The subject matter is interesting, but what I find most interesting is a blog performing real, 'hard-hitting' local journalism, of genuine interest to a very specific social subgroup.
The mainstream media had this idea first, they picked up the story of the New York highschool student who tested Red Snapper in various sushi restaurants and found that it was often Talapia.
That story got repeated in some jurisdictions, now a year or so later someone gets around to doing it with vegan food.
If you really want a "what food is advertised as isn't what it really is" story search youtube for Vegan Marshmallows. (short: some guy was supplying a 'vegan' gelatin substitute to several groups (not just vegans) and when it was tested it had animal products in it and the guy 'disappeared').
Revealing that some companies/restaurants aren't always truthful isn't a new thing. Certainly not only a year old. It's really as old as investigative journalism in general. Dating all the way back to "The Jungle".
Edit: and what you're really saying is that 'mainstream media' just copied the idea too. And from a grassroots-level at that.
dag|16 years ago
That story got repeated in some jurisdictions, now a year or so later someone gets around to doing it with vegan food.
-----
EDIT:
Sushi from New York: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/22/science/22fish.html?scp=3&...
Sushi from Toronto (reported in Vancouver): http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=4381b...
pyre|16 years ago
Revealing that some companies/restaurants aren't always truthful isn't a new thing. Certainly not only a year old. It's really as old as investigative journalism in general. Dating all the way back to "The Jungle".
Edit: and what you're really saying is that 'mainstream media' just copied the idea too. And from a grassroots-level at that.