top | item 7261740

(no title)

iamjustin | 12 years ago

Are you serious? You're comparing micro-transactions in Candy Crush to Versace/Starbucks/Cadillac. Do you honestly think that's a reasonable comparison?

discuss

order

baddox|12 years ago

There is a comparison. Both companies purposefully attempt to persuade people to pay money for their products. Like every other company that has ever existed.

TheZenPsycho|12 years ago

there's a difference though. In one, you get a useful product: a car. And a good feeling that goes with it.

What king does, and what is being called manipulation, does not result in satisfaction or good feeling. A person simply spends money in order to progress, but ultimately does not actually get an enjoyable experience or useful product out of spending the money. It's borderline gambling.

DigitalSea|12 years ago

Loyalty programs are very similar psychologically to what King and other game makers do in their games to get you to buy from them. Give someone a reason to spend money and they will and without realising it, you've spent more than it cost you to give away that free coffee are purchasing 5 coffees.

MarkPNeyer|12 years ago

starbucks relies on providing the user a quick fix of doamine when they feel stressed or unfocused, which keeps them coming back.

versace and cadillac rely on providing their customers a feeling of superiority and social status. cadillacs are arguably better engineered than other brands, but versace is clearly all about status.

i think it's a reasonable comparison, but as others have said, this is what most companies do anyhow.