[eurodance]

Am I the only one who doesn't understand why he resigned if he is innocent, as he claims?

[DannyBee]

Because when you are a high level executive at a company, part of what you are being paid for is understanding you need to protect the company above your job.

I'm not talking about fraud here, or things like that. I'm talking about when you get into a situation which can only cause the company harm and embarrassment, the generally appropriate thing to do is remove your link to the company.

If he was a random employee, sure, they don't pay you to do that, but executives, yeah, this is one of the reasons they are paid well.

I'm sure he also holds enough options/stock that he has a financial incentive to not cause the company financial trouble through his alleged personal indiscretions.

[RaphiePS]

Quoting from his blog post above (http://keithrabois.tumblr.com/post/41463189288/a-note-from-k...): "I decided to resign from Square so my colleagues could continue to do great work without the distraction that a lawsuit would most certainly bring."

[DannyBee]

If Square was also sued, it's still going to be a huge distraction (large number of emails produced, employees deposed, etc) unless they settled.

If he was sued personally, but Square was not, then yes, cutting this link probably would help.

[gojomo]

At the same time as Rabois asserts innocence with regard to legal offenses, his statement on Tumblr says, "I realize that continuing any physical relationship after he began working at Square was poor judgment on my part."

This is consistent with the Square statement: "While we have not found evidence to support any claims, Keith exercised poor judgment that ultimately undermined his ability to remain an effective leader at Square."

In other words, both Square and Rabois suggest that what transpired was an error in judgement which would complicate things if he continued at Square, but not legally actionable. Since both Rabois and Square can continue independently, minimizing the complications with a resignation can make sense even if completely 'innocent' of legally-enforceable damages.

[davidtyleryork]

Based on the last line of his post, it looks like he was working on his own startup anyway. While the timing is suspicious, I think he might have felt that a clean break was the best solution to a situation where no one wins.

[chollida1]

It's extremely doubtful that square would have allowed him to stay.

I'm guessing they offered him the choice of resign and possibly vest a few more options or not resign and be fired by square.