I loathe AT&T. It mistreats employees and customers. It overcharges and delivers astonishingly poor service. It makes regular billing "mistakes". It willingly, almost gleefully, assists in the violation of its customers rights and privacy. It is a paragon of inefficiency. It fights against progress to keep its anachronistic business model relevant. It uses the legal system as a club. And it ensures that any actions brought against it can at best be Pyrrhic victories.
In short, it is truly every bad thing Microsoft has ever been alleged to be and worse. I don't own an iPhone solely because I want less to do with AT&T than I do now.
In 2004 I moved to a city where my AT&T TDMA phone was permanently roaming. I didn't pay roaming charges because my plan with AT&T covered my roaming charges.
Months later, AT&T set up a single TDMA tower in my area. Because AT&T phones were service provider locked, my phone and hundreds of others like it were forced to use that single tower. Overnight my phone went from having perfect signal everywhere I went, to just short of useless.
Every single AT&T representative that I talked to swore up and down that the reason I was getting poor service was not their fault, that the problem was with my phone and that I should get a new phone.
Since this happened just as AT&T was moving from TDMA to GSM, I am guessing that this was their way of forcing their customers to move to GSM. I can understand the business case for moving customers to GSM, what I can't understand is why AT&T would do so by using trickery and lies.
I will always remember AT&T's shady tactics and blatant deceit and will never give them another cent of my money - I will purchase an iPhone the second it is officially available on another provider.
This is also the company whose sales reps swear up and down, to this day, that they don't offer dry loop DSL "because there is no demand".
Of course, if you know the magic phone number, you can call the dry loop division directly, and they are as helpful as can be. I asked one once why they were so hidden... she answered: politics.
"It fights against progress to keep its anachronistic business model relevant."
I'd like to comment on that. I live in a city in which AT&T started a test of bandwidth caps. Depending on your connection type, you can download anywhere from 5 gigs to 60 gigs, and it's $1 per gig after your limit.
I watch HD video, stream music, download games from steam and software from the apt repositories, etc etc, and I've used 50 gigs this month.
Sadly, the only other ISP in town is Charter, and they have notoriously bad service in my area.
I've had an iPhone on AT&T for 2 years without any issues. No dropped calls or billing mistakes and no issues with customer service. The rates that they charge are nearly identical to the other wireless providers for voice + data.
I'm not saying that AT&T has not had these problems, but your comment does not exemplify the experiences of the majority of their customers.
How about one of us create a landing page with a bullet lists of AT&T complaints? I don't care enough but we could all link to the page at the bottom of our websites just with the word ATT[1] and soon enough when people search for AT&T's corporate page, they will find a list of complaints. People will take note and thus AT&T will be forced to take note as well. On top of that:
- Update your twitter with your AT&T complaint
and give it the hashtag #ATT.
- Contact The Consumerist Blog, try to
get their awareness (is anyone connected to them?).
- Any other ideas?
Let's start a movement.
Stop complaining and start acting.
I already did my part, I'm no longer an ATT customer.
I'm not seeing Siegler acknowledge whether or not he had enabled TechCrunch's "safe" AT&T tethering hack, which is notorious for messing up voicemail. This despite multiple commenters asking him.
(I think TC readers may have another nasty surprise waiting when AT&T finally gets to running 'awk' on the logfiles those tethering sessions land in.)
Apple should seriously consider buying Sprint. When they first struck a deal with Cingular one of my first thoughts was they were picking a carrier that was within their reach to purchase down the road. Obviously AT&T had the same idea though. Given Apple's position in mobile electronics it would make a lot of sense to own their own data network. EVDO data in every device. iTunes Store over EVDO on every iPod. Extremely aggressive first party iPhone pricing on Sprint (while still selling a GSM model at a higher cost) They could really shake things up if they wanted to.
Apple would enjoy many benefits from buying a telecom company, but there's one factor that would almost certainly prevent it: anything bad the telecom did would then be blamed by the public (even if completely irrationally) on Apple. Apple makes most of their money from being the "sexy consumer electronics company", and no matter how you try to spin a telecom, you can't make it sexy. The only way Apple could successfully buy out a telecom would involve replacing the entire culture of the telecom with Apple's own dedication-to-snobby-perfection culture, which itself would involve replacing most of the employees and management with Apple's own. They'd have no one left to make computers!
That is actually possible too, since Sprint's market cap is only $12.8b, and Apple's is $135b. A deal that is part cash, mostly Apple stock would probably go down well with current Sprint shareholders (the ones I know are fairly pessimistic about Sprint's future, but are holding in the hopes that the Pre helps, or it gets acquired for a premium).
