top | item 6807879

Time POY: Snowden's 200,000+ votes go missing, now behind Miley Cyrus

153 points| beaker52 | 12 years ago |poy.time.com | reply

71 comments

order
[+] eli|12 years ago|reply
It's hard to overstate how unimportant this is.

A non-binding online poll to help pick who will be on the cover of a dying news magazine. Notable recent winners include Vladimir Putin and, uh, "you" as well as "A Protestor".

[+] waylandsmithers|12 years ago|reply
| Notable previous winners include Vladimir Putin and, uh, "you" and "A Protestor".

Don't forget Hitler!

[+] jrs99|12 years ago|reply
Don't forget, Awesome Award based on internet votes will be spammed all over Wikipedia, providing free advertising that points to Time Magazine, and wikipedia editors believe any award is some authoritative measure of success.

In a way, hacker news could make up an award based on internet votes and vote Miley Cyrus as the Greatest Creative Mind of the last 100 years. Wikipedia editors will be all over that.

[+] kaonashi|12 years ago|reply
Unimportant, but revealing.
[+] yebyen|12 years ago|reply
This is the dumbest way to present a poll I have ever seen! There are 44 choices but you can either vote for "Miley Cyrus vs Jimmy Fallon" or click next 34 times and vote for Edward Snowden.

I'll give you a hint since the servers seem to be overloaded and right now I can't even vote for Snowden:

http://poy.time.com/2013/11/25/vote-now-who-should-be-times-...

where persons-name is the name of the person you wanted to vote for. You need to prove your identity with Twitter or Facebook. I have no idea if this is new or if it's how the poll has always been run, but the voting is open 'til Dec 4.

I'm afraid if I direct link, they're just going to see it as a voting ring and disqualify all of your votes. If you can even get the page to load. I am currently still waiting.

[+] danso|12 years ago|reply
PSA everyone: TIME Magazine's POY online technology has always been a POS, and TIME Magazine, not doing quite so well in the financials as the years go on, has likely done little to correct that.

From last year: How 4Chan Made Kim Jong Un Time Readers' Person of the Year http://gizmodo.com/5968230/how-4chan-made-kim-jong-un-time-r...

Time for a overused saying: Never attribute to malice what you can attribute to incompetence.

[+] DanBC|12 years ago|reply
Time is the same poll that was hacked to allow Moot to win, and for the names of the top of the list to read MARBLE CAKE ALSO THE GAME.

Fixing the places of the top 21 people seems like an exploitable poll. I don't know how much has improved since then.

[+] halviti|12 years ago|reply
You can't see the difference between ballot stuffing and vote rigging?

Ballot stuffing can be done by anyone with motivation.

Vote Rigging (e.g. - deleting votes) can only be done by the people running the system.

[+] ivarious|12 years ago|reply
It wasn't hacked, just gamed.
[+] kernel_sanders|12 years ago|reply
This is hilarious. I voted yesterday and Snowden had 99% of the vote. He deserves to win.

Someone should conduct a real, independent poll an award a POY award from the Internets.

[+] onion2k|12 years ago|reply
This is about as clear a sign that Time magazine has become irrelevant as you could ever wish for.
[+] adestefan|12 years ago|reply
It's a clear sign that Internet polls are as irrelevant as you could ever wish for.
[+] balabaster|12 years ago|reply
I love how people who don't have Facebook are excluded from voting. Not that I care, but there's no way Edward Snowden should suffer the indignity of appearing in the same list as Miley Cyrus for anything... and to especially lose to her?
[+] balabaster|12 years ago|reply
It's almost worth creating a Facebook account just to bring justice to this... and then deleting it.
[+] Glyptodon|12 years ago|reply
Pretty clear it's being hacked, especially when their site's been completely buggy for me every time I've tried to vote.
[+] tehwebguy|12 years ago|reply
- Yesterday AM you could auth in with Twitter or Facebook and vote without posting.

- Yesterday PM Twitter was no longer an option.

