top | item 575450

AK-DL1 The most expensive ethernet cable ever...

17 points| blackmac | 17 years ago |usa.denon.com | reply

22 comments

order
[+] noonespecial|17 years ago|reply
Well, you could gold plate and tin shield every nanometer of conductor to make sure that no bit is ever lost...

OR you could, I don't know make some sort of algorithm that, I don't know calculated some sort of sum of every block of data transmitted and then, like checked the sum to see if it was right. You could retransmit the block if it wasn't since Gig-ethernet is what like 1000 times faster than cd audio?

My plastic cables available with this revolutionary data integrity algorithm on sale now for just $499.

[+] mseebach|17 years ago|reply
> Additionally, signal directional markings are provided for optimum signal transfer.

That's my favorite feature.

[+] acangiano|17 years ago|reply
Children, Christians and audiophiles say the darnest things.
[+] blackmac|17 years ago|reply
I know someone who told me not to copy mp3s more than once, because quality gets worse with every copy. Moreover if you store mp3s too long the quality also decreases. This is known as a serious problem among audiophiles, because it prevents digital files from being archived for a longer time. (he REALLY meant it)
[+] cperciva|17 years ago|reply
if you store mp3s too long the quality also decreases...

Well, depending on the underlying physical storage, there's a good chance that you'll see some data corruption on timescales ranging from a few years to a few centuries... so he's not COMPLETELY wrong. :-)

[+] Steve0|17 years ago|reply
True, amongst other things, it depends on the fragmentation of the disk, if you listen to your mp3's after a defrag the highs are more pronounced; the soundstage better defined; the bass will improve in several subtle ways.

Hmm, might be a startup in selling an mp3-defragger. Of course you need to charge at least 666$ for anyone in the niche to take you seriously.

[+] quoderat|17 years ago|reply
Some people really don't understand the concept of "digital," do they?

Someone ran a test where they used wire coathangers vs. the best audiophile cable there was. No one could tell the difference.

[+] eru|17 years ago|reply
Was the test done with digital music?
[+] trafficlight|17 years ago|reply
The comments on the Amazon page are classic.

"Due to the extreme speeds at which energy moves through the cable, it was no surprise that these effects would cause the cable housing to become quantum entangled with itself in space and time, thusly bringing the cable (interior and exterior) into its own self-generating time dilation field."

http://www.amazon.com/Denon-AKDL1-Dedicated-Link-Cable/dp/B0...

[+] fishercs|17 years ago|reply
i wonder if an 80 year old IT artisan crafted those cables by hand.
[+] jws|17 years ago|reply
I'm certain that 500 meters of 10base-5 cost several times more than this cable.

This was the "original" popular ethernet. It was a coaxial cable about as big around as a finger and had a stripe around it every 2.5 meters. Wherever you needed a connection you found the nearest stripe, drilled into the cable until you just reached the core and inserted a special vampire tap attached to a transceiver the size of a shoe which sent another finger sized cable down to your device.

[+] thalur|17 years ago|reply
And there was me thinking it would be an article about some undersea cable across the atlantic or pacific...
[+] jcromartie|17 years ago|reply
> bring out all the nuances in digital audio reproduction

Isn't this sort of advertising illegal?