(no title)
dram | 12 years ago
It's remarkable that this interview with Richard Clarke only has 53,000 hits- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl6w1YaZdf8
It's sad that people just ignored the chief of counter terrorism on 9/11 stating that CIA knew terrorists were in the US planning an attack and purposely withheld it from the White House in an effort to develop sources. Not to mention ignoring the involvement of Saudi Arabia.
Alex3917|12 years ago
- Lots of CIA agents who have testified that they knew about the hijackers but were prevented from stopping them, e.g.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/13/1016585/-Frontline-...
- High level FBI agents who have testified they would have stopped the attacks, but were purposely kept in the dark.
- The fact that on the morning of 9/11 the guy who wired 100k to Muhammed Atta to pay for the hijackings was having breakfast with the two guys who ran the official investigation into the attacks.
All this stuff about whether it was or wasn't a controlled demolition is just a red herring.
DuskStar|12 years ago
sneak|12 years ago
Then why wasn't he placed on trial for this crime?
He's still sitting in Guantánamo, supposedly "awaiting trial".