- Today AM Twitter is an option but not for auth, now it opens up an "intent" page with a pre-filled tweet.

My guess is that a) it didn't go viral enough without forcing a tweet, b) Twitter was easier to fake or c) the Twitter app got blacklisted for a high number of "revokes"

[+] jaachan|12 years ago|reply
Maybe they cleaned up a bunch of 'spam' votes?
[+] uptown|12 years ago|reply
Online polls are dumb, but here's some background on the current one:

http://www.dailydot.com/news/time-person-of-the-year-miley-c...

[+] stelonix|12 years ago|reply
It's pretty saddening that some random programmer is going to let his own ego kill the chance to make a statement (yes, I know you personally know POY means nothing. The masses don't, move on.) about privacy and surveillance, all "for the lulz".
[+] dpina|12 years ago|reply
Wish they went for something else that wouldn't be easily mistaken for a genuine result. It could even encourage another pop singer next year to do a similar stunt or make this bizarre dancing look cool for young people.
[+] scrabble|12 years ago|reply
I know that Miley Cyrus is definitely not person of the year. But if she were to win, that would be hilarious. I can't imagine a single person taking it seriously or respecting the result.
[+] prateek_mir|12 years ago|reply
more of a gimmick, The results will be completely different, ultimately the editors will decide.. clever way to generate hits :/
[+] veganarchocap|12 years ago|reply
Is this some sort of cruel nightmare? This is everything that's wrong with the world.

Miley Cyrus essentially wore not very much on live TV and everyone went partially insane for 6 months. Snowden revealed a tyrannical regime to the world, risking his own freedom, so that we could take action and make the world a better place... yet here we are.

The latter is regarded as less important, less of a standpoint in human history than some meaningless celebs rear end.

[+] sard420|12 years ago|reply
It is now, that's how your supposed to feel. History will tell a very different story. Miley will be just another singer/actress.
[+] matthewnolandev|12 years ago|reply
1. Is an anti Snowden old media conspiracy. (isn't everything?).

2. If you want a real conspiracy, it looks like the major banks were conspiring with the FBI to assassinate Occupy Wall St leader via sniper. http://www.justiceonline.org/commentary/fbi-files-ows.html

3. Time still matters. The old and ignorant still turn to it for "news".

4. If you ever thought Snowden would beat Miley Cyrus, you obviously don't know much about America.

[+] talmand|12 years ago|reply
To be fair, a large number of Americans would be of the type to have strong negative opinions of Miley Cyrus's latest antics. It's just they are also not the type to vote in online polls.
[+] ccarter84|12 years ago|reply
Re: 2 - got a page number you could point a lad to to help enlighten us? thx
[+] wehadfun|12 years ago|reply
I went through this list:

CEO of Yahoo? (For making some teenager a millionaire) No

CEO of Twitter? (For taking the company public) No

CEO of Amazon? (For buying a newspaper) Maybe

CEO of Google? (Google does amazing things every day) Maybe

Pope? (I don't know enough about what he has done) Maybe

Person in charge of Obamacare.com? Hell no

Lebron James? Hell no

Angolena Jolie? Hell no

Hanna Montana? Hell no

Next in line to run Fed? No

Putin? (He is Snowdensitting, threw a big FU to the #1 democracy) Maybe

Obama? (Coverage for those with pre-existing conditions,forcing insurance companies to use premiums to pay for healthcare) Sure

Snowden? (Giving up freedom, family, to expose government missdeesds at 30) Sure

Mr. Syria? No

Everyone else? What did yall do?

[+] eccp|12 years ago|reply
I'm dissapointed. I thought I would find a comment about moot on this post or at least a reference to this image ("trolling is a art"):

http://i.imgur.com/iwmk2vn.jpg

[+] lbebber|12 years ago|reply
Man, Miley Cyrus just being present on this list already discredits it completely.
[+] MatthiasP|12 years ago|reply
I remember when Julian Assange won that poll some time ago. To no one's surprise TIME didn't give him the title but as usual to some mainstream politics lackey.