top | item 5328448 (no title) compilercreator | 13 years ago Don't disagree with you overall, but I do have one nitpicl. There is nothing proprietary about the Boost license. Boost license is quite similar to MIT license. discuss order hn newest rodgerd|13 years ago Perhaps I'm misreading what appears to be the Mir license block:GNU GPL v3, GNU LGPL v3, MIT / X / Expat Licence, Other/Open Source (Boost Software License - Version 1.0) Commercial subscription expires 2022-09-24 mseebach|13 years ago What is there to misread? Boost Software License is there?https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html :Boost Software License (#boost) This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL.
rodgerd|13 years ago Perhaps I'm misreading what appears to be the Mir license block:GNU GPL v3, GNU LGPL v3, MIT / X / Expat Licence, Other/Open Source (Boost Software License - Version 1.0) Commercial subscription expires 2022-09-24 mseebach|13 years ago What is there to misread? Boost Software License is there?https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html :Boost Software License (#boost) This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL.
mseebach|13 years ago What is there to misread? Boost Software License is there?https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html :Boost Software License (#boost) This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL.
rodgerd|13 years ago
GNU GPL v3, GNU LGPL v3, MIT / X / Expat Licence, Other/Open Source (Boost Software License - Version 1.0) Commercial subscription expires 2022-09-24
mseebach|13 years ago
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html :
Boost Software License (#boost) This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL.