I like how the free software community is very loose. Lots of jokes in the documentation. Python and Norwegian Blue parrots, for example. But naming your distro Rebecca Black Linux, might undermine credibility just a tiny bit. (But obviously you aren't hurting anyone, so: nice job on the wayland live cd!)
For a technology preview project the name is fine, albeit not googleable. I don't think that a project like this has to choose a name people can sell to the management.
From my own experience, really chose something that is googleable. It's frustrating when you never have a change to be found when people type your project's name into google because it's an artist's name or a common word. And yes, i think finding a good name for a project is hard.
It's interesting to see how Canonical's announcement of Mir seemed to spur new interest around Wayland and an acceleration of its development, generating a new wave of announcements (i.e.: Gnome deciding to go "all wayland" by 3.12, etc).
That sure seems to have been a kick in the pants. More specifically, it spurred interest in using the Android HAL in the underpinnings of a Weston compositor.
Having gotten that kick in the pants, I hope they can all just get along and resolve resource and schedule issues between two projects that look functionally identical now.
It initially sounded like a convenient way to quickly try out Wayland, but there must be a lot of unnecessary software included with it, thus making it quite inconvenient to try out.
Download with DownThemAll, it's a great Firefox download manager extension. It supports multiple pieces, multiple mirrors and resuming, taking all the trouble out of downloading big files over http.
[+] [-] AlexanderDhoore|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] claudius|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] moreentropy|13 years ago|reply
From my own experience, really chose something that is googleable. It's frustrating when you never have a change to be found when people type your project's name into google because it's an artist's name or a common word. And yes, i think finding a good name for a project is hard.
[+] [-] seanp2k2|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] anonymous|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] trust-me|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lvillani|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Zigurd|13 years ago|reply
Having gotten that kick in the pants, I hope they can all just get along and resolve resource and schedule issues between two projects that look functionally identical now.
[+] [-] rplacd|13 years ago|reply
(!)
[+] [-] yeasayer|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] PommeDeTerre|13 years ago|reply
It initially sounded like a convenient way to quickly try out Wayland, but there must be a lot of unnecessary software included with it, thus making it quite inconvenient to try out.
[+] [-] pronoiac|13 years ago|reply
I'm stopping and editing out my own torrent because this one's already up and running.
[+] [-] kristofferR|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pepijndevos|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tmzt|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Someone|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] keithpeter|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kierank|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lifeisstillgood|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] phoboslab|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] asperous|13 years ago|reply
Currently it's
Display <- Compositor <- X11 Client <- X11 Server <- App
Wayland:
Display <- Compositor (Wayland) <- App
[+] [-] simula67|13 years ago|reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIctzAQOe44
[+] [-] HNLogInShit|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] mahrain|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] HNLogInShit|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]