A non-binding online poll to help pick who will be on the cover of a dying news magazine. Notable recent winners include Vladimir Putin and, uh, "you" as well as "A Protestor".
Don't forget, Awesome Award based on internet votes will be spammed all over Wikipedia, providing free advertising that points to Time Magazine, and wikipedia editors believe any award is some authoritative measure of success.
In a way, hacker news could make up an award based on internet votes and vote Miley Cyrus as the Greatest Creative Mind of the last 100 years. Wikipedia editors will be all over that.
This is the dumbest way to present a poll I have ever seen! There are 44 choices but you can either vote for "Miley Cyrus vs Jimmy Fallon" or click next 34 times and vote for Edward Snowden.
I'll give you a hint since the servers seem to be overloaded and right now I can't even vote for Snowden:
where persons-name is the name of the person you wanted to vote for. You need to prove your identity with Twitter or Facebook. I have no idea if this is new or if it's how the poll has always been run, but the voting is open 'til Dec 4.
I'm afraid if I direct link, they're just going to see it as a voting ring and disqualify all of your votes. If you can even get the page to load. I am currently still waiting.
PSA everyone: TIME Magazine's POY online technology has always been a POS, and TIME Magazine, not doing quite so well in the financials as the years go on, has likely done little to correct that.
I love how people who don't have Facebook are excluded from voting. Not that I care, but there's no way Edward Snowden should suffer the indignity of appearing in the same list as Miley Cyrus for anything... and to especially lose to her?
- Yesterday AM you could auth in with Twitter or Facebook and vote without posting.
- Yesterday PM Twitter was no longer an option.
- Today AM Twitter is an option but not for auth, now it opens up an "intent" page with a pre-filled tweet.
My guess is that a) it didn't go viral enough without forcing a tweet, b) Twitter was easier to fake or c) the Twitter app got blacklisted for a high number of "revokes"
It's pretty saddening that some random programmer is going to let his own ego kill the chance to make a statement (yes, I know you personally know POY means nothing. The masses don't, move on.) about privacy and surveillance, all "for the lulz".
Wish they went for something else that wouldn't be easily mistaken for a genuine result. It could even encourage another pop singer next year to do a similar stunt or make this bizarre dancing look cool for young people.
I know that Miley Cyrus is definitely not person of the year. But if she were to win, that would be hilarious. I can't imagine a single person taking it seriously or respecting the result.
Is this some sort of cruel nightmare? This is everything that's wrong with the world.
Miley Cyrus essentially wore not very much on live TV and everyone went partially insane for 6 months. Snowden revealed a tyrannical regime to the world, risking his own freedom, so that we could take action and make the world a better place... yet here we are.
The latter is regarded as less important, less of a standpoint in human history than some meaningless celebs rear end.
To be fair, a large number of Americans would be of the type to have strong negative opinions of Miley Cyrus's latest antics. It's just they are also not the type to vote in online polls.
Holy crap ! I clicked the link and for a moment thought I'd been click-jacked to rate my camel toe. That should have an NSFW on it for anyone sensitive or with work colleagues around.
I remember when Julian Assange won that poll some time ago. To no one's surprise TIME didn't give him the title but as usual to some mainstream politics lackey.
[+] [-] eli|12 years ago|reply
A non-binding online poll to help pick who will be on the cover of a dying news magazine. Notable recent winners include Vladimir Putin and, uh, "you" as well as "A Protestor".
[+] [-] waylandsmithers|12 years ago|reply
Don't forget Hitler!
[+] [-] jrs99|12 years ago|reply
In a way, hacker news could make up an award based on internet votes and vote Miley Cyrus as the Greatest Creative Mind of the last 100 years. Wikipedia editors will be all over that.
