top | item 7541527

(no title)

aspensmonster | 12 years ago

I'd say Google has its own share of responsibility for the lack of adoption of APNGs. Chromium doesn't support them out of the box.

discuss

order

TazeTSchnitzel|12 years ago

I suppose because that requires using libapng instead of libpng, maybe?

maxst|12 years ago

APNG support can be implemented on top of regular libpng. I have the working code.

valarauca1|12 years ago

You really shouldn't blame google, but blame KHTML (who's code base was forked to develop Webkit, and then Blink). KHTML didn't move to support apng until 2010-2011 which was a few years after the webkit fork.

andyroid|12 years ago

So to get this straight, we should blame the KHTML devs for adding a feature after Google forked it's code? While not blaming Google for never adding the feature?

mpyne|12 years ago

uh hwat?

APNG was still years away when Webkit was forked from KHTML. Webkit was so long ago that Firefox didn't exist, nor did "Mozilla Firebird", and IIRC nor did Phoenix.