The Writings of Leslie Lamport

[jdf]

Lamport's description of his failures in introducing the Paxos algorithm is a highly amusing story:

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/lamport/pubs/p...

For those that don't know, Paxos is one of the most important algorithms in distributed systems, so it's amazing to see that it wasn't even published for 8 years due to the author's ... odd structuring of the problem.

[chubot]

Whenever you have a good idea, you have to bash people over the head with it. I guess he tried that with the Indiana Jones thing and it failed. He says Butler Lampson was one of the few people who noticed its significance.

But the problem is that when you have a BAD idea you also may find yourself bashing people over the head with it :)

I wonder if he will win the Turing Award for Paxos. Awhile ago I thought it would be deserved, but I also feel like the full state machine is a bit awkward and heavy-handed for a lot of distributed systems problems (especially distributed systems over WAN, which I think is more interesting these days). I like the Bloom/CRDT work. And Raft is a simpler algorithm when you need strong consensus.

[chrismonsanto]

Yeah, it's an interesting story. My take on it: everyone in academia has their own pet problem. I think a lot of people read papers in their fields with an eye to how the paper will help them achieve their own goals. When the problem is so abstracted from what you care about, it's difficult to stay motivated & absorb the material. I imagine a lot of people put up with that paper solely because of the reputation of the author.

I also think Lamport overstates his success with formulating the Byzantine generals problem in terms of Byzantine generals. I know the problem as the Byzantine generals problem, but think of it in terms of computers, not generals. It's just easier to understand the problem that way, the generals stuff just gets in the way. iirc my distributed systems textbook (Lynch) did not actually formulate the problem in terms of generals, but I could be misremembering.

[cia_plant]

"Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System" is among the best papers I've ever read, many other great pieces here as well.

[zzzcpan]

Yeah, it's kind of one of the first things to read on distributed systems too.

[wglb]

Neat interview question.

[keithpeter]

"I was a TeX user, so I would need a set of macros. I thought that, with a little extra effort, I could make my macros usable by others.[..]"

Read the summary for paper number 69. Many here may recognise the syndrome, the punchline being the last sentence. As I use LaTeX a little, I'm grateful.

[nullc]

All of my best ideas, Lamport invented them first.

Lots of great and important ideas and the lucid writing required to convey them to others.

[discreteevent]

"Computer scientists collectively suffer from what I call the Whorfian syndrome the confusion of language with reality. Since these devices are described in different languages, they must all be different. In fact, they (..all computation basically..)are all naturally described as state machines."

[t1m]

I think it's a crime the editors failed to recognize the fundamental importance of Lamort's ground breaking paper "On Hair Color in France".

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/lamport/pubs/h...

[f137]

A seminal study. It's a pity they did not publish a follow-up on the selection criteria (or did they?)

[ecesena]

This should be made as a service

[luckydude]

I'm surprised at how little traction this gotten here.

You all like to think that you have it covered. This guy did a lot of the work that is the basis for what you do.

Go read it. If you don't understand how to do time in a distributed system you suck. He figured it out before you were born.

Edit: sorry, should have read the comments first.