top | item 7408579

(no title)

stoptalkingshit | 12 years ago

And yet, she initiated that chain of events. You should think more carefully about what the word "power" means.

discuss

order

unreal37|12 years ago

Apparently her exit from Github was to be a secret, but an anonymous person publicly posted about it to a social network with a nasty comment. So somebody inside Github leaked it. To the mattresses!

enneff|12 years ago

Are you aware of how patronising this response is? If you want to make a comment about the nature of power, make it. Don't tell me to think more carefully.

I'm not sure precisely which event you're saying she initiated, but if you're talking about her quitting her job and then speaking out like this: you should think about why someone would put their reputation and livelihood on the line.

pgeorgi|12 years ago

"If you are one of the people in this thread jumping to defend GitHub in this situation, ask yourself why."

"If you want to make a comment about [...], make it. Don't tell me to think more carefully."

Pot, meet kettle.

stoptalkingshit|12 years ago

The nature of power is that the person who sets the ball rolling is the one in power. That's why a sculptor is the one with the power, not the chisel. The fact that there's some appearance of backlash doesn't alter that. And as to which chain of events, how could I be any clearer? The chain of events starting with her deciding to go public. The rest of your comment is just shallow moralizing that doesn't tell us anything about who has the power. I suppose you're the one to always side with the crying woman, because that's as deep as your understanding of power goes. It doesn't occur to you that tears themselves have power.