top | item 6299884

115, the Newest Element on the Periodic Table

75 points| tokenadult | 12 years ago |news.nationalgeographic.com | reply

29 comments

order
[+] 5555624|12 years ago|reply
The accompanying graphic of the Periodic Table has several errors: Lithium (Li) has an atomic number of 3, Protactinium (Pa) has an atomic number of 91, Lawrencium (at least they have Lr and not Lw) has an atomic number 103.
[+] eksith|12 years ago|reply
I thought I didn't have enough coffee! I had a double take at that too: H(1), He(2), Li(2), Be(4). Didn't even notice the other errors until you pointed them out.
[+] stinos|12 years ago|reply
I wish more articles were written like this: start reading, ask yourself x questions, only to see them answered while you keep reading, in a nice concise way, no more no less.
[+] yeukhon|12 years ago|reply
Any benefit for expanding the periodic table given these are "man-made" (which I believe could exist elsewhere in the universe...)?
[+] mistercow|12 years ago|reply
Well there are several reasons, but this is the coolest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability

Basically, current theory suggests that once they get to 120 protons or so, they'll start finding stable isotopes again (ones that don't decay for minutes or more). A handle on a door affords pulling, and a hypothesis affords testing, and all that.

Edit: I should add that 115 might actually be within the island, but you'd need far more neutrons, which is currently not feasible.

[+] glurgh|12 years ago|reply
That's the entire point of the periodic table - what makes it a 'periodic table' rather than 'a list of all the known (or 'found in nature') elements'. When originally conceived it included blank spots for yet un-isolated elements and some predictions about their properties could be made.

You find an element, it goes into the periodic table. Of elements.

[+] ars|12 years ago|reply
> (which I believe could exist elsewhere in the universe...)

They are unlikely to exist elsewhere except for a few moments (not even a second) after a supernova. A regular star will not make them, and they decay extremely fast.

[+] alokm|12 years ago|reply
Man-Made or not, At least they have existed. That should be enough to add it to periodic table. There is always a non zero probability that they might exist somewhere else in the universe.
[+] elyase|12 years ago|reply
Three reasons:

1- Scientific: Study of superheavy elements is related to the formation of elements in stars and ultimately to the origin of life.

2-Practical: Americium is a man made element which is used in smoke detectors.

3-Nuclear energy: In theory once the island of stability is reached it should be possible to have smaller and more powerful mini nuclear-plants which could fit into a watch.

[+] dnautics|12 years ago|reply
possible benefits as an energy storage medium once you get to the island of stability.
[+] lhl|12 years ago|reply
Wished the Swedish scientists played more video games. Elerium is a way cooler name than Ununpentium.
[+] frobozz|12 years ago|reply
All of the elements >=104 started off with a similar temporary systematic name until a final name was chosen. It may well end up being called Elerium.
[+] coldcode|12 years ago|reply
It needs a nice name. Hacknium.
[+] aegiso|12 years ago|reply
Sadly, to the general public, hacknium sounds a lot like rapeium.