Sometimes the mind boggles how companies like Google or Apple with its iMessages, who have all the ducks in a row, are so slow to capitalize on these things.
WhatsApp and most clones are pretty terrible, it is used solely because of network effects. But apparently two years is quick enough to reach escape velocity and lock it in. They are likely to get that billion.
Why exactly is WhatsApp terrible? I've been using it for about 6months and it works perfectly. Low memory usage, low disk space usage, low cpu usage, messages go through instantly and reliably. What more do you want in a messaging app?
That would make for a very nice middle finger to Facebook if they pull this off (allegedly they attempted to acquire WhatsApp before)
But $1 billion? I'm not sure if that evaluation is entirely justified. It has a pretty large user base, granted, but there's practically nothing that warrants people will continue using it in the next 5 years.
Outside of the US WhatsApp rules with an iron fist. Every non-tech person I know uses it. I hear it dropped in casual conversation at the table next to me in restaurants. It's got a public mindshare greater than Skype. And once all your friends are on it, it's not so easy to switch.
If they're genuinely doing $100M revenue a year, it's not far off: you'd assume that they could grow a bit more, and maybe raise subs a little bit, and suddenly they're a $0.5B/yr company, without having done much work.
I would be amazed if they're doing $100M/yr but who knows.
It probably isn't just like Instagram wasn't but companies like WhatsApp like to play hard ball and negotiate higher bids because they know they're in demand and Google would rather overpay to gain an advantage then starting from scratch. Google talk isn't used much!
The number of people who use whatsapp is very high even in my not so techie circle of acquaintances in a developing country. Not to mention it has direct access to all the phone books of every user along with their very real name and other info. This is more of an asset that cannot be converted into money directly (or indirectly legally at least)
What's App is huge in India. The standard term here is "Whatsapp me". I almost stopped using sms & almost entirely use whatsapp. Simple and clutter free.
One thing that worries me with Google's purchase is the ads. Google will want to introduce while I would prefer to pay the annual fee and keep it ad free. Let's hope that doesn't happen.
At least here in Bolivia, literally every single person I've talked to that owns a smartphone uses WhatsApp to communicate.
Not even Facebook messenger, but WhatsApp specifically. It _completely_ obliterated BBPin when Blackberry was more in use, but since Android picked up a lot of marketshare here with Samsung's Galaxy line it's dropped out of the radar.
WhatsApp just like Instagram is too valuable as a brand. I expect that WhatsApp will be managed very much like YouTube in that it will remain independent and will be slowly integrated in the Google ecosystem over time so that people recognize it as a Google service.
I don't think this should be on the front page. It's a rumor, citing "sources". It's not credible, even less when they cite Google Babble as a rumor. For those who don't know, Babble was a fake made by a spanish forum called Forocoches [1] [2]
Well if they can't buy whatsapp because they are asking for too much, they should buy LINE or whoever is next in line (no pun intended) with the biggest network of users, and is still growing fast. The strategy of buying one of these companies out to catch-up to iMessage in user base (not counting Gtalk users) is a sound one.
But whoever it's going to be and whatever Google is going to use, can we get OTR encryption enabled by default in there? Google doesn't need to have access to people's private conversations after all - right?
Congrats Google: you're trying to buy an app as its going down. Practically everyone in Asia has switched to Line, and WhatsApp is definitely not what it was last year.
Would this acquisition just serve to take it out of the market? Google already has a text-messaging (a better one) with Google Voice. I ditched my $20/month texting plan a few months back and have been quite pleased, especially with my ability to open my texts in a browser and use a physical keyboard.
Granted, the privacy is completely nonexistant; my texts might as well be on my facebook wall. But that doesn't really bother me.
This scary me a little bit. Most of my friends have Whatsapp across different platforms and it would be a shame to find out that Google would shutdown the project in favor of GTalk
You mean Microsoft? Skype belongs to them for quite some time now.
Edit: Not sure why the downvote, Skype does belong to Microsoft, and for Skype to go after WhatsApp now would mean Microsoft has to actively pursue it, which given their track record of acquisitions seems a bit unlikely as opposed to Skype independently doing acquisitions.
i don't see how it makes any sense for samsung. they're a hardware company, and the only way an app drives hardware sales is if it is exclusive. if you make whatsapp exclusive to samsung devices, you take away all of its value.
[+] [-] recuter|13 years ago|reply
WhatsApp and most clones are pretty terrible, it is used solely because of network effects. But apparently two years is quick enough to reach escape velocity and lock it in. They are likely to get that billion.
[+] [-] shawabawa3|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kashif|13 years ago|reply
Disclaimer: I am the lead dev for the android product.
[+] [-] joelhaasnoot|13 years ago|reply
I manage an large piece of software with a GUI that runs on a locked down Linux workstation. WhatsApp is how I get "screenshots" of problems.
[+] [-] anizan|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Mahn|13 years ago|reply
But $1 billion? I'm not sure if that evaluation is entirely justified. It has a pretty large user base, granted, but there's practically nothing that warrants people will continue using it in the next 5 years.
[+] [-] rubyrescue|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ealexhudson|13 years ago|reply
I would be amazed if they're doing $100M/yr but who knows.
[+] [-] sthkr|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Achshar|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] slaxman|13 years ago|reply
One thing that worries me with Google's purchase is the ads. Google will want to introduce while I would prefer to pay the annual fee and keep it ad free. Let's hope that doesn't happen.
[+] [-] omonra|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rubyrescue|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] justhw|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sergiotapia|13 years ago|reply
Not even Facebook messenger, but WhatsApp specifically. It _completely_ obliterated BBPin when Blackberry was more in use, but since Android picked up a lot of marketshare here with Samsung's Galaxy line it's dropped out of the radar.
[+] [-] DasIch|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Havoc|13 years ago|reply
Unless they screw it up themselves they aren't going to lose that head start. Not with the kind of network effects at play here.
[+] [-] nobodyshere|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joelhaasnoot|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] signa11|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gjulianm|13 years ago|reply
[1] http://www.adslzone.net/article11194-google-babble-rumor-ori... (spanish) [2] http://www.androidauthority.com/leaked-google-babble-screens...
[+] [-] applecore|13 years ago|reply
http://blog.whatsapp.com/index.php/2012/06/why-we-dont-sell-...
[+] [-] mtgx|13 years ago|reply
But whoever it's going to be and whatever Google is going to use, can we get OTR encryption enabled by default in there? Google doesn't need to have access to people's private conversations after all - right?
[+] [-] maguay|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] intopieces|13 years ago|reply
Granted, the privacy is completely nonexistant; my texts might as well be on my facebook wall. But that doesn't really bother me.
[+] [-] pmelendez|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pasbesoin|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] QuantumDoja|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Mahn|13 years ago|reply
Edit: Not sure why the downvote, Skype does belong to Microsoft, and for Skype to go after WhatsApp now would mean Microsoft has to actively pursue it, which given their track record of acquisitions seems a bit unlikely as opposed to Skype independently doing acquisitions.
[+] [-] badclient|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mtgx|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] notatoad|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kevinwdavid|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] skrebbel|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LockeWatts|13 years ago|reply