If you are an economist (a field is already more an ideology / spin machine than science -- the science part in it is basically math), and you are more into entertainment (e.g making the NYT best selling list of shallow books) than science, then you can "prove" a lot of things, without actually proving anything.
Start with a few unexamined wrong assumptions, select the data that fit your conclusion, dress them up with anecdotes and prose, and there you go!
kansface|12 years ago
runawaybottle|12 years ago
bmmayer1|12 years ago
npc|12 years ago
http://www.princeton.edu/~pager/race_at_work.pdf
http://www.eeo1.com/1999_NR/Title.pdf
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/us/01race.html?_r=2
coldtea|12 years ago
Start with a few unexamined wrong assumptions, select the data that fit your conclusion, dress them up with anecdotes and prose, and there you go!