Who cares? By the time this item gets upvotes the sites are almost always fixed. Is this hacker news worthy? I suggest we ban these submissions. This is the second, X is down notice today, Github [1] and Dropbox [2]. Personally, I'd much prefer a submission to https://status.github.com/ with a comment about the Major service outage. Posting the Github.com link is next to useless.
I think it's fine to post about outages - that's relevant news, and even if site is back up, always results in relevant and theoretically good discussion.
I do agree that linking to the URL that's down is a special kind of stupid. At that point, it's a non-link, and there's little value in watching my browser spin.
100% FullAck : Who cares! Git is a DISTRIBUTED VCS exactly for this reason, so there is absolutely _no point at all_ to bother HN unless its a full outage lasting longer than 1 day.
For those who use Github as their primary origin server AND perform deploys via git, do you have redundancy measures in place to enable you to keep pushing code even during these outages?
It seems that page must be manually updated or very slow to update. I noticed gists weren't working for what seemed like 15 minutes or more before it acknowledged there was an issue.
Even now it lists all services as available even though the top message indicates a major disruption.
[+] [-] WestCoastJustin|13 years ago|reply
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5793948
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5792510
[+] [-] bdcravens|13 years ago|reply
I do agree that linking to the URL that's down is a special kind of stupid. At that point, it's a non-link, and there's little value in watching my browser spin.
[+] [-] jt2190|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] naranja|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cybernoodles|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dreen|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] callmevlad|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pbiggar|13 years ago|reply
If you use a hosted Continuous Delivery system like https://circleci.com (which is my company), it's really easy to do.
[+] [-] trebor|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] issaria|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dpcx|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikeevans|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] jkubicek|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] leetrout|13 years ago|reply
Even now it lists all services as available even though the top message indicates a major disruption.
[+] [-] cullenmacdonald|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dpedu|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gabipurcaru|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] garand|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kevinastone|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kine|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dedene|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tlongren|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] iffyuva|13 years ago|reply