Snowden's choice of helper countries is a national security risk to the United States. Here you have someone in possession of (still undisclosed) state secrets from his work at the NSA, and who needs help from a foreign government. That's the very definition of compromised. What is he going to trade for protection? More classified information, of course--possibly much more sensitive information than the existence of programs like PRISM, which foreign spy agencies have likely known about for years. He has national security information, foreign governments want it, and they eventually will get it. This intel will eventually flow to China and/or Russia, where it will remain secret and used against the United States.
As others have said, the US placed him in that position themselves. Why should he owe any loyalty to a country and a government that wants to detain and perhaps torture or even execute him?
Loyalty to humanity as a whole should (and seemingly has, in his case) override more parochial considerations. The "national security" of the US nation is far less important than the individual humans who live in it, and Snowden has done the latter a great service.
The key difference in this case is that the information is flowing not directly to the foreign governments themselves, as in past cases, but rather to independent journalist organizations, so that the information can be known to everyone, both world governments and their citizens, equally.
Snowden has awakened the whole world to the surveillance leviathan that is the US. The US have been the one world government for awhile now, it's just that most people (and countries) refused to see it until now.
The C&D to the Bitcoins Foundation is no surprise either. It's in the cross hairs of the US government and it can't be allowed to exist. Read the book Cypherpunks and you'll find out why. I'm sure those in power know the book well.
Bad idea. I personally know a guy who was illegally kidnapped by the US government from Ecuador with the assistance of local police. Snowden will regret this decision.
I'm not trusting any "sources" that claim to know his final destination, as various ones have claimed Venezuela, Norway, and now Ecuador. I guess we'll have to wait a couple days to know what'll really happen.
Just wondering: What would be the appeals process if he were actually kidnapped by the US government in a foreign country. Is there some court by the United Nations that is mediating such cases even if there is an extreme power imbalance between both nations?
It doesn't necessarily mean that he has to go to Ecuador, he can stay in the Ecuadorian Embassy in Moscow (if there is one). But, can he? He doesn't have a visa to exit the airport.
News you can trust, with desk reporter Julian Assange, field reporter Edward Snowden. Today we give an update on John McCain's trip to Syria, with video of McCain's night feeding on human organs with his best buddy, opposition leader Khalid Al-Hamad.
I hope he has plan B, or starts planning it. Ecuador is a tiny country and can easily be influenced by USA once this government falls. In smaller countries when USA needs a favor, it "forgets" a few things their leader does when it comes to human rights, elections and so on.
[+] [-] codex|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lmm|12 years ago|reply
Loyalty to humanity as a whole should (and seemingly has, in his case) override more parochial considerations. The "national security" of the US nation is far less important than the individual humans who live in it, and Snowden has done the latter a great service.
[+] [-] blhack|12 years ago|reply
Perhaps Ecuador cares about human rights?
[+] [-] kinghajj|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Ultron|12 years ago|reply
The C&D to the Bitcoins Foundation is no surprise either. It's in the cross hairs of the US government and it can't be allowed to exist. Read the book Cypherpunks and you'll find out why. I'm sure those in power know the book well.
[+] [-] throwawayyyz|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] werid|12 years ago|reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordechai_Vanunu
[+] [-] kinghajj|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lhnz|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pvnick|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 1337biz|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lawnchair_larry|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ngoel36|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] sudhirj|12 years ago|reply
The Wikileaks statement has been updated to confirm this.
[+] [-] nodata|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jakejake|12 years ago|reply
It's also a great time for lawmakers to pass unrelated, controversial legislation while everyone's attention is elsewhere.
[+] [-] sho_hn|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cdash|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] return0|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sold|12 years ago|reply
[1] https://twitter.com/NewsBreaker/status/348800297700835328
[+] [-] dubfan|12 years ago|reply
http://embajada-ecuador.ru/ecuador/
[+] [-] Havoc|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ChuckMcM|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eli|12 years ago|reply
It is politically beneficial for him to embarrass the US government and make them appear weak.
[+] [-] moo|12 years ago|reply
Yeah, I'm liking the new media.
[+] [-] jlgreco|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] namank|12 years ago|reply
But it's important to post for it to serve the purpose.
[+] [-] throwaway10001|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] blasphemy|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]