money on this.
If I would have to imagine, where the data came from... well why would Google have forced the microformats and machine-readable content... OK, forget that. Sounds just too much like a conspiracy... ;-)
[+] [-] dotborg|13 years ago|reply