I know it's a bit superstitious, but the basic idea is that when a company starts building temples to itself and its employees, that means their focus has shifted and their eye is getting off the ball.
I hope it's not the case with any of these companies, and I know there are plenty of counter-examples, but still, I think about this.
Interesting. Apple is doing 'great' but the stock market (1) disagrees so almost by definition it isn't doing good. Investors see clouds in the horizon and don't want to look at the $50 billion they might make in profit this year. Is Apple going to grow by 10 to 20% a year?
Google reported huge revenue increases and the stock is on fire but not because of new ventures or customers, they just added even more ads to the pages. That's not sustainable and when that happens it has a lot of falling to do. http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=goog . Virtually all their money is still from ads.
Edit: 1. I think all this hype on stocks is a pump-and-dump operation, played by the big investment banks. "They" buy lots of shares, start the fire with $1000 price targets from their own analysts and when the price is high enough, they dump it, leaving some retail investor holding the bag. Google went from mid $500s to $800 in a few months
I don't think that would have been well received. Locals would have decried that SF gov 'gives in' to big corp at the expense of the local population (i.e. not creating jobs many locals could fill and that land that could be used for affordable housing was being bid up by big corp) and probably would have added that not many from the Bayview would have benefitted directly. That's SF politics. People want the clean baby without the bathwater.
Lowes+HomeDepot (HD started but bailed and Lowes took over) went thru some idiotic approval process to build their Bayshore location --about 12 or more years after Goodman Lumber closed its doors.
I wonder if it will have flood doors to contain the rising sea waters :-)
This is a pretty cool concept drawing. At one time there was a suggestion for Google to run a hovercraft or hydrofoil type ferry from the GooglePlex to San Francisco. This will make that easier!
That said I was expecting something to happen, I mean Apple has a spaceship, these guys needed to pupate out of the dead husk of SGI and spread their wings!
I can't understand why the big players like Facebook and Google are not building somewhere like South San Francisco. Most of the employees either live in San Francisco or want to, and the difference in real estate pricing could easily be offset by eliminating half the bus fleet.
I disagree, they're in an ideal location for people from both SF and down to San Jose and Fremont.
That gives their employees a whole lot more choice for housing and makes it more attractive. Every time I see a company that's in SF offering jobs I shudder at the travel time from the valley. It's wonderful if you've already got a place in SF but makes anyone think twice about joining a company when they consider the crazy living costs in SF.
I don't think that statement that most of the employees either live in SF or want to is necessarily true and may only be true if you think of those under 30 or are recent college grads. Many folks want to own a home or raise a family outside of the city since it's very cost prohibitive to own or rent in San Francisco.
The argument against South San Francisco is that if you're going to build to be closer to San Francisco, then you should make it easily accessible to SF employees. That means it should be a MUNI ride away so you can get to it from anywhere in the city otherwise you're going to either have to drive or deal with a multi-transfer commute. I would suggest the DogPatch or Mission Bay given the access to CalTrain (as a connector to Mountain View HQ) and the availability of large swaths of warehouses or vacant land.
Does anybody know if the plan is to build atop the Shoreline Preserve in Mountain View? That seems to be the only large parcel of land that is both closer to the bay than Google already is and not currently occupied by other structures. Seems a shame to wipe out a hefty chunk of a nature preserve simply to satisfy a corporation's desire for self-idolatry.
The most beautiful office I've ever seen is that of ILM in the Presidio... about where Starfleet Academy is supposed to get built. ;) They have a "cafeteria" overlooking the Golden Gate, Bay, forest, etc.
I was about to correct you and state that Starfleet Academy was (will be?) located in Sausalito north of the Golden Gate Bridge... but I was wrong! <:)
Starfleet Academy's HQ was in the Presidio, but the Academy's training facility was in Sausalito.
This is a misquote in the NW title; the original Vanity Fair article states "The new campus, which the company is calling Bay View, consists of nine roughly similar structures, most of which will be four stories high, and all of which are shaped like rectangles that have been bent in the middle."