Sprint definitely has a history of horrible customer service, which maybe Apple could finally slay. I live in their home market (KC), so obviously coverage is great here, but not sure if it would be sufficient nationwide to be worth it to Apple. That said, Amazon apparently thinks coverage is sufficient for the Kindle.
Definitely an interesting idea... who knows if Apple really wants to bother running the network though. It could take a while to raise network and customer service quality to meet Apple-customer expectations (ie. perfection), tarnishing Apple's hard-earned brand name along the way. Claiming all the successes (the device) and blaming all the problems (the network) on AT&T could be convenient.
What I get out of this is that it's best to avoid doing business with Apple's customers. (Nobody has ever filed a class-action lawsuit against Dell for using 6-bit LCDs instead of 8-bit LCDs.)
They are much more demanding than the average customer -- Apple makes AT&T provide special exclusive features, and then their customers hold them to higher standards. "There isn't enough bandwidth." "Torrents download too slowly!" "Everything is too expensive."
Not to sound like an AT&T fanboi, but the other providers are just as bad. The pricing is the same, you get locked in, and the bandwidth isn't even as good. (At least AT&T lets me use any GSM phone. Try that with Verizon.) The US just doesn't have the infrastructure to provide exceptional cell-phone service (like, say, Japan does; with millions of people in a very tiny space). With people constantly demanding more bandwidth for less money, I can't imagine there is much room in the budget to upgrade the 3G network in the middle of nowhere. Sorry, it's the reality of living so spread apart.
No this isn't about picky Apple fans. AT&T is truly shitty. I also switched from Verizon to AT&T for the iPhone and I loathe every minute I have to spend on AT&T's shitty network. Here in Chicago I drop every other call on average, and the ones that manage to stay up are usually full of garbled noise. No signal inside buildings that I used to get full strength on Verizon.
Still no MMS even though their other phones have had the feature for ages. God forbid you want to use the network in a crowded venue - Solider Field, Wrigley, Lollapalooza, network is shit anytime there are more than 5000 people nearby. Simply unacceptable service in a city this size.
> Not to sound like an AT&T fanboi, but the other providers are just as bad. The pricing is the same, you get locked in, and the bandwidth isn't even as good
Sure, AT&T is "just as bad." I am convinced that the phone carriers are operating as a cartel. They fix prices. Their primary business model is "how much can we screw the consumer and get away with it?" Just because they all do it isn't an excuse.
honestly, this is the BEST TC post I have read in a long while. Extremely well written / crafted and contains serious, sensible points.
I’m so pissed off that I kind of want to call AT&T and demand that they call each of the people I missed calls from and personally apologize. Instead, I’m writing them this very public condemnation.
I would do the former. I really would. Here in the UK phone companies have such a monopoly amongst themselves.
As a consumer I feel regularly screwed. At the moment I am stuck with a shit 18 month old phone because it is out of warranty and upgrading to a newer model (despite being a 10 yr long customer of my current company!) is too expensive outside of the limited free upgrade time.
I sympathize heavily. No one hacks together a phone startup because it is such a closed business. Look how much awesome stuff developed when starting up on the web becomes easy - I hope mobile networks go the same way.
At the moment I am stuck with a shit 18 month old phone because it is out of warranty and upgrading to a newer model (despite being a 10 yr long customer of my current company!) is too expensive outside of the limited free upgrade time.
This may surprise you, but that's actually how much a phone costs. Turns out we haven't quite gotten them to grow on trees yet.
I can't think of any industry (other than video gaming) where someone gives you something for free so you'll use their service; count the one free phone every 2 years as a blessing. If you want the latest-and-greatest, you have to buy it, just like with everything else.
What do you mean by "Here in the UK phone companies have such a monopoly amongst themselves."?
There's a choice between voda, orange, t, o2 and others and it doesn't seem so bad. Of course O2 seems to have the same problems like at&t - not good enough infrastructure and not enough coverage to handle iphones properly (and now they will get Pre as well, unfortunately). And there are crappy carriers like Three which should DIAF long ago. But otherwise, many offers are sensible.
You're forced to go the 18 months contract route mostly when you're buying the cheapest stuff, which is fair enough. Otherwise, I don't think the situation is bad at all.
I have to disagree about the quality of the composition of the article. While the topic is interesting and even a bit redeeming for TC, the writing falls short of good journalism.
I'm not sure mobile networks will ever go the way of the web startup. I think they had been there before, in their early days.
