(no title)
pjan | 12 years ago
I share my time over Singapore and Japan, and no one ever touches your stuff in both places; not during a bathroom break, not even during a lunch break when people leave their shiny macbooks to keep their seats warm.
This immediately invalidates all the other comments saying that uniformity of behaviour/lack of entrepreneurship is a consequence of this in Japan, since it also works in Singapore where (perceived) entrepreneurship is much higher.
Theft is a problem. It doesn't bring about good things, nor does the lack of it bring about bad things.
Quite the opposite!
revelation|12 years ago
w1ntermute|12 years ago
No, it doesn't. In Japan, that safety is a product of a culture of uniformity, which invariably results in a lack of entrepreneurship/innovation.
In Singapore, that "safety" is the product of an authoritarian government that severely curtails civil liberties and human rights. Free speech and political freedoms are restricted, chewing gum is banned for non-medical purposes, and the punishment for possessing 500+ grams of pot is a mandatory death sentence. Archaic and barbaric punishments such as caning continue to be practiced. Such an oppressive government is not something we want in the West, regardless of the "benefits."
As Benjamin Franklin said:
> They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
greggman|12 years ago
I guess all those famous Japanese brands just some how happened without any entrepreneurship and their products happened without any innovation.
Sorry, I didn't mean for this to be snarky but seriously... Your excuses are BS and don't live up to any scrutiny. It's not an either/or thing.
vajrabum|12 years ago
unknown|12 years ago
[deleted]