So... this doesn't really seem to add anything. They admit to having a Adult flag which removes the blog from all site listings and from google searches. This effectively kills the blog. What they don't deny is recently and massively increasing the scope of the flagging. This is what people are worried about. People are claiming non-spam nsfw blogs are being flagged. Blogs that wouldn't have been banned before.
Blocking tags on the mobile app is a separate issue, they don't really have a choice here. Apple will pull their app if they don't.
The article says that being blocked from searches and search engines was a bug:
> As some of you have pointed out, disabling Safe Mode still wasn’t allowing search results from all blogs to appear. This has been fixed.
> If your blog contains anything too sexy for the average workplace, simply check "Flag this blog as NSFW" so people in Safe Mode can avoid it. Your blog will still be promoted in third-party search engines.
Unless I misunderstood, the article other I read said there was no way to search for the NSFW tumblrs (or however you'd say it) _within_ tumblr. That would be a much bigger deal than not being able to find it from google. If you can't find it within, that means it's nearly impossible to find it in the future.
Do we know that a significant number of non-spam NSFW blogs were being flagged as "Adult" by Tumblr, or is it possible that people were enabling this flag themselves without realizing its implications?
These blogs are mostly posting pics from porn sites and slapping ads on them. Search is irrelevant. There isn't really any context.
So this doesn't kill the blog as long as people spam links to the site on Reddit. They were never going to be found by (or linked to) google in the first place.
I'm still waiting for a real porn filter for my tumblr. These changes screw authors over without letting me actually have the browsing experience I want.
I follow a bunch of blogs which, very occasionally, post something NSFW, which they tag #NSFW. I want to see most of their posts, but filter out those tagged ones from my dashboard, whether I view it from my PC or phone. (in a web browser, it's possible to do this with an unofficial extension, which tumblr breaks every couple of weeks and then has to be patched. on your phone, you're stuck seeing the porn on the subway, with people looking over your shoulder.)
this is simple; a text field of blocked tags for each user, and then filter the input to their dashboard table (or whatever). There is no way to do this at present. (I've just checked my settings page, and still not there.)
(this doesn't just work for porn; it also lets people filter out stuff on a topic that they aren't interested in, but see the other stuff from those users. Twitter also lacks this feature, although many twitter clients do implement a "tag mute" setting.)
The reason you see innocent tags like #gay being blocked on certain platforms is that they are still frequently returning adult content which our entire app was close to being banned for.
I guess it's about Apple's no porn policy, but I thought results returned by search were OK with a 17+ years warning. Or is it for pure browsing clients only, and platform owners' official app don't get the same privilege ? Am I missing something ? (not that Apple's policies are consistent or evenly applied, but still...)
Apple review policies and reviewers are really inconsistent. Their process isn't transparent in any way and who reviews your app has a lot of leeway for rejecting your submission, even if its the reviewers mistake.
Apple's policy is completely consistent here. If you are a browser then you don't control the data that the user is accessing. But with all other apps especially Tumblr you do control the data.
While I think its really cool from a programming perspective, from a web design perspective, that logo was annoying the shit out of me.
If you want me to read your blog, let me read it and stop distracting me.
Well, it seems it was a glitch + some misinformation (not helped by the said glitch), but I already see two problems with that :
1) As with Facebook, people who will hate it will still hang on because a lot of existing content they've subscribed/favorited/bookmarked etc...
2) Getting the Tumblr userbase to do anything other than whine is like herding cats into dancing Gangnam Style (I mean real cats, not Psy with superimposed kitty faces).
If you're unhappy with whatever they're doing, a better option (IMO)would be to complain even louder until Tumbler actually changes things. Unlike FB, which is pretty deaf to complaints to begin with and is run by Satan-lite (Zuckerberg), Tumblr was only recently acquired and Yahoo investors don't want to sink the boat.
The complaints are not about censorship, they are about being de-indexed. "Adult" blogs are a separate category of NSFW, so this response doesn't address the issue - which is specifically regarding "adult" blogs.
In addition to disabling search for adult blogs, Tumblr has enabled robots.txt (Disallow: /) for all "adult" blogs so they're not findable from the outside any more either. On top of all this, Tumblr removed its Erotica category, which was formerly released in January 2010 with much pride on their part.
This all changed sometime early this year, and began to be noticed by sex bloggers both on and off of Tumblr in mid-May.
