Err, why? It's fairly easy, and you get so much for free: portability, compiler optimizations, easy use of C libraries, easy interfacing with other languages...
One good argument I can think of would be compile time. C compiles slowly compared to almost every other language not C++. And of course you get the C compile time on top of the compile to C time, so I expect the Nimrod compile chain to be quite slow.
Doesn't mean that I am generally opposed to compiling to C, it's often a good trade-off.
yoklov|12 years ago
codygman|12 years ago
copx|12 years ago
Doesn't mean that I am generally opposed to compiling to C, it's often a good trade-off.