top | item 6903452 Is this the ugliest Website in existance today? 7 points| budman | 12 years ago |synlube.com 11 comments order hn newest [+] [-] coldtea|12 years ago|reply No. It's straight to the point, minimal markup, few distractions (with the exception of some bad color choices), fast to load too.There are some Web 3.0, responsive, all buzzwords included sites that are way more annoying than this. [+] [-] nnnnni|12 years ago|reply ...and the icons are VERY clear. [+] [-] willcate|12 years ago|reply Ugly it may be, but hey, it says right down at the bottom, "This web page was successfully Validated as: "HTML 5 with CSS level 3" and tested in all above browsers."So there. [+] [-] lttlrck|12 years ago|reply Maybe but I had a complete overview of what they sold within a couple of seconds... [+] [-] brianstorms|12 years ago|reply If you're going to criticize a website, at least spell "existence" correctly. [+] [-] mikecane|12 years ago|reply Oh please. This is still the champ: http://www.lingscars.com/ [+] [-] marquis|12 years ago|reply I love this woman. She knows what her site does to people. Her Dragon's Den episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtib4WZW_4M [+] [-] krapp|12 years ago|reply That's not ugly, that's a work of stupefying genius. [+] [-] Torgo|12 years ago|reply At least that one has an excuse, from the copyright it appears it was created in 1996. This was created in 2010: http://www.warrens.net/ [+] [-] krapp|12 years ago|reply All they need to do is tone down the colors.Red should never be used as the background for a website. Ever. [+] [-] arasmussen|12 years ago|reply Challenge Accepted.
[+] [-] coldtea|12 years ago|reply No. It's straight to the point, minimal markup, few distractions (with the exception of some bad color choices), fast to load too.There are some Web 3.0, responsive, all buzzwords included sites that are way more annoying than this. [+] [-] nnnnni|12 years ago|reply ...and the icons are VERY clear.
[+] [-] willcate|12 years ago|reply Ugly it may be, but hey, it says right down at the bottom, "This web page was successfully Validated as: "HTML 5 with CSS level 3" and tested in all above browsers."So there.
[+] [-] lttlrck|12 years ago|reply Maybe but I had a complete overview of what they sold within a couple of seconds...
[+] [-] brianstorms|12 years ago|reply If you're going to criticize a website, at least spell "existence" correctly.
[+] [-] mikecane|12 years ago|reply Oh please. This is still the champ: http://www.lingscars.com/ [+] [-] marquis|12 years ago|reply I love this woman. She knows what her site does to people. Her Dragon's Den episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtib4WZW_4M [+] [-] krapp|12 years ago|reply That's not ugly, that's a work of stupefying genius.
[+] [-] marquis|12 years ago|reply I love this woman. She knows what her site does to people. Her Dragon's Den episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtib4WZW_4M
[+] [-] Torgo|12 years ago|reply At least that one has an excuse, from the copyright it appears it was created in 1996. This was created in 2010: http://www.warrens.net/
[+] [-] krapp|12 years ago|reply All they need to do is tone down the colors.Red should never be used as the background for a website. Ever.
[+] [-] coldtea|12 years ago|reply
There are some Web 3.0, responsive, all buzzwords included sites that are way more annoying than this.
[+] [-] nnnnni|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] willcate|12 years ago|reply
So there.
[+] [-] lttlrck|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] brianstorms|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikecane|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] marquis|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] krapp|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Torgo|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] krapp|12 years ago|reply
Red should never be used as the background for a website. Ever.
[+] [-] arasmussen|12 years ago|reply