top | item 6951170

Scientists Send Text Message Using Vodka

29 points| dylandrop | 12 years ago |voanews.com

15 comments

order
[+] pavel_lishin|12 years ago|reply
A rather linkbaity headline; I send text messages using vodka pretty often, and then I have to check to see what exactly I said in the morning.

Interesting, though. Seems like a series of breezes could seriously impact the communication, though, making the whole robots-in-the-sewer system not work quite so well.

[+] stirno|12 years ago|reply
MITM issues are far more uhh... interesting ... as well.
[+] ColinWright|12 years ago|reply
[+] archgoon|12 years ago|reply
The actual study, which you have buried in that list of links, is actually quite nice.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjourna...

They achieved about .3 bits per second.

Components needed to replicate:

* DuroBlast Electronic Spray

* Arduino: https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11021

Alcohol Sensors:

* MQ-303a : http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/alcohol-sensor-mq303a-p-549...

* MQ-3 : https://www.sparkfun.com/products/8880

* MR513 : http://www.cooking-hacks.com/mr513-alcohol-high-accuracy

So their setup is probably about $100

[+] plg|12 years ago|reply
I would be more interested if they sent vodka using text message
[+] gmaslov|12 years ago|reply
Text messages are only the relatively boring first step in this kind of project. If these guys go on to implement IP/Vodka they can proudly follow in the footsteps of such hacks as RFC 1149 :-) "The network smells a little slow today"
[+] shurcooL|12 years ago|reply
Pretty neat that I know the people in this article personally.
[+] downer87|12 years ago|reply
So what's the baud rate?

I might guess something like one bit, every 10 seconds?

[+] robotfelix|12 years ago|reply
Given huge number of possible molecules and the relatively slow nature of wafting them around the room, I suspect they plan to pack a lot more that 1 bit of information in each molecule!
[+] singular|12 years ago|reply
I think it's worth exploring non-standard means of establishing networks no matter how ostensibly silly as they can come in extremely useful when e.g. governments try to restrict internet access in oppressive countries or natural disasters occur, etc.

Though I'm not sure if this particular example is of much use ;-)

[+] drakaal|12 years ago|reply
I think the Native Americans did the same thing with smoke. "Smoke" for 1, "no smoke" for zero. And they went way further than across the room.
[+] Houshalter|12 years ago|reply
Sort of, but they didn't smell the smoke signal, just look at it. It's cool that we can automate it too.