I'm probably going to be hated on for this post, but Steve Jobs doesn't represent Arab Americans, because he was adopted and wasn't brought up in Arab culture, religion or language. He called his biological parents 'an egg and sperm'.
While this is probably obvious for most people, I don't think calling Steve Jobs "Arab" is really of service to anyone. If you want to rise the profile of Arab Americans or Arabs in general there are a lot of great people to choose from.
He is half Syrian. Syrians are not even Arabs. Neither are Lebanese or Egyptian, or Iranian (Persian) people. It just happened that at some point Arabs invaded their lands.
This is like calling Spanish people Arabs, because Arabs used to be there at some point, or calling English people French, because French used to be there at some point.
The ethnicity knowledge of the Americans is no better than their geographical knowledge.
As an Arab, I agree. He might be Arab by DNA, but definitely not by culture. We all know that DNA and genes mean nothing for success. Jobs succeeded as a result of his environment, and not where his DNA roots trace back to.
Many of the famous Jews are only Jews in the same way that Steve Jobs is Arab. E.g. Dylan, Einstein, Marx.. The point is that there is precedent in letting the minority itself decide which persons are members of it and which are not. We should extend the same courtesy to all minorities.
Bill Gates should be in a "great American humanitarians" series.
Why exactly should Steve Jobs be on a stamp?
This gives me an idea, Post Office should sell application fees for stamp ideas like license plates to fund their insane retirement plan requirements.
But then we might end up with confederate flag stamps like Georgia plates.
Of course you can print almost anything as your own stamps legally now. And in the end I think people spend a whole second if any time at all looking at a stamp.
Iconic figure of the late 20th/early 21st century IT revolution?
Led a company that was involved in multiple hugely-successful, era-defining products (the Apple II, the Mac, the iPod, the iPhone, the iPad) along with many industry leading products (the Macbook Air and iMac to name but two)?
Had a unique management style - I don't mean the unpleasantness, I mean the laser-sharp focus on a few product categories and on pushing smart people to deliver amazing things that even they didn't think they could deliver - a management style which everyone tries to emulate in some ways these days...?
Founded, built up, was kicked out of, came back into and rescued what became for a little while the most valuable company in the world by market cap?
Any of the above is reason enough for a postage stamp, of all things. All of them together seem to make it a no-brainer.
And yes, Bill Gates no doubt deserves a postage stamp too - but I'd argue it's for his relentless delivery of Microsoft's mission: a computer on every desk and in every home. They achieved it and they changed the world with that.
You know how difficult it is to remove "religion" (using it as a general term; so nationalism is a part of) from humans? Very difficult. It's part of our biology. Although thousands of years ago it was crucial for our survival, it is primitive behaviour right now and destroys us unfortunately.
The title appears to be link-bait in order to discuss the (so far unsuccessful) effort to get another American of Syrian decent (Khalil Gibran) on a postage stamp.
I've always found it ironic that the same people that claim race does not exist are the same people who encourage and support these types of race-based promotions and classifications (well, as long as they are non-white).
I find it ironic that the people who claim to be against racism actually seem to promote it with positive discrimination policies. Positive discrimination for one person is negative discrimination for the rest.
Truly non racist behaviour would not mention the race, and treat everyone as equal.
(I also find the attitude in the States kind of strange, as there is a lot more mention of racial background than in the UK. If someone "does well" in life and is from a racial minority, the background is pretty much always mentioned).
Speaking of European Americans... I never really got if the term "Latin" in the US applies to those of Latin European descent (Spanish, French, Romanian, etc.), olny to Latin Americans (Mexican, Brazilian, etc.) or if it means something completely different??
Is it just me who thinks this heritage bullshit needs to stop? Why are people just content knowing that someone of their (or certain) heritage is the one who made it big? My question has always been what have I or you done or contributed? Granted I am far off from doing anything substantial in life but please, let's be a little mature here.
nature and nurture... you can't dismiss either. one is your genetic wiring (hardware) and the other is your indelible early childhood experience (firmware) ... and then there's your re-programmable self (software) ... His bio father being from that part of the world means his dad's genetic make is probably shared with 14% of Semites (Jews and Arabs of that area), 75% of south east Turks and southern Greeks, and 10% of sub-Saharan Africans. This is by no means an informed analysis of his dad's genetic heritage. Just an educated guess.
I know two identical twins (well they have an unidentical triplet sister as well). Interestingly they have reasonably different personalities - the nice one and the arse (relatively speaking).
[+] [-] dimitar|12 years ago|reply
While this is probably obvious for most people, I don't think calling Steve Jobs "Arab" is really of service to anyone. If you want to rise the profile of Arab Americans or Arabs in general there are a lot of great people to choose from.
[+] [-] 0x0007|12 years ago|reply
This is like calling Spanish people Arabs, because Arabs used to be there at some point, or calling English people French, because French used to be there at some point.
The ethnicity knowledge of the Americans is no better than their geographical knowledge.
[+] [-] nayefc|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bjourne|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amasad|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ck2|12 years ago|reply
Why exactly should Steve Jobs be on a stamp?
This gives me an idea, Post Office should sell application fees for stamp ideas like license plates to fund their insane retirement plan requirements.
But then we might end up with confederate flag stamps like Georgia plates.
Of course you can print almost anything as your own stamps legally now. And in the end I think people spend a whole second if any time at all looking at a stamp.
[+] [-] swombat|12 years ago|reply
Iconic figure of the late 20th/early 21st century IT revolution?
Led a company that was involved in multiple hugely-successful, era-defining products (the Apple II, the Mac, the iPod, the iPhone, the iPad) along with many industry leading products (the Macbook Air and iMac to name but two)?
Had a unique management style - I don't mean the unpleasantness, I mean the laser-sharp focus on a few product categories and on pushing smart people to deliver amazing things that even they didn't think they could deliver - a management style which everyone tries to emulate in some ways these days...?
Founded, built up, was kicked out of, came back into and rescued what became for a little while the most valuable company in the world by market cap?
Any of the above is reason enough for a postage stamp, of all things. All of them together seem to make it a no-brainer.
And yes, Bill Gates no doubt deserves a postage stamp too - but I'd argue it's for his relentless delivery of Microsoft's mission: a computer on every desk and in every home. They achieved it and they changed the world with that.
[+] [-] artificialidiot|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] linux_devil|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nayefc|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dak1|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] babarock|12 years ago|reply
Actually, even calling him American is wrong. From the Wikipedia article:
> The young emigrant from Lebanon who came through Ellis Island in 1895 never became an American citizen; he loved his birthplace too much
[+] [-] powertower|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] collyw|12 years ago|reply
Truly non racist behaviour would not mention the race, and treat everyone as equal.
(I also find the attitude in the States kind of strange, as there is a lot more mention of racial background than in the UK. If someone "does well" in life and is from a racial minority, the background is pretty much always mentioned).
[+] [-] frade33|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] azth|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vixen99|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] theorique|12 years ago|reply
If someone's a first generation immigrant (whether from Europe, Africa, or elsewhere, then that's considered interesting).
For example, one of the most dynamic young African-American entrepreneurs, Elon Musk, immigrated to the US.
[+] [-] jakobsen|12 years ago|reply
Anyone can help me there?
[+] [-] alaaibrahim|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] geekam|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joelgrus|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nationcrafting|12 years ago|reply
-"You mean my face will be pasted in their signature?"
[+] [-] prht|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] toddan|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] marcfawzi|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] collyw|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] marcfawzi|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] prht|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] blumkvist|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] beedogs|12 years ago|reply