If anything, we ought to hope the web startup doesn't go the way of mobile service providers...
so at&t can pay a ton of money to upgrade its network (which apparently isn't going to be that much faster) and then lose the exclusive contract with apple, in the process losing lots of customers and no longer gaining new customers when apple releases new iphones.
or, it can not upgrade its network and just pay apple a much smaller amount to keep them locked into at&t, keeping all of its locked-in customers while increasing their prices, and continue to get new customers every time apple comes out with a new iphone. apple gets to sell more phones while pointing the finger at at&t for any network problems.
How do you figure that "and pay apple a much smaller amount to..." bit? If it's in Apple's best interests to leave, then they will. I certainly don't think that Apple will collude with AT&T to perpetuate shitty service.
Wow, I just checked the voicemail on my iPhone and I had 12 (!) voicemails queued up with no indications that I had waiting messages.
AT&T service has been horrible since I got my iPhone (~ 1 year). I kept a blackberry on Verizon, which is my primary "phone" (the iPhone has been more for email/web). However, I have a VoIP # as my primary phone that rings my desk, vzw phone and att phone all at once. Apparently a good number of calls ended up in my att mailbox, with no indications.
I totally agree that my new iPhone is basically an iPod touch. I get no AT&T signal at my house and marginal signal elsewhere. And it looks like I don't even get voicemails reliably. I should cancel my AT&T contract (there is a 30 day grace period) and get an iPod touch instead. There is no phone in the iPhone thanks to AT&T.
I "cancelled" my AT&T account a few months ago. Somehow the account is still open, but accumulating monthly negative charges (credit.) No script from their customer support can resolve this issue. Technical glitches can be fascinating and this company has no shortage in my experiences with them.
[+] [-] spoondan|16 years ago|reply
In short, it is truly every bad thing Microsoft has ever been alleged to be and worse. I don't own an iPhone solely because I want less to do with AT&T than I do now.
[+] [-] tsetse-fly|16 years ago|reply
Verizon has a history of crippling its phones. Sprint has horrible customer service. T-Mobile has very little coverage. There are no good carriers.
[+] [-] jf|16 years ago|reply
Months later, AT&T set up a single TDMA tower in my area. Because AT&T phones were service provider locked, my phone and hundreds of others like it were forced to use that single tower. Overnight my phone went from having perfect signal everywhere I went, to just short of useless.
Every single AT&T representative that I talked to swore up and down that the reason I was getting poor service was not their fault, that the problem was with my phone and that I should get a new phone.
Since this happened just as AT&T was moving from TDMA to GSM, I am guessing that this was their way of forcing their customers to move to GSM. I can understand the business case for moving customers to GSM, what I can't understand is why AT&T would do so by using trickery and lies.
I will always remember AT&T's shady tactics and blatant deceit and will never give them another cent of my money - I will purchase an iPhone the second it is officially available on another provider.
[+] [-] Xichekolas|16 years ago|reply
Of course, if you know the magic phone number, you can call the dry loop division directly, and they are as helpful as can be. I asked one once why they were so hidden... she answered: politics.
[+] [-] 3dFlatLander|16 years ago|reply
I'd like to comment on that. I live in a city in which AT&T started a test of bandwidth caps. Depending on your connection type, you can download anywhere from 5 gigs to 60 gigs, and it's $1 per gig after your limit.
I watch HD video, stream music, download games from steam and software from the apt repositories, etc etc, and I've used 50 gigs this month.
Sadly, the only other ISP in town is Charter, and they have notoriously bad service in my area.
[+] [-] eb|16 years ago|reply
I've had an iPhone on AT&T for 2 years without any issues. No dropped calls or billing mistakes and no issues with customer service. The rates that they charge are nearly identical to the other wireless providers for voice + data.
I'm not saying that AT&T has not had these problems, but your comment does not exemplify the experiences of the majority of their customers.
[+] [-] quizbiz|16 years ago|reply
Stop complaining and start acting.
I already did my part, I'm no longer an ATT customer.
---
[1] Based on http://www.google.com/trends?q=AT%26T%2C+AT+and+T%2C+ATT
[+] [-] tptacek|16 years ago|reply
(I think TC readers may have another nasty surprise waiting when AT&T finally gets to running 'awk' on the logfiles those tethering sessions land in.)
[+] [-] tsetse-fly|16 years ago|reply
There were a slew of people on the MacRumors forums that were tethering and didn't realize that their visual voicemail had been broken for days.
[+] [-] jsz0|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] derefr|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Xichekolas|16 years ago|reply
Sprint definitely has a history of horrible customer service, which maybe Apple could finally slay. I live in their home market (KC), so obviously coverage is great here, but not sure if it would be sufficient nationwide to be worth it to Apple. That said, Amazon apparently thinks coverage is sufficient for the Kindle.
