After taking a look I want to ask about a few features I would expect to say goodbye to my "old" editor (I actually just migrated from VIM to Emacs). Are they there, or are they going to be included?
- auto completion, file names, var names, classes and functions, words in general etc. (like in: vim - omnicomplete, emacs: auto-complete)
- fill column marker (v: colorcolumn, e: many, fill-column-indicator)
- code outline (v: TagBar, e: Speedbar)
- refactoring support, rename var/fun/class (many options)
- go to definition (for Python v: python-mode, e: elpy; or generically with ctags, etags)
- comment region (v: NERDCommenter, e: comment-region)
- declare and insert snippets (v: vim-snipmate, e: yasnippet and others)
- rectangular selection and operations (v: Ctrl-v, e: C-x r ... or rect-mark)
- find file in project (fuzzy matching optional) (v: Command-T, e: find-file-in-project, ifind, others)
- find in files (v: :(vim)grep or other, e: lgrep or multiple others)
- change/set surrounding "'([{ chars (v: surround, e: wrap-region or (somewhat) paredit)
And probably many others I don't remember now.
I don't want to sound like I'm saying the product is a bad idea or that what we have now is sufficient and we don't need new things. I'm honestly very used to these features and they make me more productive; if I was a hobbyist, I could switch to less featureful editor right now, but for a professional your productivity determines your income for the large part. So, while I like the idea of in-browser editors, I cannot use them unless they have the features I need. If they are in different places then ok, but not if they are lacking.
Are you sure that you like the idea of in-browser editors? The only feature that I see as useful is the "zero deployment/any device" and I can't imagine that feature coming in handy very often.
What else do you like about them?
If you like vim or emacs - the Cons seem to far outweigh the one Pro that I can see for these types of editors:
- Online only.
- Client and service back-end usually not open source.
- Far less robust, feature-wise.
- Limited to using these for languages that their back-end supports.
- Limited by browser technology. For instance:
Can I break those tabs out to a new window?
How well does that perform?
Can I middle-click a document-tab to close it?
Does it integrate well with the rest of the
programs running on my operating system?
To the folks at friendco.de: Sorry for being negative. It's nothing personal - I just prefer native over web for my applications and I'm curious as to what people find to be good about web apps besides the one Pro that I mentioned.
This looks pretty cool and I'm going to check it out, but I'm not signing up with GitHub since you ask for access to my private repos by default. Given that I use GitHub for my day job, I'm not really comfortable giving a service I've never heard of access to our code base. It would be great if this was opt-in. (e.g. ask for my public repos now and then ask me later about private ones)
Nice work! Have you played with Koding.com at all? This is very similar and seems to be a space that is heating up. I will definitely give this a shot.
One quick piece of feedback: some of the grammar felt strange. I'm assuming you aren't native english speakers? No problem, I'm sure someone can help you polish that later.
Thanks. We know of Koding, we haven't spoke with their team though.
It seems like coding is really focusing on it's social features and wants to become the "facebook for developers".
I can't condemn that, but I think there is more value to be built, by focussing on improving the coding experience and it's simplicity.
We're a two man team, I'm a native english speaker, but taking care of the backend side of things I don't always have the time to perfect the grammar mistakes my co-founder makes.
He's french by the way, and I think he still does a pretty good job :)
Thanks for pointing that out, we'll definitely improve that when things calm down a bit
It would be nice if I didn't have to set up _another_ repo. Integrating with GitHub or BitBucket would be preferred (be backed by, not just import). That said, I wouldn't actually use it since GitHub lets you edit individual files through the UI. Just an observation. The rest looks nice though.
Right now, we integrate both with GitHub as a "Repository provider" and Heroku as a PaaS.
If you connect your Github account we'll import your GitHub repositories.
And we do have a primitive and slightly awkward way of pushing back to your github repository. That will be improved in the coming days. To make it more obvious and easier.
Thanks for pointing that out. We want to integrate as well as possible with current existing services.
There is no need to reinvent the wheel regarding code hosting and we want to focus on what makes us different.
While running the sample nodejs code, it opened a virtual terminal with the message "Building application in a new virtual machine" - Are you actually creating a new virtual machine for every app that is run? Isn't that resource-consuming?