[+] [-] unknown|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] kaonashi|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yebyen|12 years ago|reply
I'll give you a hint since the servers seem to be overloaded and right now I can't even vote for Snowden:
http://poy.time.com/2013/11/25/vote-now-who-should-be-times-...
where persons-name is the name of the person you wanted to vote for. You need to prove your identity with Twitter or Facebook. I have no idea if this is new or if it's how the poll has always been run, but the voting is open 'til Dec 4.
I'm afraid if I direct link, they're just going to see it as a voting ring and disqualify all of your votes. If you can even get the page to load. I am currently still waiting.
[+] [-] antsar|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Tobu|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] danso|12 years ago|reply
From last year: How 4Chan Made Kim Jong Un Time Readers' Person of the Year http://gizmodo.com/5968230/how-4chan-made-kim-jong-un-time-r...
Time for a overused saying: Never attribute to malice what you can attribute to incompetence.
[+] [-] tokenizer|12 years ago|reply
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but __don't rule out malice__"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor#Similar_quotatio...
[+] [-] DanBC|12 years ago|reply
Fixing the places of the top 21 people seems like an exploitable poll. I don't know how much has improved since then.
[+] [-] halviti|12 years ago|reply
Ballot stuffing can be done by anyone with motivation.
Vote Rigging (e.g. - deleting votes) can only be done by the people running the system.
[+] [-] ivarious|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kernel_sanders|12 years ago|reply
Someone should conduct a real, independent poll an award a POY award from the Internets.
[+] [-] onion2k|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adestefan|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] balabaster|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] balabaster|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Glyptodon|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tehwebguy|12 years ago|reply
- Yesterday PM Twitter was no longer an option.
- Today AM Twitter is an option but not for auth, now it opens up an "intent" page with a pre-filled tweet.
My guess is that a) it didn't go viral enough without forcing a tweet, b) Twitter was easier to fake or c) the Twitter app got blacklisted for a high number of "revokes"
[+] [-] jaachan|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] uptown|12 years ago|reply
http://www.dailydot.com/news/time-person-of-the-year-miley-c...
[+] [-] stelonix|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dpina|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] scrabble|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] prateek_mir|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] veganarchocap|12 years ago|reply
Miley Cyrus essentially wore not very much on live TV and everyone went partially insane for 6 months. Snowden revealed a tyrannical regime to the world, risking his own freedom, so that we could take action and make the world a better place... yet here we are.
The latter is regarded as less important, less of a standpoint in human history than some meaningless celebs rear end.
[+] [-] sard420|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] matthewnolandev|12 years ago|reply
2. If you want a real conspiracy, it looks like the major banks were conspiring with the FBI to assassinate Occupy Wall St leader via sniper. http://www.justiceonline.org/commentary/fbi-files-ows.html
3. Time still matters. The old and ignorant still turn to it for "news".
4. If you ever thought Snowden would beat Miley Cyrus, you obviously don't know much about America.
[+] [-] talmand|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ccarter84|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wehadfun|12 years ago|reply
CEO of Yahoo? (For making some teenager a millionaire) No
CEO of Twitter? (For taking the company public) No
CEO of Amazon? (For buying a newspaper) Maybe
CEO of Google? (Google does amazing things every day) Maybe
Pope? (I don't know enough about what he has done) Maybe
Person in charge of Obamacare.com? Hell no
Lebron James? Hell no
Angolena Jolie? Hell no
Hanna Montana? Hell no
Next in line to run Fed? No
Putin? (He is Snowdensitting, threw a big FU to the #1 democracy) Maybe
Obama? (Coverage for those with pre-existing conditions,forcing insurance companies to use premiums to pay for healthcare) Sure
Snowden? (Giving up freedom, family, to expose government missdeesds at 30) Sure
Mr. Syria? No
Everyone else? What did yall do?
[+] [-] showmerunner|12 years ago|reply
http://www.eonline.com/news/485526/miley-cyrus-leads-time-s-...
[+] [-] twilson|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eccp|12 years ago|reply
http://i.imgur.com/iwmk2vn.jpg
[+] [-] lbebber|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MatthiasP|12 years ago|reply