top | item 6438044 (no title) EliAndrewC | 12 years ago Not so, because as others in this thread have stated, the key is intent. discuss order hn newest nitrogen|12 years ago Judging intent doesn't really work at scale. That's why we invented access controls. res0nat0r|12 years ago Access controls are in place, but they aren't absolute. Hence why intent is key in this case, and why he was found guilty. load replies (2) tankenmate|12 years ago And we peer into the mind of a third party how? BryantD|12 years ago There's a fairly large body of law that hinges on the intent of the individual.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_(criminal_law)
nitrogen|12 years ago Judging intent doesn't really work at scale. That's why we invented access controls. res0nat0r|12 years ago Access controls are in place, but they aren't absolute. Hence why intent is key in this case, and why he was found guilty. load replies (2)
res0nat0r|12 years ago Access controls are in place, but they aren't absolute. Hence why intent is key in this case, and why he was found guilty. load replies (2)
tankenmate|12 years ago And we peer into the mind of a third party how? BryantD|12 years ago There's a fairly large body of law that hinges on the intent of the individual.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_(criminal_law)
BryantD|12 years ago There's a fairly large body of law that hinges on the intent of the individual.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_(criminal_law)
nitrogen|12 years ago
res0nat0r|12 years ago
tankenmate|12 years ago
BryantD|12 years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_(criminal_law)