top | item 5855833 (no title) tkahn6 | 12 years ago I think your fictional example perfectly captures how flawed your argument is. discuss order hn newest xtrumanx|12 years ago Do you mind expanding on your comment? I don't see the flaw in gohrt's argument.To avoid getting into a debate about smoke detectors and fire departments, can you clarify the flaw in the actual argument he raised:> If we already have enough data to predict criminal acts, and we are still failing, how is collecting more data the solution? mpyne|12 years ago Imagine a smoke detector that could note the presence of conditions known to lead the fire and pre-alert the fire department to be ready to respond quickly... load replies (1)
xtrumanx|12 years ago Do you mind expanding on your comment? I don't see the flaw in gohrt's argument.To avoid getting into a debate about smoke detectors and fire departments, can you clarify the flaw in the actual argument he raised:> If we already have enough data to predict criminal acts, and we are still failing, how is collecting more data the solution? mpyne|12 years ago Imagine a smoke detector that could note the presence of conditions known to lead the fire and pre-alert the fire department to be ready to respond quickly... load replies (1)
mpyne|12 years ago Imagine a smoke detector that could note the presence of conditions known to lead the fire and pre-alert the fire department to be ready to respond quickly... load replies (1)
xtrumanx|12 years ago
To avoid getting into a debate about smoke detectors and fire departments, can you clarify the flaw in the actual argument he raised:
> If we already have enough data to predict criminal acts, and we are still failing, how is collecting more data the solution?
mpyne|12 years ago