There seems to be some confusion here in the comments. Atlassian did not make tig, Jonas Fonseca (https://github.com/jonas) did. In some sense though, it makes Atlassian even more awesome that they wrote a blog post about a piece of software they didn't create.
I noticed that as well. If anything, it earns my respect. It shows that Atlassian, and the developers behind their products, realize that everyone has different needs. That a single tool can't solve everything for everyone. I also think it means that the tools they do build will be better, because instead of trying to include the kitchen sink, each tool has an opinion on how to best achieve what it's trying to achieve.
Looks cool! One little nitpick: "Vim to your Emacs"... Er, maybe Vim to your Eclipse. I don't know if I'd put Emacs in the same camp as Firefox or (heaven forbid) Outlook.
I love magit. I think magit-status is probably the most used command in my emacs log. Or at least the most used buffer. What I like most is that it doesn't try to simplify or hide git's workflow too much like some other gui's do.
The description of the status display is almost exactly what happens when you type ":Gstatus" while you are editing a file under a git repository in vim, if you have the fugitive plugin installed. If you use vim, you might be interested in this - there is some extra smoothness you get when you don't have to leave your editor.
Nice, Atlassian continues to make my job much much easier in regards to Git. I love the work they've done on SourceTree, which was a promising and pretty app but very unstable before they bought it. It was hard to use it for critical work because it was crashing quite frequently. Now it's rock solid and I use it almost every day. I do know most of the command line tools but I like using a GUI because it makes my repo better when I have a visual overview of everything that's going on. It helps me group commits in logical order and I've reduced the amount of basically meaningless fixes and style commits greatly.
I'd never even heard of Tig but I am already in love after about 5 minutes of usage. I'm comfortable with the Git CL and if you toss Git log enough flags, it gives you a very nice printout, but you can't actually DO anything there. This is a nice solution when you're working on a remote server but I'd also bet that if SourceTree is not open, I'm going to find myself more and more dropping into Tig rather than using SourceTree.
Otherwise, tig is neat.
I personally won't have to do `git lga` + copy commit's SHA1 + `git show COPIED_SHA1` anymore.
The thing it lacks imo, is more VI-style shortcuts (such as "gg" and "G"), displaying the SHA1 of each commit, and a feature to copy the hash of a specific commit.
Fellow Mac user here... Have you tried homebrew? I had been using MacPorts until someone told me "Homebrew is far faster." And indeed, installing something on MP takes me ages, while on homebrew it's a matter of seconds
No fussing around with your mouse, or alt-tabbing to another window, or waiting for a JVM to start. It’s there at your fingertips whenever you need it. It literally loads the 50,000 commits of the JIRA codebase in a fraction of a second.
And:
In short, it is the mutt to your Outlook, the Vim to your Emacs, the w3m to your Firefox.
The author doesn't like that it is written in tcl/tk. I have no idea how this would matter at all unless he plans on modifying the source. I happen to like gitk and use it often. What language it's implemented is of little concern to me. At one time I used tig(it is pretty old at this point), but it never really caught on for me. Perhaps I didn't give it enough of a chane, perhaps it's much better now.
Is there any reason SmartGit doesn't get more love? I've been using it for over a year now and much prefer it over every other git client I've ever used (and I've tried a lot)
http://www.syntevo.com/smartgithg/index.html
I haven't tried most of the alternatives mentioned on this page. I primarily use:
[a] the command line.
[b] git gui, (occasionally) for reviewing commits.
[c] meld, for all merge and diff-related tasks.
[d] gitk, pretty much only for viewing the history of a specific file.
[e] SmartGit, for cherry-picking and anything more complicated than my memory can handle.
There are very few times that I would not prefer using a GUI, when the alternative would be typing all or part of a hash. The hash is for machine consumption, not human consumption: let the machine deal with it. To that particular end, I have found SmartGit to be excellent, and would recommend it.
Re: complaints about GUI tools: Someone is going to have to tell me why you would be using git via a remote ssh session instead of having a local copy. I am sure there is a logical scenario for that.
I am using tig all the time, really convenient, I share sentiment of the author, command line is most convenient. I do use Vim and awesome Tim Pope Fugitive for blame and such operations. I am glad this information is publicized.
Cool. Makes life easy. Accessing all info on command line is awesome. History/Diff view is best thing about it. Thanks for sharing. I see myself using it on daily basis.
i too like the fact that the makers of sourcetree write about it.
