They did put the effort in to overcome those issues, only to discover that for every 80 iOS users they had 1 Android user, so they concluded that continuing to do the work wasn't justified because there was a lack of demand. If they'd had comparable demand from Android users, they'd have continued to invest.
igravious|13 years ago
rbarooah|13 years ago
See Zaheer's comment on this thread too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4991585
garuda|13 years ago
eropple|13 years ago
Uh...why? Why should they "do their part" for a platform where they have no users and don't see a likely growth of them?
I am an Android user and developer, but I am also realistic.
rbarooah|13 years ago
iOS users are not price sensitive and Apple doesn't make any pretense that content is free. People who buy into the Apple world are choosing to buy into an ecosystem where they are going to have to buy content from a collection of proprietary 'Stores'. Apple is well known for the iTunes store and the App store so it's a conscious choice for their users.
Most Android devices (obviously not the highest end ones) are sold on price, and Google as a brand is known for providing free, advertising supported content. It's no great surprise that people who choose that ecosystem expect to get free stuff and don't want to be buying a lot of digital content.
If they'd wanted that they'd have bought an iOS device.