Interesting. The toggle from "alpha" to "euro" seemed like a neat feature at first, but it's of course completely un-suited to fast typing.
Likewise, compartmentalizing typing into various groups (alphabetic chars, accented chars, capitalized chars, symbols, punctuation, etc.) is logical, but mostly incompatible with just about any modern keyboard workflow.
edit : after doing some further reading, I realize I was judging it based on a completely incorrect set of criteria. It's intended purpose was for non typists, single-hand typing or "environments where conventional two-handed keyboarding does not work" [1]
> edit : after doing some further reading, I realize I was judging it based on a completely incorrect set of criteria. It's intended purpose was for non typists, single-hand typing or "environments where conventional two-handed keyboarding does not work"
Though even by these criteria it's poorly suited for any language not completely served by ISO-8859-1 (and some languages that even 8859-1 is sufficient for). This includes a number of European languages.
Is there anything particularly interesting or useful about this keyboard design, or is it simply because it was designed by Crockford that makes it deserve mention? Aside from unsuitable for touch-typing, it looks like a common sense way to do it.
The "Done" button is a toggle? Is that a side effect of this being a proof of concept, or was there some extra functionality in mind?
Edit:
Answering my own question, since it looks like this was designed for touch/pen based input, it would probably hide the keyboard: http://www.crockford.com/wrrrld/keyboard.html
I can't see the point of this keyboard but if it is a good thing to have the letters run from a-z starting from the top-left it seems like the numbers should start with 1(or 0) on the top-left as well.
Really? I guess I'm more used to shitty smartphone keyboards but that was relatively painless. You only had to go to the "standard" symbols button twice.
[+] [-] doktrin|13 years ago|reply
Likewise, compartmentalizing typing into various groups (alphabetic chars, accented chars, capitalized chars, symbols, punctuation, etc.) is logical, but mostly incompatible with just about any modern keyboard workflow.
edit : after doing some further reading, I realize I was judging it based on a completely incorrect set of criteria. It's intended purpose was for non typists, single-hand typing or "environments where conventional two-handed keyboarding does not work" [1]
[1] http://www.crockford.com/wrrrld/keyboard.html
[+] [-] jarek|13 years ago|reply
Though even by these criteria it's poorly suited for any language not completely served by ISO-8859-1 (and some languages that even 8859-1 is sufficient for). This includes a number of European languages.
[+] [-] Shorel|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cjfont|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DanBC|13 years ago|reply
I'm not sure about having t, n, s on the weaker fingers.
[+] [-] JGM564|13 years ago|reply
Edit: Answering my own question, since it looks like this was designed for touch/pen based input, it would probably hide the keyboard: http://www.crockford.com/wrrrld/keyboard.html
[+] [-] MilesTeg|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DannoHung|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jgv|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] randomenduser|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Natsu|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] notjustanymike|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jaredmcateer|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pmk|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] largesse|13 years ago|reply