top | item 6921029

Google Zeitgeist 2013

57 points| martinbc | 12 years ago |google.com

61 comments

order
[+] Keyframe|12 years ago|reply
What a shitty user experience. What changed at google? They used to have these rather simple, useful, UIs.
[+] josteink|12 years ago|reply
I don't even know what I'm looking at here.

It renders incorrectly, had zero info and just shows me pictures of Hollywood celebrities.

[+] agildehaus|12 years ago|reply
Designers and product managers have taken the reigns from the engineers.

Recall that Google at one time never had TV advertisements. Now you can't turn the damn thing on without seeing one.

[+] yalogin|12 years ago|reply
Wow. I am not the only one that felt like this.

That was such a horribly designed UI. I had no idea what I am looking at and why. Google used to all about simplicity. I remember in prior years these kind of posts always had graphs and considerable text explaining trends. Its like someone there realized they are JS experts.

[+] jlarocco|12 years ago|reply
In Chrome I get an empty dark blue screen unless I tell Ghostery not to block the Google +1 tracker.
[+] scholia|12 years ago|reply
I hit the button to say exactly that, but you beat me to it. It's unbelievably bad, even by Google's rapidly declining standards....
[+] schandur|12 years ago|reply
I gave the video about 2 seconds before closing the tab.
[+] nettletea|12 years ago|reply
You seriously mean to tell me that the most popular search on Google for 2013 is 'Paul Walker' followed by 'iPhone 5s'? What? Surely 'Weather' would be higher. I simply don't know what I'm looking at here.
[+] aroch|12 years ago|reply
Fairly sure they've filtered out what might constitute "low importance" searched like terms such as 'weather'. Searches for the weather probably remain relatively stable and don't really tell us anything.
[+] fvrghl|12 years ago|reply
I also wondered why the death of Paul Walker was in the video. Surely Lou Reed was more influential, yet his death wasn't mentioned.
[+] chimeracoder|12 years ago|reply
I imagine this is a variant of a Latent Dirichlet Allocation[0]. Informally, this will identify words "most associated" with 2013, which is not the same thing as the most searched words in 2013.

Put another way, unless there's a huge spike of interest in the weather in 2013 compared to other years, "weather" won't be included.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_dirichlet_allocation

[+] martingordon|12 years ago|reply
Scrolling is backwards on my Mac. I'm using the default ("natural") scrolling, where swiping up scrolls down, but this page is set to scroll down with a swipe down.

Probably has to do with the fact that they're rendering the images in a canvas element rather than plain old HTML.

It's also broken on iPads. You can't see the bottom nav in portrait and the site is slightly too large for the viewport when viewed in landscape.

[+] CaveTech|12 years ago|reply
I think it might be intentional. I don't use natural scrolling and it's broken for me as well.
[+] joecurry|12 years ago|reply
I would prefer a .txt file list over this, I can't even tell the order without individual clicks.
[+] wavefunction|12 years ago|reply
That would make sense if this were something that was intended to be useful and meaningful. I think this is just supposed to remind you that Google is a thing.
[+] sgustard|12 years ago|reply
The actual data is so boring (hint: Miley Cyrus) that it's purely an exercise in wasteful over-engineering.
[+] eamsen|12 years ago|reply
Google Zeitgeist 2013: black box.

The video doesn't load for me on Firefox. It is probably just a bug and will be fixed but it coincidentally prints the correct picture of Google's current stance on browser compatibility. Anyone else thinks that the silent conversion tactics are slowly becoming more obvious?

[+] yapcguy|12 years ago|reply
Consider yourself fortunate you can't watch the video.

It's exactly the kind of maudlin crap we have come to expect from politically correct tech companies.

[+] franze|12 years ago|reply
what a horrible, horrible browsing experience on desktop. this is a complete new kind of swipeware/pseudo-metro crap...
[+] scrrr|12 years ago|reply
yeah, it's very non-Google somehow..
[+] mcgwiz|12 years ago|reply
Did I miss something or is 2013 already over?

Also, didn't find any mention of NSA or Snowden. Sadly, I wasn't surprised.

[+] eamsen|12 years ago|reply
Snowden is #97 for me. I suspect that the results are localized (Germany for me).
[+] beaker52|12 years ago|reply
Edward Snowden not in top 100.

Goes to show my assumption that he would be says that I'm subject to a large degree of bias.

[+] dec0dedab0de|12 years ago|reply
While I read almost every HN post I saw about Snowden, I don't think I searched his name at all. In fact, I can't remember searching anything news related this year. I'm sure I have, but its really not necessary anymore. I wonder if others are starting to get into similar patterns.
[+] k-mcgrady|12 years ago|reply
Is the top 100 actually the top 100? I'm sure it's filtered quite a bit.
[+] xemoka|12 years ago|reply
I'm usually quite impressed by Google's Zeitgeist videos, this one was disappointing however. It's short (a minute shorter than 2012 and 2011), doesn't include many of the important events of the year, and is rather uninspiring. What happened?
[+] oneeyedpigeon|12 years ago|reply
Breaks the back button :-(
[+] nettletea|12 years ago|reply
It's a hideous UI, all I want is a text list of top searches for the year, and to be able to filter by category.

Stealing my touch scroll isn't that nice either. I struggled to read beyond the fold.

[+] VladRussian2|12 years ago|reply
nice. Black dead rectangle in the center of bluish background. No interaction anywhere. Firefox. If it doesn't work in FF, it doesn't work.
[+] hsivonen|12 years ago|reply
Requires login? Why?
[+] gpmcadam|12 years ago|reply
I think it's just a default Google thing. Basically, it notices you're logged in but you haven't entered your password for a while, so it prompts you to login again.

Instead, I just clicked 'Log out and log in as a different user', closed the tab, and clicked the link again on HN, and it worked just fine.

So in short, it doesn't require you to be logged in, unless you are, at which point you have to log in again.

Bizarre.

[+] aasarava|12 years ago|reply
I wonder if most people didn't even notice that because they remain logged in to Google services all the time.
[+] aaronetz|12 years ago|reply
Chrome on Windows 7 bug report: back button doesn't work, mouse wheel doesn't work (scrolls at infinitesimal speed), touch-screen style controls which don't work well with a mouse (click&drag, besides not being intuitive with a mouse, is also broken because it navigates to the selected item on mouse button release)
[+] fmax30|12 years ago|reply
The first few times i visited this , i was looking for a way to access more content then quit half way round. I tried scrolling down , it didn't work . I had to click a link on the left corner of my screen which wasn't even that visible to me. Affordance = 0.
[+] chacham15|12 years ago|reply
There must be something wrong with this list when Edward Snowden is at #97 and Paul Walker is #2.

To make this more clear: Snowden was the top Google search for many days, perhaps as long as the incident of Paul Walkers death until now.

[+] hartator|12 years ago|reply
"When you finally get at that's point of acceptance, there is nothing more beautiful"

Showing a woman with a scarf...

Come on google, just go already.

[+] CisSovereign|12 years ago|reply
I'm on chrome and it was super clunky. Skipped a ton on scroll.