I didn't even realize that Tumblr had community editors that curated their hash tags, is there some place with more information on this, besides this page? http://www.tumblr.com/docs/en/editor_guidelines
From a friend: "They seem to have rescinded a lot of it, albeit with a shitty nonapology blaming users: <link to this post>. Some of the tags in question could never [have] brought up porn, like 'depression'. I call at least partial bullshit."
Not sure what the 'depression' tag has to do with any of this - it is not filtered, it returns results, and it has a PSA at the top of the page as with other specific keywords due to the nature of the search query.
[+] [-] epochwolf|12 years ago|reply
Blocking tags on the mobile app is a separate issue, they don't really have a choice here. Apple will pull their app if they don't.
[+] [-] rpicard|12 years ago|reply
> As some of you have pointed out, disabling Safe Mode still wasn’t allowing search results from all blogs to appear. This has been fixed.
> If your blog contains anything too sexy for the average workplace, simply check "Flag this blog as NSFW" so people in Safe Mode can avoid it. Your blog will still be promoted in third-party search engines.
[+] [-] davidu|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tieTYT|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] duskwuff|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anigbrowl|12 years ago|reply
So what? nobody owes you a free search engine listing.
[+] [-] johnpowell|12 years ago|reply
So this doesn't kill the blog as long as people spam links to the site on Reddit. They were never going to be found by (or linked to) google in the first place.
[+] [-] ionwake|12 years ago|reply
"Flag this blog as NSFW" so people in Safe Mode can avoid it. Your blog will still be promoted in third-party search engines."
...which implies you CAN search for NSFW tumblr blogs, with google?
Or am I wrong/confused?
[+] [-] werid|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tehwalrus|12 years ago|reply
I follow a bunch of blogs which, very occasionally, post something NSFW, which they tag #NSFW. I want to see most of their posts, but filter out those tagged ones from my dashboard, whether I view it from my PC or phone. (in a web browser, it's possible to do this with an unofficial extension, which tumblr breaks every couple of weeks and then has to be patched. on your phone, you're stuck seeing the porn on the subway, with people looking over your shoulder.)
this is simple; a text field of blocked tags for each user, and then filter the input to their dashboard table (or whatever). There is no way to do this at present. (I've just checked my settings page, and still not there.)
(this doesn't just work for porn; it also lets people filter out stuff on a topic that they aren't interested in, but see the other stuff from those users. Twitter also lacks this feature, although many twitter clients do implement a "tag mute" setting.)
[+] [-] hrktb|12 years ago|reply
I guess it's about Apple's no porn policy, but I thought results returned by search were OK with a 17+ years warning. Or is it for pure browsing clients only, and platform owners' official app don't get the same privilege ? Am I missing something ? (not that Apple's policies are consistent or evenly applied, but still...)
[+] [-] king_jester|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] threeseed|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] werid|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] scott_o|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] olog-hai|12 years ago|reply
Evernote Clearly
Readability's Read Now feature
InstaRead
viewtext.org (always extremely slow for me)
[+] [-] wavesounds|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mullingitover|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eksith|12 years ago|reply
1) As with Facebook, people who will hate it will still hang on because a lot of existing content they've subscribed/favorited/bookmarked etc...
2) Getting the Tumblr userbase to do anything other than whine is like herding cats into dancing Gangnam Style (I mean real cats, not Psy with superimposed kitty faces).
If you're unhappy with whatever they're doing, a better option (IMO)would be to complain even louder until Tumbler actually changes things. Unlike FB, which is pretty deaf to complaints to begin with and is run by Satan-lite (Zuckerberg), Tumblr was only recently acquired and Yahoo investors don't want to sink the boat.
[+] [-] norswap|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] littletables|12 years ago|reply
In addition to disabling search for adult blogs, Tumblr has enabled robots.txt (Disallow: /) for all "adult" blogs so they're not findable from the outside any more either. On top of all this, Tumblr removed its Erotica category, which was formerly released in January 2010 with much pride on their part.
This all changed sometime early this year, and began to be noticed by sex bloggers both on and off of Tumblr in mid-May.
[+] [-] MrFoof|12 years ago|reply
This is like buying Starbucks and then getting the "brilliant idea" to stop selling coffee and to instead focus on selling coffee cakes.
[+] [-] codezero|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gmu3|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dmoney|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] elliottcarlson|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TazeTSchnitzel|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cientifico|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] drivebyacct2|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]