Since Knowledge graph is a team, not a division that may actually be the case since it's possible the author actually meant "Google Knowledge", which is the catch all internal unit for all of Google's search-related products (of which News is a part).
'Interested' is a hard to prove word. The best one can really say without statements from Google VIPs is that acquisitions frequently do not seem to lead to successful services and so they're probably better seen as either expensive acquihires or gambling on hits.
(I have an in-progress analysis of Google service/product shutdowns at http://www.gwern.net/Google%20shutdowns and one of the solider looking results so far is that even being generous and marking as 'alive' any acqusition's products which were merged into something like Maps or Google+, products which were part of an acquisition are much more likely to be shutdown than internally-developed products.)
Crunchbase says Wavii only has five employees and only took ~$2MM in funding. So, I would bet it's more than $100K total. The funding is all listed as a 2010-07 seed round. I expect they raised more than that. But, given their acquisition price and business model it sounds like things worked on well for them and at least the founders were well vested. Or, did you mean actual cash excluding any GOOG options/RSUs?
My understanding is that a 4 year lock-in for non-execs (techies) is a standard requirement by Google during acquisitions. I've heard of some people negotiating it down to 3. But, almost everyone I know got 4.
[+] [-] agscala|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] drakaal|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mandeepj|13 years ago|reply
They laid down the whole plan on the paper to get bought so easily. Ideally this is what it takes rest is up to us...how we execute it.
[+] [-] swohns|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Shooti|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] salimmadjd|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MojoJolo|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bshastry|13 years ago|reply
[1] http://thenextweb.com/apps/2011/09/02/google-closes-aardvark...
[+] [-] gwern|13 years ago|reply
(I have an in-progress analysis of Google service/product shutdowns at http://www.gwern.net/Google%20shutdowns and one of the solider looking results so far is that even being generous and marking as 'alive' any acqusition's products which were merged into something like Maps or Google+, products which were part of an acquisition are much more likely to be shutdown than internally-developed products.)
[+] [-] micheleg|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jreichhold|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] waterlesscloud|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] njohnw|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] dfbrown|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rozap|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] brendano|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ttrreeww|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vabmit|13 years ago|reply
My understanding is that a 4 year lock-in for non-execs (techies) is a standard requirement by Google during acquisitions. I've heard of some people negotiating it down to 3. But, almost everyone I know got 4.