"A classic but I'm not quite sure why it was posted?"
and why is it getting so many upvotes? Extending this approach, if anyone is looking for free karma, just post separate links to all the classic CS books, without any comments or added explanation (3 separate submissions for the TAOCP Knuth books ;-)). Lots of karma for the taking ;-)
now that this is on the front page, here is something interesting. There's a 1000 $ prize for designing a cover for the third edition (see top right hand corner of teh page). The cover of the first two editions are very dense with references to AI history. If I could draw worth a damn I would have taken a shot at it.
Serious tease. I expected either the text available online, lecture videos or at the very least a courseware podcast from Berkeley. I guess I'll go back to staring at it at the bookstore...
While the book is good, it lacks the statistical approach to AI and ML. Currently, most of the AI or ML is done in statistical fashion and I think this book does not do justice in introducing those topics well.
Part V Uncertain Knowledge and Reasoning
13 Uncertainty
14 Probabilistic Reasoning
15 Probabilistic Reasoning Over Time
16 Making Simple Decisions
17 Making Complex Decisions
Part VI Learning
18 Learning from Observations
19 Knowledge in Learning
20 Statistical Learning Methods (pdf)
21 Reinforcement Learning
Part VII Communicating, Perceiving, and Acting
22 Communication
23 Probabilistic Language Processing
24 Perception
25 Robotics
Part VIII Conclusions
26 Philosophical Foundations
27 AI: Present and Future
Bibliography (pdf and counts)
Index (html or pdf)
I love this book as well, and I make sure to read it over regularly to spark different ideas - but it's expensive. Buying it was a bitterweet experience, to say the least.
Owell, it's at least the best you're likely to find.
It bored me to tears. The "agent" orientation of the book does not address my needs for AI: data mining and inference. Norvig's companion Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence was a bliss however :-)
The ToC doesn't contain anything about the situated cognition, enactive cognition schools of thought, so I find applying the term AI to this book too broad. The topics covered seems to broadly fall under "automatic problem solving strategies" or something like that. Check out Rodney Brooks' robotics work for anything that feels like intelligence.
[+] [-] jlees|17 years ago|reply
Is the Google Code or design-a-cover thing the actual news here?
[+] [-] plinkplonk|17 years ago|reply
and why is it getting so many upvotes? Extending this approach, if anyone is looking for free karma, just post separate links to all the classic CS books, without any comments or added explanation (3 separate submissions for the TAOCP Knuth books ;-)). Lots of karma for the taking ;-)
now that this is on the front page, here is something interesting. There's a 1000 $ prize for designing a cover for the third edition (see top right hand corner of teh page). The cover of the first two editions are very dense with references to AI history. If I could draw worth a damn I would have taken a shot at it.
[+] [-] jjames|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ricree|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] paraschopra|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] schtog|17 years ago|reply
Part V Uncertain Knowledge and Reasoning 13 Uncertainty 14 Probabilistic Reasoning 15 Probabilistic Reasoning Over Time 16 Making Simple Decisions 17 Making Complex Decisions Part VI Learning 18 Learning from Observations 19 Knowledge in Learning 20 Statistical Learning Methods (pdf) 21 Reinforcement Learning Part VII Communicating, Perceiving, and Acting 22 Communication 23 Probabilistic Language Processing 24 Perception 25 Robotics Part VIII Conclusions 26 Philosophical Foundations 27 AI: Present and Future Bibliography (pdf and counts) Index (html or pdf)
[+] [-] vang3lis|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] benkant|17 years ago|reply
http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/esm/ecs_ai/
[+] [-] fizz|17 years ago|reply
Or maybe if we are posting up classics we could mention The Society of Mind by Marvin Minsky.
[+] [-] Eliezer|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sgrove|17 years ago|reply
Owell, it's at least the best you're likely to find.
[+] [-] vang3lis|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mahmud|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aufreak|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zandorg|17 years ago|reply