That was such a horribly designed UI. I had no idea what I am looking at and why. Google used to all about simplicity. I remember in prior years these kind of posts always had graphs and considerable text explaining trends. Its like someone there realized they are JS experts.
You seriously mean to tell me that the most popular search on Google for 2013 is 'Paul Walker' followed by 'iPhone 5s'? What? Surely 'Weather' would be higher. I simply don't know what I'm looking at here.
Fairly sure they've filtered out what might constitute "low importance" searched like terms such as 'weather'. Searches for the weather probably remain relatively stable and don't really tell us anything.
I imagine this is a variant of a Latent Dirichlet Allocation[0]. Informally, this will identify words "most associated" with 2013, which is not the same thing as the most searched words in 2013.
Put another way, unless there's a huge spike of interest in the weather in 2013 compared to other years, "weather" won't be included.
Scrolling is backwards on my Mac. I'm using the default ("natural") scrolling, where swiping up scrolls down, but this page is set to scroll down with a swipe down.
Probably has to do with the fact that they're rendering the images in a canvas element rather than plain old HTML.
It's also broken on iPads. You can't see the bottom nav in portrait and the site is slightly too large for the viewport when viewed in landscape.
That would make sense if this were something that was intended to be useful and meaningful. I think this is just supposed to remind you that Google is a thing.
The video doesn't load for me on Firefox. It is probably just a bug and will be fixed but it coincidentally prints the correct picture of Google's current stance on browser compatibility.
Anyone else thinks that the silent conversion tactics are slowly becoming more obvious?
The video appears to be an mp4 (the network monitor says so) and it should work fine (it does here). Please ensure you have the latest FF version, available from https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ (in case the update fails).
While I read almost every HN post I saw about Snowden, I don't think I searched his name at all. In fact, I can't remember searching anything news related this year. I'm sure I have, but its really not necessary anymore. I wonder if others are starting to get into similar patterns.
I'm usually quite impressed by Google's Zeitgeist videos, this one was disappointing however. It's short (a minute shorter than 2012 and 2011), doesn't include many of the important events of the year, and is rather uninspiring. What happened?
I think it's just a default Google thing. Basically, it notices you're logged in but you haven't entered your password for a while, so it prompts you to login again.
Instead, I just clicked 'Log out and log in as a different user', closed the tab, and clicked the link again on HN, and it worked just fine.
So in short, it doesn't require you to be logged in, unless you are, at which point you have to log in again.
Chrome on Windows 7 bug report: back button doesn't work, mouse wheel doesn't work (scrolls at infinitesimal speed), touch-screen style controls which don't work well with a mouse (click&drag, besides not being intuitive with a mouse, is also broken because it navigates to the selected item on mouse button release)
The first few times i visited this , i was looking for a way to access more content then quit half way round.
I tried scrolling down , it didn't work .
I had to click a link on the left corner of my screen which wasn't even that visible to me.
Affordance = 0.
[+] [-] Keyframe|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] josteink|12 years ago|reply
It renders incorrectly, had zero info and just shows me pictures of Hollywood celebrities.
[+] [-] agildehaus|12 years ago|reply
Recall that Google at one time never had TV advertisements. Now you can't turn the damn thing on without seeing one.
[+] [-] yalogin|12 years ago|reply
That was such a horribly designed UI. I had no idea what I am looking at and why. Google used to all about simplicity. I remember in prior years these kind of posts always had graphs and considerable text explaining trends. Its like someone there realized they are JS experts.
[+] [-] jlarocco|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] scholia|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] schandur|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nettletea|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chaz|12 years ago|reply
http://www.google.com/trends/topcharts?date=2013
[+] [-] aroch|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fvrghl|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chimeracoder|12 years ago|reply
Put another way, unless there's a huge spike of interest in the weather in 2013 compared to other years, "weather" won't be included.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_dirichlet_allocation
[+] [-] martingordon|12 years ago|reply
Probably has to do with the fact that they're rendering the images in a canvas element rather than plain old HTML.
It's also broken on iPads. You can't see the bottom nav in portrait and the site is slightly too large for the viewport when viewed in landscape.
[+] [-] CaveTech|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joecurry|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] uncoder0|12 years ago|reply
Edit: Apparently this is linked in the bottom left corner of the page... totally missed it. What an effective site design.
[+] [-] wavefunction|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sgustard|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] eamsen|12 years ago|reply
The video doesn't load for me on Firefox. It is probably just a bug and will be fixed but it coincidentally prints the correct picture of Google's current stance on browser compatibility. Anyone else thinks that the silent conversion tactics are slowly becoming more obvious?
[+] [-] yapcguy|12 years ago|reply
It's exactly the kind of maudlin crap we have come to expect from politically correct tech companies.
[+] [-] dingaling|12 years ago|reply
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Lv-sY_z8MNs
Perhaps you don't have Flash installed, you lucky thing.
[+] [-] brokenparser|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] franze|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] scrrr|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mcgwiz|12 years ago|reply
Also, didn't find any mention of NSA or Snowden. Sadly, I wasn't surprised.
[+] [-] eamsen|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] beaker52|12 years ago|reply
Goes to show my assumption that he would be says that I'm subject to a large degree of bias.
[+] [-] dec0dedab0de|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] k-mcgrady|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ouggnay|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] xemoka|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oneeyedpigeon|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nettletea|12 years ago|reply
Stealing my touch scroll isn't that nice either. I struggled to read beyond the fold.
[+] [-] headgasket|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] VladRussian2|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hsivonen|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gpmcadam|12 years ago|reply
Instead, I just clicked 'Log out and log in as a different user', closed the tab, and clicked the link again on HN, and it worked just fine.
So in short, it doesn't require you to be logged in, unless you are, at which point you have to log in again.
Bizarre.
[+] [-] aasarava|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aaronetz|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fmax30|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chacham15|12 years ago|reply
To make this more clear: Snowden was the top Google search for many days, perhaps as long as the incident of Paul Walkers death until now.
[+] [-] jmedwards|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] hartator|12 years ago|reply
Showing a woman with a scarf...
Come on google, just go already.
[+] [-] CisSovereign|12 years ago|reply