I've been using tig since the very first version. I have tried to find something similar for mercurial without luck. it's probably one of the main reasons why i prefer git over mercurial (usability wise anyway)
Oh, I was looking for something like this today. Gitk is all well and good, but I have a whole heap of commands all tied into a custom Menu for Komodo Edit. I hope `tig' can work in it's output pane: it'll be a lifesaver if it does!
[+] [-] kylec|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] abusch|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] terhechte|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jasonlotito|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kawsper|13 years ago|reply
I will give SourceTree a try, it looks interesting.
[+] [-] brown9-2|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dbarlett|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vacri|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wiremine|13 years ago|reply
Also, here's the manual: http://jonas.nitro.dk/tig/manual.html
[+] [-] cbsmith|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ocharles|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ozataman|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] justinhj|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thurn|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] leephillips|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] homosaur|13 years ago|reply
I'd never even heard of Tig but I am already in love after about 5 minutes of usage. I'm comfortable with the Git CL and if you toss Git log enough flags, it gives you a very nice printout, but you can't actually DO anything there. This is a nice solution when you're working on a remote server but I'd also bet that if SourceTree is not open, I'm going to find myself more and more dropping into Tig rather than using SourceTree.
[+] [-] 108|13 years ago|reply
Atlassian blogged about it.
[+] [-] dinduks|13 years ago|reply
Otherwise, tig is neat. I personally won't have to do `git lga` + copy commit's SHA1 + `git show COPIED_SHA1` anymore.
The thing it lacks imo, is more VI-style shortcuts (such as "gg" and "G"), displaying the SHA1 of each commit, and a feature to copy the hash of a specific commit.
[+] [-] micampe|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] terhechte|13 years ago|reply
[1] https://github.com/tpope/vim-fugitive [2] https://github.com/gregsexton/gitv
[+] [-] npongratz|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] RBerenguel|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] josx|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] daigoba66|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] moreati|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pluies|13 years ago|reply
No fussing around with your mouse, or alt-tabbing to another window, or waiting for a JVM to start. It’s there at your fingertips whenever you need it. It literally loads the 50,000 commits of the JIRA codebase in a fraction of a second.
And:
In short, it is the mutt to your Outlook, the Vim to your Emacs, the w3m to your Firefox.
[+] [-] doki_pen|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andrewflnr|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Millennium|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tiziano88|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] etherealG|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oneandoneis2|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gpeal|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sethrin|13 years ago|reply
There are very few times that I would not prefer using a GUI, when the alternative would be typing all or part of a hash. The hash is for machine consumption, not human consumption: let the machine deal with it. To that particular end, I have found SmartGit to be excellent, and would recommend it.
Re: complaints about GUI tools: Someone is going to have to tell me why you would be using git via a remote ssh session instead of having a local copy. I am sure there is a logical scenario for that.
[+] [-] diego_moita|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] desireco42|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kleiba|13 years ago|reply
What's wrong with that?
it is the mutt to your Outlook, the Vim to your Emacs, the w3m to your Firefox.
Not sure I can follow?!
[+] [-] bstpierre|13 years ago|reply
Not speaking for the author, but Tcl/Tk apps tend to be ugly. I use gitk from time to time, but it's ugly and has some usability problems.
> Not sure I can follow?!
Mutt is a terminal-based MUA. Where Outlook is a giant monstrosity of a mail client, mutt is fast and tiny.
Vim is [can be] a terminal-based text editor. The claim here is that emacs is big, ugly, and slow and vim is smaller & faster.
w3m is a terminal-based browser. In comparison, firefox is a slow, giant, memory sucking graphical browser.
[+] [-] Newky|13 years ago|reply
I have been using it as a direct replacement for git log, and its something that gets installed on any system I work on for any length of time.
[+] [-] a3n|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] deepak-kumar|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] human_error|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stefans|13 years ago|reply
I would consider this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5667935 to be a good example of why that can be useful, no?
[+] [-] rjzzleep|13 years ago|reply
I've been using tig since the very first version. I have tried to find something similar for mercurial without luck. it's probably one of the main reasons why i prefer git over mercurial (usability wise anyway)
[+] [-] kickingvegas|13 years ago|reply
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Ver...
[+] [-] girvo|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] btucker|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pyxy|13 years ago|reply
It's just burning my eyes with blue and magenta colors :)
[+] [-] pyxy|13 years ago|reply
https://pastee.org/tyk54
[+] [-] pyxy|13 years ago|reply