top | item 7356713 (no title) nickmccann | 12 years ago "The plane was manufactured in 1987 and has been flown 454 hours and 24 Minutes of the estimated 5000 hours it is capable off."Anyone know why there is a 5000 hour limit? discuss order hn newest ars|12 years ago The aluminum skin and wings fatigue.It's more a certain number of takeoff and landings rather than flight time. After that the metal is too weak and unsafe.Each time the cabin pressure changes the skin moves. Each time it takes off or lands the wings flex. They probably flex during flight as well.First link I found: http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/04/aircraft_fati... coin|12 years ago That still doesn't explain the low total time limit. 5000 hours is low compared to the typical 50000+ hours that modern jets are rated for. load replies (1) chiph|12 years ago The maintenance service costs at that number of flight hours probably exceeds it's economic value. ballard|12 years ago Yup. It's purely badass value. hristov|12 years ago They are probably referring to the engines. Engines are rated in hours. edwhitesell|12 years ago Probably before the next round of maintenance.
ars|12 years ago The aluminum skin and wings fatigue.It's more a certain number of takeoff and landings rather than flight time. After that the metal is too weak and unsafe.Each time the cabin pressure changes the skin moves. Each time it takes off or lands the wings flex. They probably flex during flight as well.First link I found: http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/04/aircraft_fati... coin|12 years ago That still doesn't explain the low total time limit. 5000 hours is low compared to the typical 50000+ hours that modern jets are rated for. load replies (1)
coin|12 years ago That still doesn't explain the low total time limit. 5000 hours is low compared to the typical 50000+ hours that modern jets are rated for. load replies (1)
chiph|12 years ago The maintenance service costs at that number of flight hours probably exceeds it's economic value. ballard|12 years ago Yup. It's purely badass value.
ars|12 years ago
It's more a certain number of takeoff and landings rather than flight time. After that the metal is too weak and unsafe.
Each time the cabin pressure changes the skin moves. Each time it takes off or lands the wings flex. They probably flex during flight as well.
First link I found: http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/04/aircraft_fati...
coin|12 years ago
chiph|12 years ago
ballard|12 years ago
hristov|12 years ago
edwhitesell|12 years ago