"The airplane is not ready to fly. It is necessary to make a technical service and prolongation of the data limit."
Guessing something got lost in translation. In any case. as aircraft maintenance isn't my area, any idea how viable/costly it is to get airworthy? Could you even get spare parts anymore?
Spare parts are probably attainable (there's a reason retired aircraft are mothballed rather than scrapped), and the major companies that the built the engines, etc, are still around.
Out of 500 or built ~60 are still in service. Getting parts as a civilian operator might be touchy though. It's probably being sold more as a museum piece.
In terms of doing a restoration Russian stuff is usually pretty viable since mechnically they're fairly straightfoward and rugged, and not much in the way of computers or microelectronics of any kind. Even with all that said, it would probably be a $10M+ (quite possibly +++) to get it airworthy again, and even if you did it would be very expensive. Fuel burn on those things is about 2000 gph, and Jet-A is currently ~$6/gal, so you're looking at $12k/hr just in fuel expenses. Maintenance will probably at least double that hourly figure.
I volunteered for an Air Force museum and even non-operational/replica parts were expensive and hard to find for aircraft. I would imagine getting this certified/flyable would cost nearly as much as the purchase price when the dust settles.
there is a reason why US and the others were rushing for Ukraine to give up its nuclear weapons 20 years ago :) See Lord of War too.
Interesting how recent developments continue to show the difference between how countries are treated when they have nuclear weapons vs. when they don't have, like North Korea vs. Iraq. Looking at Ukraine i wonder what Iran think :)
Did people raid the Poltava Museum of Long-Range Aviation? According to wikipedia it has the only Tu-95 in Ukraine (as well as a Tu-160, in case you want a supersonic strategic bomber)
a good rule of thumb for warbirds is that however much it costs you to buy it is about how much it will cost you per year afterwards to keep it flying.
That is a fine piece of hardware. what would restoration cost? How do you even restore it ? spare parts, technicians on the Tu-95MS are probably not in ample supply.
One main issue with owning aircraft like this is not the cost to get it ready to fly from its current state but maintaining it to fly. In the air-force you normally have large mechanic teams that are dedicated to the aircraft. As soon as it lands its taken to the hanger and the teams get to work on it. These are not your normal cessnas where you land, tie down, then come back a week later and throw gas in and go. As soon as these planes land, there is stuff that is broken or needs fixed/tuned each time. You will end up employing an entire team to keep this air worthy. This is the same issue you find with older migs for sale and why they are so cheap.
I would imagine that as far as expertise goes, a seasoned mechanic in that field could work nearly as well with this aircraft as any other, much the same way our own expertise in computer hardware might translate across varying brands and models, gotchas and idiosyncrasies aside.
when Tu-95 were flying out on patrol in Atlantic, the US underwater listening stations (for submarines) installed on the Greenland-Iceland-Norway line were registering the planes too.
454 hours of flight time seems low for a military plane built in the 80's. That is not very many flights from the Soviet Union to off the U.S. coastline.
Many Soviet vehicles and aircraft weren't of great build quality so they tended to have training vehicles that would be used by many crews until they fell apart, and vehicles reserved for combat.
This aircraft was built in '87, by which time the Soviet economy was in serious trouble and training was at reduced levels. The Bear always projected a scarier image than was reality.
[+] [-] Luc|12 years ago|reply
Looks like it has a few siblings, so what you're getting is not as exclusive as you might think...
That explains the pictures on the eBay auction appearing to be from different fuselages - they actually are (the two rightmost ones on Google Maps).
EDIT: Hmmm, maybe not. Perhaps it's the same plane in different locations, I can't be sure.
[+] [-] thearn4|12 years ago|reply
Not convinced that the auction is legit.
By the way, the American version (military aviation graveyard) of this is pretty fun to look around at too:
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.1572109,-110.8374108,4128m/d...
[+] [-] Evgeniuz|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joshmlewis|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] neurotech1|12 years ago|reply
It could be that only one is legally for sale.
[+] [-] dav-|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] drunkenfly|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] etjossem|12 years ago|reply
"Ships worldwide. Excludes: Africa, Central America and Caribbean, Oceania, Southeast Asia, South America, Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan Republic, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, Georgia, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Maldives, Mongolia, Nepal, Pakistan, Russian Federation, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Oman, Yemen, Bermuda, Mexico, Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Republic of, Cyprus, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Hungary, Latvia, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia."
[+] [-] Flammy|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kachnuv_ocasek|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] peeters|12 years ago|reply
But the seller has an excellent rating, so it's probably legit.
[+] [-] darklajid|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] United857|12 years ago|reply
Guessing something got lost in translation. In any case. as aircraft maintenance isn't my area, any idea how viable/costly it is to get airworthy? Could you even get spare parts anymore?
[+] [-] TylerE|12 years ago|reply
Out of 500 or built ~60 are still in service. Getting parts as a civilian operator might be touchy though. It's probably being sold more as a museum piece.
In terms of doing a restoration Russian stuff is usually pretty viable since mechnically they're fairly straightfoward and rugged, and not much in the way of computers or microelectronics of any kind. Even with all that said, it would probably be a $10M+ (quite possibly +++) to get it airworthy again, and even if you did it would be very expensive. Fuel burn on those things is about 2000 gph, and Jet-A is currently ~$6/gal, so you're looking at $12k/hr just in fuel expenses. Maintenance will probably at least double that hourly figure.
[+] [-] 650REDHAIR|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Aloha|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fiatmoney|12 years ago|reply
Seems legit.
[+] [-] jedmeyers|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nateberkopec|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jackhammons|12 years ago|reply
Hopefully the auction ends before it's repossessed by its "original owners" who are closing in fast....
[+] [-] trhway|12 years ago|reply
Interesting how recent developments continue to show the difference between how countries are treated when they have nuclear weapons vs. when they don't have, like North Korea vs. Iraq. Looking at Ukraine i wonder what Iran think :)
[+] [-] staunch|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] the_af|12 years ago|reply
- Price tag of US $3,000,000.
Well, I'm convinced. Here is my credit card!
[+] [-] jdbevan|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] masklinn|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] trhway|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vl|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] izzydata|12 years ago|reply
Seemed funny to me.
[+] [-] imadethis|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bovermyer|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Evgeniuz|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] erobbins|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] allochthon|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 3327|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ChrisBland|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Zikes|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fredgrott|12 years ago|reply
MS stands for Maritime Strike
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Bear.html
[+] [-] unknown|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] trhway|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nickmccann|12 years ago|reply
Anyone know why there is a 5000 hour limit?
[+] [-] ars|12 years ago|reply
It's more a certain number of takeoff and landings rather than flight time. After that the metal is too weak and unsafe.
Each time the cabin pressure changes the skin moves. Each time it takes off or lands the wings flex. They probably flex during flight as well.
First link I found: http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/04/aircraft_fati...
[+] [-] chiph|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hristov|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] edwhitesell|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sswaner|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Perdition|12 years ago|reply
This aircraft was built in '87, by which time the Soviet economy was in serious trouble and training was at reduced levels. The Bear always projected a scarier image than was reality.
[+] [-] fredgrott|12 years ago|reply