This is very exciting. I know until it gets all the government certs and rubber stamps I won't be able to use it at work but if it is out the ball can start rolling as they say.
> Improved Application Performance and Isolation. Run applications in isolated and secure lightweight containers utilizing SELinux and resource management. Linux containers provide a method of isolating a process and simulating its environment inside a single host. It provides application sandboxing technology to run applications in a secure container environment, isolated from other applications running in the same host operating system environment. Linux containers are useful when multiple copies of an application or workload need to be run in isolation, but share environments and resources. [1]
Looks like there is a major shift in that they will support containers out of the box now. Hopefully we will see some type of GUI to create containers and manage cgroups. There has also been major effort assigned to getting containers working with OpenStack and Docker. You can manually download/compile LXC today, on RHEL 6.4, but it seems like a bit of a hack, since you need to figure out networking and LVM on your own, never mind building base container images. Should be interesting.
There's significant effort underway in the Docker community to get libvirt as a viable execution engine for Docker. Very similar to how you can choose between AUFS and LVM.
Exactly - if they support and test LXC now, and the market demands Docker a year into the lifecycle (RH generally don't add features between major releases, so it'd have to be worth it for them), it's still doable as it's a userspace addition.
"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 beta includes three desktops to match different work styles and preferences: GNOME 3, GNOME Classic, and KDE."
I know that RHEL is mainly used on servers, but this development looks significant to me. I look forward to an eventual CentOS 7 release with a choice of desktops.
From the draft of the new storage administration guide:
Btrfs is still being actively evaluated for stability during the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0 beta. The following target use cases will only be fully supported if it passes our tests:
* The system partition only use case. This will allow btrfs only to get used for system installation, not only for a user's data. Currently it is unclear whether this will be restricted to this single disk or not.
* Use btrfs for desktop and laptop users including their data partitions.
* Use btrfs as the base file system under scale out "big data" file systems, such as gluster and Ceph.
I was struck by that too, and came here to make the same comment.
Why do you suppose they went with XFS? Ext4 seems like the defacto file system these days, but I know a lot of people seem to prefer XFS for one reason or another. It's a surprise to me that RHEL decided to default too it.
I remember using XFS some years ago. It was blazing fast for anything involving large files.
It also had a bug, in that a power failure or kernel crash was liable to truncate some freshly-written open files to zero size. Anyone knows if this problem has been eliminated?
"All Java 7 packages (java-1.7.0-openjdk, java-1.7.0-oracle, java-1.7.0-ibm) in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 beta let you install multiple versions in parallel, similarly to the kernel."
With the next SLES also going systemd by default, Do you think this will force the hand of the few holdouts left? Going I can't see vendors wanting to support all of systemd, upstart, sysvinit.
How long were the beta periods for RHEL 4, 5, 6? I know there's no commitment, but I'd like to tighten my vague idea of how long the beta period will be. Right now, I guess more than a day and less than a year.
Can anyone explain a bit more about what happened to Red Hat? I'm about behind the history of this Distribution. Last time I read about it I found out that is paid and I never considered it, because of that. I'm using Slackware for most of my servers, but I don't know what is the target market or what is more special in Red Hat Enterprise.
I'm glad I can stay on 6.x until all the kinks are worked out with systemd. I was on whatever Fedora made the switch to systemd and it was pretty painful.
[+] [-] rdtsc|12 years ago|reply
Here is the list of all the detail (tech notes):
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_E...
You can see updated and deprecated packages as well as issues so far in beta.
[+] [-] polvi|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pantalaimon|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Zoomla|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] WestCoastJustin|12 years ago|reply
Looks like there is a major shift in that they will support containers out of the box now. Hopefully we will see some type of GUI to create containers and manage cgroups. There has also been major effort assigned to getting containers working with OpenStack and Docker. You can manually download/compile LXC today, on RHEL 6.4, but it seems like a bit of a hack, since you need to figure out networking and LVM on your own, never mind building base container images. Should be interesting.
[1] https://access.redhat.com/site/sites/default/files/pages/att...
[+] [-] andor|12 years ago|reply
The GUI for libvirt is called virt-manager: http://virt-manager.org/
[+] [-] qeorge|12 years ago|reply
Relevant interview w/ Alexander Larsson: http://opensource.com/business/13/11/docker-fedora-red-hat-c...
[+] [-] nickstinemates|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nailer|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 3am|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sharprazor|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] keithpeter|12 years ago|reply
I know that RHEL is mainly used on servers, but this development looks significant to me. I look forward to an eventual CentOS 7 release with a choice of desktops.
[+] [-] csmuk|12 years ago|reply
For me, it's the only Linux desktop which I can find which is reliable and works out of the box with all my hardware.
[+] [-] nailer|12 years ago|reply
Nice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#Features
[+] [-] sciurus|12 years ago|reply
Btrfs is still being actively evaluated for stability during the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0 beta. The following target use cases will only be fully supported if it passes our tests: * The system partition only use case. This will allow btrfs only to get used for system installation, not only for a user's data. Currently it is unclear whether this will be restricted to this single disk or not. * Use btrfs for desktop and laptop users including their data partitions. * Use btrfs as the base file system under scale out "big data" file systems, such as gluster and Ceph.
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_E...
[+] [-] sharprazor|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] vondur|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zx2c4|12 years ago|reply
Why do you suppose they went with XFS? Ext4 seems like the defacto file system these days, but I know a lot of people seem to prefer XFS for one reason or another. It's a surprise to me that RHEL decided to default too it.
Anybody care to shed some light?
[+] [-] JSno|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Florin_Andrei|12 years ago|reply
It also had a bug, in that a power failure or kernel crash was liable to truncate some freshly-written open files to zero size. Anyone knows if this problem has been eliminated?
[+] [-] chjohnst|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rodgerd|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Game_Ender|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rch|12 years ago|reply
This sounds pretty convenient to me.
[+] [-] catinsocks|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jlgaddis|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] keithpeter|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jlgaddis|12 years ago|reply
XFS is the default filesystem.
"Multiple required authentications" in OpenSSH. Nifty.
[+] [-] oofabz|12 years ago|reply
To some that may mean Thunderbird is complete and mature, but RedHat must believe that Thunderbird is now a dead end.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird/New_Release_and_Governa...
[+] [-] tirant|12 years ago|reply
"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 beta includes three desktops to match different work styles and preferences: GNOME 3, GNOME Classic, and KDE"
[+] [-] dschiptsov|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] keithpeter|12 years ago|reply
Suggests Fedora 19 package set and 3.10 kernel.
[+] [-] chjohnst|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jgillich|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Spiritus|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gerjomarty|12 years ago|reply
[1]: https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_E...
[+] [-] greut|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yxhuvud|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] emmelaich|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ts4z|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] diakritikal|12 years ago|reply
With the next SLES also going systemd by default, Do you think this will force the hand of the few holdouts left? Going I can't see vendors wanting to support all of systemd, upstart, sysvinit.
[+] [-] unknown|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] air|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thyrsus|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] derekp7|12 years ago|reply
RHEL 4 beta: Sep 27, 2004 / GA: Feb 15, 2005
RHEL 5 beta: Sep 7, 2006 / GA: Mar 15, 2007
RHEL 6 beta: Apr 21, 2010 / GA: Nov 9, 2010
[+] [-] svennek|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] drinchev|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] berkut|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] radoslawc|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] e40|12 years ago|reply