This looks great. When will you shut up and start taking my money? I'm worried of getting too attached, that this beautiful piece of work looks like it has no business model.
Thanks, happy to hear that you like it. We do have a business model and multiple possible revenue streams. The most obvious one being freemium. We're in beta right now, so it made sense for us to keep it free during beta. We will be rolling out pricing as soon as we leave beta.
It'll always be free for individuals, but we'll have paid versions for larger teams and companies.
First of all Cloud9 is a very good solution, they are the initial pioneers in cloud coding, and they built some good technology that we contribute to (and use small parts of).
We really try to focus on simplicity and extensibility.
We're trying a few different approaches, one of them being providing a whole network besides the code editor itself, so people can share plugins, build teams, find freelancers (that kind of stuff).
Cloud9 is very good, we're just about 6 months old and a two man team, so we're exploring things and trying to innovate.
[+] [-] klibertp|12 years ago|reply
I don't want to sound like I'm saying the product is a bad idea or that what we have now is sufficient and we don't need new things. I'm honestly very used to these features and they make me more productive; if I was a hobbyist, I could switch to less featureful editor right now, but for a professional your productivity determines your income for the large part. So, while I like the idea of in-browser editors, I cannot use them unless they have the features I need. If they are in different places then ok, but not if they are lacking.
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] WayneDB|12 years ago|reply
What else do you like about them?
If you like vim or emacs - the Cons seem to far outweigh the one Pro that I can see for these types of editors:
To the folks at friendco.de: Sorry for being negative. It's nothing personal - I just prefer native over web for my applications and I'm curious as to what people find to be good about web apps besides the one Pro that I mentioned.[+] [-] michaelmior|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
We don't import your private repositories as of now, only your public ones.
I think you did good to point this out, we'll make it more clear and visible in the future.
We're only six months into our adventure so far and we're in beta, but we're definitely improving.
And your feedback is very helpful. Thanks for that
[+] [-] davidandgoliath|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lucio|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] martin-adams|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yesimahuman|12 years ago|reply
One quick piece of feedback: some of the grammar felt strange. I'm assuming you aren't native english speakers? No problem, I'm sure someone can help you polish that later.
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
It seems like coding is really focusing on it's social features and wants to become the "facebook for developers".
I can't condemn that, but I think there is more value to be built, by focussing on improving the coding experience and it's simplicity.
We're a two man team, I'm a native english speaker, but taking care of the backend side of things I don't always have the time to perfect the grammar mistakes my co-founder makes.
He's french by the way, and I think he still does a pretty good job :)
Thanks for pointing that out, we'll definitely improve that when things calm down a bit
[+] [-] __xtrimsky|12 years ago|reply
PS: I am a PHP developer using Netbeans
- Autocomplete (for function names, vars and methods)
- Control + Click on a var/function/method opens the file where that is located and bring you there
- Also would be easier if it had Dropbox/Google Drive support, I am cheap so I don't pay github, I find it too expensive.
[+] [-] hallowtech|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
If you connect your Github account we'll import your GitHub repositories.
And we do have a primitive and slightly awkward way of pushing back to your github repository. That will be improved in the coming days. To make it more obvious and easier.
Thanks for pointing that out. We want to integrate as well as possible with current existing services.
There is no need to reinvent the wheel regarding code hosting and we want to focus on what makes us different.
Hope that answers your question.
[+] [-] shrikrishna|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] codereflection|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dreyfiz|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
It'll always be free for individuals, but we'll have paid versions for larger teams and companies.
[+] [-] mcintyre1994|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
We're on it right now.
[+] [-] codereflection|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jackmaney|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
We do integrate with Github and Heroku as of now.
Expect this integration to involve over time and we'll also integrate with other services (Amazon AWS, DotCloud ...)
[+] [-] bsimpson|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] alpb|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] abhinai|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] james33|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
We really try to focus on simplicity and extensibility.
We're trying a few different approaches, one of them being providing a whole network besides the code editor itself, so people can share plugins, build teams, find freelancers (that kind of stuff).
Cloud9 is very good, we're just about 6 months old and a two man team, so we're exploring things and trying to innovate.
Hope that answers your question.
[+] [-] g3rald|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] friendcode|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yfaber|12 years ago|reply