Definitely an interesting idea... who knows if Apple really wants to bother running the network though. It could take a while to raise network and customer service quality to meet Apple-customer expectations (ie. perfection), tarnishing Apple's hard-earned brand name along the way. Claiming all the successes (the device) and blaming all the problems (the network) on AT&T could be convenient.
[+] [-] jrockway|16 years ago|reply
They are much more demanding than the average customer -- Apple makes AT&T provide special exclusive features, and then their customers hold them to higher standards. "There isn't enough bandwidth." "Torrents download too slowly!" "Everything is too expensive."
Not to sound like an AT&T fanboi, but the other providers are just as bad. The pricing is the same, you get locked in, and the bandwidth isn't even as good. (At least AT&T lets me use any GSM phone. Try that with Verizon.) The US just doesn't have the infrastructure to provide exceptional cell-phone service (like, say, Japan does; with millions of people in a very tiny space). With people constantly demanding more bandwidth for less money, I can't imagine there is much room in the budget to upgrade the 3G network in the middle of nowhere. Sorry, it's the reality of living so spread apart.
[+] [-] maukdaddy|16 years ago|reply
Still no MMS even though their other phones have had the feature for ages. God forbid you want to use the network in a crowded venue - Solider Field, Wrigley, Lollapalooza, network is shit anytime there are more than 5000 people nearby. Simply unacceptable service in a city this size.
[+] [-] vaksel|16 years ago|reply
The "we are too spread" argument may work if you get shitty service in the middle of nowhere, but its unacceptable for large metro areas like NYC, SF
[+] [-] jcromartie|16 years ago|reply
Sure, AT&T is "just as bad." I am convinced that the phone carriers are operating as a cartel. They fix prices. Their primary business model is "how much can we screw the consumer and get away with it?" Just because they all do it isn't an excuse.
[+] [-] ErrantX|16 years ago|reply
I’m so pissed off that I kind of want to call AT&T and demand that they call each of the people I missed calls from and personally apologize. Instead, I’m writing them this very public condemnation.
I would do the former. I really would. Here in the UK phone companies have such a monopoly amongst themselves.
As a consumer I feel regularly screwed. At the moment I am stuck with a shit 18 month old phone because it is out of warranty and upgrading to a newer model (despite being a 10 yr long customer of my current company!) is too expensive outside of the limited free upgrade time.
I sympathize heavily. No one hacks together a phone startup because it is such a closed business. Look how much awesome stuff developed when starting up on the web becomes easy - I hope mobile networks go the same way.
[+] [-] jrockway|16 years ago|reply
This may surprise you, but that's actually how much a phone costs. Turns out we haven't quite gotten them to grow on trees yet.
I can't think of any industry (other than video gaming) where someone gives you something for free so you'll use their service; count the one free phone every 2 years as a blessing. If you want the latest-and-greatest, you have to buy it, just like with everything else.
[+] [-] viraptor|16 years ago|reply
There's a choice between voda, orange, t, o2 and others and it doesn't seem so bad. Of course O2 seems to have the same problems like at&t - not good enough infrastructure and not enough coverage to handle iphones properly (and now they will get Pre as well, unfortunately). And there are crappy carriers like Three which should DIAF long ago. But otherwise, many offers are sensible.
You're forced to go the 18 months contract route mostly when you're buying the cheapest stuff, which is fair enough. Otherwise, I don't think the situation is bad at all.
[+] [-] tbeseda|16 years ago|reply
I'm not sure mobile networks will ever go the way of the web startup. I think they had been there before, in their early days. If anything, we ought to hope the web startup doesn't go the way of mobile service providers...
[+] [-] there|16 years ago|reply
or, it can not upgrade its network and just pay apple a much smaller amount to keep them locked into at&t, keeping all of its locked-in customers while increasing their prices, and continue to get new customers every time apple comes out with a new iphone. apple gets to sell more phones while pointing the finger at at&t for any network problems.
i wonder which one they'll do...
[+] [-] stavrianos|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] brk|16 years ago|reply
AT&T service has been horrible since I got my iPhone (~ 1 year). I kept a blackberry on Verizon, which is my primary "phone" (the iPhone has been more for email/web). However, I have a VoIP # as my primary phone that rings my desk, vzw phone and att phone all at once. Apparently a good number of calls ended up in my att mailbox, with no indications.
[+] [-] charrington|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dattaway|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jf|16 years ago|reply
http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm
Just be sure to reply to every piece of mail that you get from the FCC and AT&T on time.