Anyone know where the recorded content is stored, and whether it's kept segregated from other cached content? This could be a really interesting archival format...
It doesn't record where you click or what you open, just every request as it moves over the wire.
I am getting quite different results - it records http requests and user input (keyboard/mouse).
Windows 7 x64, Chrome 25.0.1364.172 m :
# navigate to chrome directory
cd C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\Application\
# run chrome with a new profile
chrome --user-data-dir="../User Data/recording_test" --first-run --record-mode
# use the new chrome profile to browse around
# close chrome
# launch it in playback mode
chrome --user-data-dir="../User Data/recording_test" --playback-mode
# watch disaster ensue as it locks your mouse (not keyboard),
# replays all activity (url bar input, navigation, mouse cursor movements...),
# and doesn't even stop when you alt-tab
# to a different application
It feels unpolished - mouse scroll wasn't recorded, the "translate this page?" bar wasn't showing up the same way as in the recording, and most importantly, I managed to switch to a different application and it continued sending input to that application. HTTP requests did get cached as promised, and non-cached requests (due to missing scroll event, it clicked on a different link) resulted in a cache error.
I thought Chrome could record your navigation actions .e.g input URL and click elements, it turned out to be directly cache of URL contents so you could read from cache later...
Anyway, cool concept, except it doesn't work with X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff, or ajax call with timestamp parameters.
Not really, if I understand correctly this is capturing only the requests, "caching" them in a way, so when on playback mode if you do an action that fires this request, it's fetched from the recorded store.
I think its use is limited to what the article suggests: making sure real life demos don't break.
If you're going to go to the trouble of running something from the terminal (even if you save time with a bash/batch script), why would you prefer this over Selenium? With Selenium you can customize the actions, extend using your favorite language (such as adding pauses or pulling inputs from a database), and if you use Firefox, you can get the same recording ability (only you can save the file and can extend via JavaScript)
Selenium solves a different problem. With selenium, you record user actions, and verify properties about the state of the site.
The record/playback feature is designed to make a copy of the content you look at during a session, allowing you to retrieve it offline at a later time by revisiting the page (or making equivalent HTTP calls).
Interestingly, if you use both together, you can design a offline-mode reader for hacker news for use on the train or other disconnected environments. Or, combine selenium and playback mode to create kick ass demos that are less likely to fail on weak wifi networks. :)
[+] [-] gojomo|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] inafield|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ryankshaw|13 years ago|reply
something like open -a "Google Chrome" --args --record-mode --output-file output.log
then: some-command-that-plays-it-back --infile output.log
does anyone know if something like that exists?
[+] [-] JoachimSchipper|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] j_s|13 years ago|reply
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8806625/is-it-possible-to...
[edit] Also:
Random perl script: https://github.com/inno/pluck-har
Google's record/playback Chrome extension: http://code.google.com/p/bite-project/
[+] [-] lincolnbryant|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jonny_eh|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DCoder|13 years ago|reply
I am getting quite different results - it records http requests and user input (keyboard/mouse).
Windows 7 x64, Chrome 25.0.1364.172 m :
It feels unpolished - mouse scroll wasn't recorded, the "translate this page?" bar wasn't showing up the same way as in the recording, and most importantly, I managed to switch to a different application and it continued sending input to that application. HTTP requests did get cached as promised, and non-cached requests (due to missing scroll event, it clicked on a different link) resulted in a cache error.[+] [-] mickdarling|13 years ago|reply
I JUST dealt with bad data speeds at SXSW while demoing for @scobleizer so this would have been great for the future.
[+] [-] est|13 years ago|reply
Anyway, cool concept, except it doesn't work with X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff, or ajax call with timestamp parameters.
[+] [-] ErikRogneby|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Mahn|13 years ago|reply
I think its use is limited to what the article suggests: making sure real life demos don't break.
[+] [-] andrewaylett|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Neepy|13 years ago|reply
start /b "" "C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe" --args --record-mode
doesn't seem to work
[+] [-] snarfy|13 years ago|reply
2. run chrome.exe --record-mode ( /record-mode also works)
3. navigate in a predetermined way, then close chrome
4. run chrome.exe --playback-mode ( /playback-mode also works)
5. navigate in the same predetermined way. Those clicks will all work. Any other clicks will not work and result in 'cache miss' errors.
[+] [-] zackbloom|13 years ago|reply
start /b "" "C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe" --record-mode
Report back if it works!
[+] [-] DCoder|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bdcravens|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ffk|13 years ago|reply
The record/playback feature is designed to make a copy of the content you look at during a session, allowing you to retrieve it offline at a later time by revisiting the page (or making equivalent HTTP calls).
Interestingly, if you use both together, you can design a offline-mode reader for hacker news for use on the train or other disconnected environments. Or, combine selenium and playback mode to create kick ass demos that are less likely to fail on weak wifi networks. :)
[+] [-] j_s|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] uptown|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jakub_g|13 years ago|reply
1 is a size in bytes (must be >0).
[+] [-] MikeKusold|13 years ago|reply
Then there is a setting to disable cache. Although I have heard reports that it doesn't completely work, but that might have been fixed by now.
[+] [-] bthomas|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nsoun|13 years ago|reply
Thanks for the heads-up!