top | item 7423365 What Clinkle Is and Isn’t Building 10 points| dannyaway | 12 years ago |recode.net | reply 6 comments order hn newest [+] [-] fearless|12 years ago|reply One can't help but question the wisdom of hiring multiple sales people to sell merchants on accepting a method of payment that has no users. [+] [-] matt__rose|12 years ago|reply $30mil in VC money and nothing to show for it, but we're not in a bubble... [+] [-] minimaxir|12 years ago|reply This is the most sardonic article about a startup I've ever read. [+] [-] michaelochurch|12 years ago|reply All you need to know about Clinkle is here: http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/t_ku-xlarge... [+] [-] sscalia|12 years ago|reply Nothing new in this article at all.Remove the CEO. Start over. No one at 22 can lead; especially not one coddled by the Stanford/quasi-ivy/ivy-league system. [+] [-] michaelochurch|12 years ago|reply Remove the CEO.Yes.Start over.Scrap it, especially the shitty name that is now a liability.No one at 22 can leadFalse. It's extremely rare to have leadership skills at 22, but not impossible. Joan of Arc died at 19.especially not one coddled by the Stanford/quasi-ivy/ivy-league system.It's not about Stanford. It's about the lack of grit and pain. It's also about a broken selection process that happens after college: the VC chickenhawk culture. For more, go here: http://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/vc-istan-6-th... .There are 22-year-olds who can start great companies, but they aren't likely to be found by chickenhawking VCs taking on midlife crisis proteges.
[+] [-] fearless|12 years ago|reply One can't help but question the wisdom of hiring multiple sales people to sell merchants on accepting a method of payment that has no users.
[+] [-] matt__rose|12 years ago|reply $30mil in VC money and nothing to show for it, but we're not in a bubble...
[+] [-] minimaxir|12 years ago|reply This is the most sardonic article about a startup I've ever read.
[+] [-] michaelochurch|12 years ago|reply All you need to know about Clinkle is here: http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/t_ku-xlarge...
[+] [-] sscalia|12 years ago|reply Nothing new in this article at all.Remove the CEO. Start over. No one at 22 can lead; especially not one coddled by the Stanford/quasi-ivy/ivy-league system. [+] [-] michaelochurch|12 years ago|reply Remove the CEO.Yes.Start over.Scrap it, especially the shitty name that is now a liability.No one at 22 can leadFalse. It's extremely rare to have leadership skills at 22, but not impossible. Joan of Arc died at 19.especially not one coddled by the Stanford/quasi-ivy/ivy-league system.It's not about Stanford. It's about the lack of grit and pain. It's also about a broken selection process that happens after college: the VC chickenhawk culture. For more, go here: http://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/vc-istan-6-th... .There are 22-year-olds who can start great companies, but they aren't likely to be found by chickenhawking VCs taking on midlife crisis proteges.
[+] [-] michaelochurch|12 years ago|reply Remove the CEO.Yes.Start over.Scrap it, especially the shitty name that is now a liability.No one at 22 can leadFalse. It's extremely rare to have leadership skills at 22, but not impossible. Joan of Arc died at 19.especially not one coddled by the Stanford/quasi-ivy/ivy-league system.It's not about Stanford. It's about the lack of grit and pain. It's also about a broken selection process that happens after college: the VC chickenhawk culture. For more, go here: http://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/vc-istan-6-th... .There are 22-year-olds who can start great companies, but they aren't likely to be found by chickenhawking VCs taking on midlife crisis proteges.
[+] [-] fearless|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] matt__rose|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] minimaxir|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] michaelochurch|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sscalia|12 years ago|reply
Remove the CEO. Start over. No one at 22 can lead; especially not one coddled by the Stanford/quasi-ivy/ivy-league system.
[+] [-] michaelochurch|12 years ago|reply
Yes.
Start over.
Scrap it, especially the shitty name that is now a liability.
No one at 22 can lead
False. It's extremely rare to have leadership skills at 22, but not impossible. Joan of Arc died at 19.
especially not one coddled by the Stanford/quasi-ivy/ivy-league system.
It's not about Stanford. It's about the lack of grit and pain. It's also about a broken selection process that happens after college: the VC chickenhawk culture. For more, go here: http://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/vc-istan-6-th... .
There are 22-year-olds who can start great companies, but they aren't likely to be found by chickenhawking VCs taking on midlife crisis proteges.