Not sure if it applies in this instance but some customs have it so the ground floor is not counted and the second floor is referred to as the first and so on.
[+] [-] nlh|13 years ago|reply
http://www.businessinsider.com/poorly-timed-headquarters-200...
I know it's a bit superstitious, but the basic idea is that when a company starts building temples to itself and its employees, that means their focus has shifted and their eye is getting off the ball.
I hope it's not the case with any of these companies, and I know there are plenty of counter-examples, but still, I think about this.
[+] [-] OGinparadise|13 years ago|reply
Google reported huge revenue increases and the stock is on fire but not because of new ventures or customers, they just added even more ads to the pages. That's not sustainable and when that happens it has a lot of falling to do. http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=goog . Virtually all their money is still from ads.
Edit: 1. I think all this hype on stocks is a pump-and-dump operation, played by the big investment banks. "They" buy lots of shares, start the fire with $1000 price targets from their own analysts and when the price is high enough, they dump it, leaving some retail investor holding the bag. Google went from mid $500s to $800 in a few months
[+] [-] mmanfrin|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mc32|13 years ago|reply
Lowes+HomeDepot (HD started but bailed and Lowes took over) went thru some idiotic approval process to build their Bayshore location --about 12 or more years after Goodman Lumber closed its doors.
[+] [-] stanleydrew|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cpeterso|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] infinityetc|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ChuckMcM|13 years ago|reply
This is a pretty cool concept drawing. At one time there was a suggestion for Google to run a hovercraft or hydrofoil type ferry from the GooglePlex to San Francisco. This will make that easier!
That said I was expecting something to happen, I mean Apple has a spaceship, these guys needed to pupate out of the dead husk of SGI and spread their wings!
[+] [-] Inufu|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dsl|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DannyBee|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] c4urself|13 years ago|reply
That gives their employees a whole lot more choice for housing and makes it more attractive. Every time I see a company that's in SF offering jobs I shudder at the travel time from the valley. It's wonderful if you've already got a place in SF but makes anyone think twice about joining a company when they consider the crazy living costs in SF.
[+] [-] calbear81|13 years ago|reply
The argument against South San Francisco is that if you're going to build to be closer to San Francisco, then you should make it easily accessible to SF employees. That means it should be a MUNI ride away so you can get to it from anywhere in the city otherwise you're going to either have to drive or deal with a multi-transfer commute. I would suggest the DogPatch or Mission Bay given the access to CalTrain (as a connector to Mountain View HQ) and the availability of large swaths of warehouses or vacant land.
[+] [-] brudgers|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rdl|13 years ago|reply
That would drop Palo Alto real estate from $5-7 to maybe $3-5.
[+] [-] nthitz|13 years ago|reply
I must be confused, but what does any of this have to do with NASA?
[+] [-] GauntletWizard|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ejdyksen|13 years ago|reply
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moffett_Federal_Airfield
[+] [-] paulsowden|13 years ago|reply
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2008/08_51AR....
The bayview land is here: http://goo.gl/maps/PY8UD
(Source: http://laserfiche.mountainview.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=5...)
[+] [-] jedc|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] brudgers|13 years ago|reply
The singularity does not intend to remain Earthbound?
[+] [-] emelski|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mixmastamyk|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cpeterso|13 years ago|reply
Starfleet Academy's HQ was in the Presidio, but the Academy's training facility was in Sausalito.
[+] [-] kdsudac|13 years ago|reply
Easter egg or nice place to catch a nap?
[+] [-] rogerbinns|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] paulsowden|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pests|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dyno12345|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hythloday|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikeyouse|13 years ago|reply
https://maps.google.com/maps?saddr=Unknown+road&daddr=Cr...
It's likely that the land that Google is planning on expanding onto is either owned by NASA or adjacent to their facility.
[+] [-] moe|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eclipxe|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zura|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bbvup|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]