top | item 4873194

Google Car Search

94 points| kirubakaran | 13 years ago |google.com | reply

44 comments

order
[+] JoeCortopassi|13 years ago|reply
Pretty terrible search.

Looked for Toyota Tundra, found none. Typed it in again, and chose a few of the auto-completes suggested to me. No results. Looked for a F-150, no results. It's one thing to not have some of the most popular automobiles available, but quite another to not have results for something that you suggested I search for. Besides that, what is this supposed to do? If I click on one of the cars that it happens to have I get a blank page. Is this supposed to help me buy a car? See what's out there? Know fair value? I just think that someone jumped the gun on this, and it could be executed on quite a bit better

[+] cloudwalking|13 years ago|reply
Perhaps there are no Toyota Tundras for sale in your area? Both of your cited searches work fine for me (Bay Area).
[+] BHSPitMonkey|13 years ago|reply
Are you not noticing where it says "Searching within 25 miles of [your ZIP code]" on the results page?
[+] sologoub|13 years ago|reply
I find this fascinating: http://support.google.com/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&...

Basically, Google is trying to go after KBB, Edmunds, and to a lesser extent TrueCar/Carwoo, and hit right at the "what is a fair market price".

Given that they are saying that they are gathering the data, it probably explains why they coverage is not that good for inventory, but I'd expect that to be remedied quickly if they put sufficient resources behind it.

It should be noted that this appears to be a new car thing primarily.

[+] thecosas|13 years ago|reply
yep. they would likely need to get dealers to sign up for the service and share some data ala TrueCar.
[+] erickhill|13 years ago|reply
Interesting. Must be in soft-launch - I get "Zip code not in the supported region." This won't be a direct Craigslist competitor as it seems to be aimed at dealer inventories.
[+] hakaaak|13 years ago|reply
Yep, they made this mistake with flight search also. Let everyone know about a service with crappy data, then everyone thinks it is crappy and never go back to it. Brilliant, from the minds of geniuses. It worked for Gmail because users didn't need data to begin with, but it doesn't work for services that require a lot of data to start with to be viable. And even if you have data, it better be good; ask Apple about their maps.
[+] unknown|13 years ago|reply

[deleted]

[+] aqme28|13 years ago|reply
Interesting that it defaults to Acura. I wonder if money is being exchanged over that.
[+] avolcano|13 years ago|reply
Erm, probably mostly has to do with Acura being first alphabetically on the list.
[+] kirubakaran|13 years ago|reply
It was Lexus for me. I figured it must be based on some insidious profiling.
[+] notatoad|13 years ago|reply
from the bottom of the page:

>Our service is free to you but to operate this service, we are compensated by some of the providers.

[+] thecosas|13 years ago|reply
It's more than likely that manufacturers aren't too excited about this. They like having control over pricing and this removes that to some extent.

They go to great lengths in order to make sure individual dealers play by the same rules (compliance) for this very reason.

[+] timwoj|13 years ago|reply
Or it could just be that it's in alphabetical order, and defaults to the first one in the list.
[+] hornbaker|13 years ago|reply
Looks a little half-baked – only 3 BMW M3s near Silicon Valley, and no Porsches? Otherwise, the interface looks nice, and I hope they crawl more inventory, including pre-owned.

It reminds me of the ill-fated Google Real Estate search (http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2011/01/retiring-real-est...). That said, Google was going up against strong competitors in Trulia and Zillow at the time, and there doesn't seem to be a strong competitor in the car search space.

[+] grok2|13 years ago|reply
A big problem is that the photos shown are stock photos (atleast the ones I looked at were marked as stock photos). So in a few cases, the prices don't match the photo. For instance, I looked for Honda Fit and the stock photo shows a Honda Fit Sport model which is priced a couple of K higher than the price they have against the photo.
[+] austenallred|13 years ago|reply
Does anyone know what data feed they're pulling from? Or if they're pulling from one? I couldn't find a Honda Civic within 100 miles of me. My local classifieds showed 449 results for the same search -- looks like my zip isn't supported.

Suffice it to say they're going to need a better feed to search if this will ever be successful.

[+] dhosek|13 years ago|reply
I was part of the team that did this: http://www.newcars.com/carchooser#1 While it requires flash, it's a lot more flexible and includes the ability to compare across makes and models.
[+] sixQuarks|13 years ago|reply
I like it. Are you a freelancer or do you still work full-time for them?
[+] intregus|13 years ago|reply
Does anyone know if this is, or will be, powered by microformats?
[+] fractalsea|13 years ago|reply
Now we just need motorbike search.

Looks like it has potential. Should be able to generalise it to other products. Looks nicer than their current search.

[+] joejohnson|13 years ago|reply
Their database doesn't have any of the Tesla models :(
[+] alainc|13 years ago|reply
Wow, that's really bad - it only works if you're looking at one particular car! If you're comparing, or researching, they add nothing.
[+] guard-of-terra|13 years ago|reply
That's not the level of product I expect from Google.

A couple of teenagers with PHP could throw together something like that.

[+] Samuel_Michon|13 years ago|reply
"Google Car Search"

Law enforcement officers need a warrant to do that ;)

[+] vampirechicken|13 years ago|reply
"Zip code not in supported region" is not a consumer friendly error message.
[+] bicknergseng|13 years ago|reply
Strange to me that Google would put up something that clearly isn't ready.
[+] sdoering|13 years ago|reply
A lot of the new products, Google tries (and aggregating sale info on cars is just one of them) is actually not ready. It is not in a state, that is really usable, or has a good UX.

But non the less, other aggregation-sites are being punished by the differend Panda-Updates, for reasons, of too less content, bad UX, et al.

So practically Google punishes sites, throws them out of the index (or a lot further back) and then builts something, they did perfectly fine - just to make money on this.

If I would have to imagine, where the data came from... well why would Google have forced the microformats and machine-readable content... OK, forget that. Sounds just too much like a conspiracy... ;-)

[+] dotborg|13 years ago|reply
as long as they don't enforce this to search results it does not exist, but when they do that, carwoo etc. will cease to exist.