God forbid you want to save the data for personal archival or bulk digital analysis. If they allowed that you might defeat the museums careful control and curation of the data and potentially even use it in ways they don't agree with!
One of the greatest treasures of Western scholarship has been made available for the public to view at their leisure, in such stunning high resolution that you can zoom into the very grain of the paper.
Absolutely anyone with a web browser can instantly access what was once available only to a select few scholars, and even then only under the least convenient of circumstances.
A mere handful of years ago, the only way the average person would have even seen one of Leonardo da Vinci's notebooks would be in a museum display, assuming they knew of the display, had the wherewithal to visit, and the resources to get there if it wasn't in their own city.
Now, the British Museum has made literally hundreds of priceless manuscripts, from da Vinci to Beowulf, available to even the most casual reader who happens to click on a link, thanks to their careful preservation, curation, and digitization, all at no cost to the viewer.
What's the response? Complaining.
"Yes, fine, but I wanted to _download_ it, not just see it!"
Didn't Wikipedia decide similar terms were just scary legal BS and download all the high resolution images of public domain scans from another museum's website anyway?
Did they really place a stamp of the British Museum on every page of this priceless historical artifact? I'm not being facetious, I was honestly surprised to see that.
He wrote latin and that too right to left (that was drm) if that helps anyone here. Of course, it's just easier to check out the commentary on than his actual work.
I visited the Da Vinci museum in Florence, Italy, and Da Vinci was far ahead of his time, inventing the idea of the helicopter, bicycle, parachute, machine gun, scuba, and many others. A true genius. Oh, he also painted the Mona Lisa, probably the most famous painting of all time.
[+] [-] nullc|13 years ago|reply
:P
[+] [-] jaysonelliot|13 years ago|reply
Absolutely anyone with a web browser can instantly access what was once available only to a select few scholars, and even then only under the least convenient of circumstances.
A mere handful of years ago, the only way the average person would have even seen one of Leonardo da Vinci's notebooks would be in a museum display, assuming they knew of the display, had the wherewithal to visit, and the resources to get there if it wasn't in their own city.
Now, the British Museum has made literally hundreds of priceless manuscripts, from da Vinci to Beowulf, available to even the most casual reader who happens to click on a link, thanks to their careful preservation, curation, and digitization, all at no cost to the viewer.
What's the response? Complaining. "Yes, fine, but I wanted to _download_ it, not just see it!"
Yup, this is the Internet, alright.
[+] [-] Lifescape|13 years ago|reply
Looks like the format is:
Pages work in this fashion: f001r, f001v, f002r, f002v, f003r, f003v, ... and ends at f283v.At resolution 14, columns range from 0 to 33 and rows range from 0 to 24.
Edit: I hacked together a python script to download all images at resolution 14 https://gist.github.com/L1fescape/4761013
Now to figure out how to combine them all...
[+] [-] unimpressive|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ZeroGravitas|13 years ago|reply
http://boingboing.net/2009/07/20/uk-national-portrait.html
[+] [-] namank|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sakopov|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slavak|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bwooce|13 years ago|reply
The clueless idiot that got their stamp pad out that day is probably long retired or dead.
That big black stamp on page 2 doesn't look original either though, to be fair."ex dono" = as gift.
[+] [-] ernestFlyweight|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] namank|13 years ago|reply
He wrote latin and that too right to left (that was drm) if that helps anyone here. Of course, it's just easier to check out the commentary on than his actual work.
[+] [-] joshuaheard|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sheri|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] davidw|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rtpg|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] willvarfar|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] leoh|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eulo|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]