This method results in much shorter numerators and denominators than the list of primes it generates. Simplifying this fraction only chops off 2 or so digits on average.
so, you could even skip the math and just append the string representations of the primes.
It seems the really difficult part is finding a good simple fraction to express the string. Perhaps that's the key here. maybe the primes summed in the sequences are a subset that produces a relatively simple fractional representation.
Okay. Very interesting. For those who don't understand like me, what is the technical use of this? Where will this be used? Are we somehow going to use this in cryptography?
I don't think it does have a technical use. You certainly couldn't use this technique to generate new primes, since the fractions have been deliberately chosen based on the primes they will generate.
As it stands, it's just a fun mathematical curiosity.
[+] [-] pontifier|12 years ago|reply
D=0
SUM=0
for n:
[+] [-] svnfv|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pontifier|12 years ago|reply
It seems the really difficult part is finding a good simple fraction to express the string. Perhaps that's the key here. maybe the primes summed in the sequences are a subset that produces a relatively simple fractional representation.
[+] [-] abecedarius|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mathattack|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yeukhon|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] inglesp|12 years ago|reply
As it stands, it's just a fun mathematical curiosity.
[+] [-] KatherineJMoses|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]