top | item 74854 (no title) DeathCrab | 18 years ago "Seriously"? It says "joke" at the top of the page. discuss order hn newest jetpack|18 years ago And today is Halloween, not April Fool's. Gotta wait for the right moment with these things. benhoyt|18 years ago I haven't run the .exe, but the source code looks pretty non-jokish to me. DeathCrab|18 years ago Like the guy says, just because it works doesn't mean it's not a joke.More telling, there's absolutely no data on reliability presented. If it was meant to seriously be used, that would be the first thing you'd want. nikolaj|18 years ago who says jokes can't be fully functional.. imo it makes them all that much better.. remember textquake? :)
jetpack|18 years ago And today is Halloween, not April Fool's. Gotta wait for the right moment with these things.
benhoyt|18 years ago I haven't run the .exe, but the source code looks pretty non-jokish to me. DeathCrab|18 years ago Like the guy says, just because it works doesn't mean it's not a joke.More telling, there's absolutely no data on reliability presented. If it was meant to seriously be used, that would be the first thing you'd want. nikolaj|18 years ago who says jokes can't be fully functional.. imo it makes them all that much better.. remember textquake? :)
DeathCrab|18 years ago Like the guy says, just because it works doesn't mean it's not a joke.More telling, there's absolutely no data on reliability presented. If it was meant to seriously be used, that would be the first thing you'd want.
nikolaj|18 years ago who says jokes can't be fully functional.. imo it makes them all that much better.. remember textquake? :)
jetpack|18 years ago
benhoyt|18 years ago
DeathCrab|18 years ago
More telling, there's absolutely no data on reliability presented. If it was meant to seriously be used, that would be the first thing you'd want.
nikolaj|18 years ago