There are several billion people for which that's significant, whether because of where they live, or their age, or access to credit cards to make purchases online easily. $10 more than doubles the minimum cost of having a website on your own domain.
I think this is what's going to drive the adoption of DNSSEC: free, DNS-validated SSL certs.
IPv6 should address the other problem - namely, that SSL certs are per-ip, not per-hostname, which makes hosting multiple sites a pain with IPv4. Or SNI could work, once Windows XP is truly abandoned.
They're also a PITA to setup.
A lot of amateur webmasters have only just figured out FTP and wordpress. The whole CSR , key gen ritual is another big barrier.
> Why would I want to pay if there is alternatives offering the same product at no cost?
Because free isn't necessarily a sustainable model given the current CA environment. Any server can generate its own certificate, but this does little to verify the identity of the server you are connecting to.
My point is that CA's provide a service that can't reliably be accomplished for free (yet - the CA model has many of its own issues). If you can find one for free, I would be lead to ask "what are their motives for providing this service to me?"
dangrossman|13 years ago
why-el|13 years ago
duskwuff|13 years ago
cdjk|13 years ago
IPv6 should address the other problem - namely, that SSL certs are per-ip, not per-hostname, which makes hosting multiple sites a pain with IPv4. Or SNI could work, once Windows XP is truly abandoned.
simoncion|13 years ago
jiggy2011|13 years ago
dangoldin|13 years ago
nwh|13 years ago
If I wasn't at least a little bit clever with my spending, I would have a lot more difficulty paying my rent.
Why would I want to pay if there is alternatives offering the same product at no cost?
dkokelley|13 years ago
Because free isn't necessarily a sustainable model given the current CA environment. Any server can generate its own certificate, but this does little to verify the identity of the server you are connecting to.
My point is that CA's provide a service that can't reliably be accomplished for free (yet - the CA model has many of its own issues). If you can find one for free, I would be lead to ask "what are their motives for providing this service to me?"