Counterfeiting of chips is such a big problem that the US DARPA has a major program to develop tiny cryptographic chips that can be embedded inside chip packages to prove their authenticity. It's called the SHIELD program (solicitation number DARPA-BAA-14-16 if you want to ask for money).
I'm not an EE, but I imagine that a much better solution would be a universal device where you can connect a chip and run a publicly available test suite against the chip to confirm that is performs as expected.
Like @wyager, I'm extremely skeptical of a program like SHIELD.
The trimmed resistors are the four brown rectangles with notches (one is shown in atomlib's pic).
The silvery surfaces are aluminum - seems a single layer of metal process. Some large plates may be capacitors.
In analog circuits, MOS transistors are often fairly big, to carry larger currents, sometimes in the tens or hundreds of milliamps. There are a few such large devices, where you can see an interdigitated structure: think two hands open flat with the fingers interpenetrating but not touching. One hand is the MOS source terminal, the other is the drain terminal, the space between is the gate that controls current flow in the channel between the two first terminals.
Here is image Mikhail Svarichevsky (author of that blog post) posted as answer to this question in comments on Habrahabr http://i.imgur.com/vC5VkH0.jpg
The interesting thing here is that the part has been substituted with another part that's comparable in quality and only slightly less expensive. The margins for counterfeiting this part can't have been very good.
It's pretty common to counterfeit electronic parts. I've come across counterfeit op-amps, exotic transistors, power transistors, ordinary transistors, capacitors, and even fake resistors which is amazing. It always just makes me wonder what is wrong, collectively and institutionally, with China? Making counterfeit goods of all kinds is apparently a common line of business in China. Is it just because _everything_ is made there so counterfeiting has proportionately shifted there as well?
In addition to what has already been stated, components have additional concerns about environmental tolerance and long-term reliability. If two chips test the same on a test bench, that just means there is no difference at this point in time and under the conditions of the test bench. It says nothing about vibration susceptibility, moisture susceptibility, EMI susceptibility, ESD sensitivity, operational and non-operational temperature ranges, or a host of other factors that affect reliability and manufacturability.
According to the blog post fake opamp has higher noise levels and higher offset voltage. But I would love to see it tested on audiophiles, I'm sure they can't hear the difference.
Small parts in complex systems may make drastic outcomes (e.g. Heartbleed bug). In many cases there are so many small components that perceiving such a "difference" is a non-trivial task. Thus, not being able to identify from whence the difference sprang in the context of a complete circuit does not entail a lack of any difference. tl:dr: Difference is difference: a tautology; or rather: no difference != difference
They also may use lasers to trim and tune the mostly-crystal oscillators used in timing circuits, such as the small quartz "tuning fork" found in many digital watches.
Decent optical microscope is more than adequate for photos like that; electron microscope is for gate-level.
Zac Brown and Adam Laurie are doing awesome stuff (with cheap equipment, relatively) in chip teardowns; basically the stuff Chris Tarnovsky (flylogic, now ioactive) does with $5mm stuff, they do 90% with $5-10k.
[+] [-] leephillips|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] AJ007|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] malandrew|12 years ago|reply
Like @wyager, I'm extremely skeptical of a program like SHIELD.
[+] [-] unknown|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] wyager|12 years ago|reply
Seems legit.
http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/vinge/hotchips/security.ht...
[+] [-] logicallee|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hammock|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] natejenkins|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ableal|12 years ago|reply
The silvery surfaces are aluminum - seems a single layer of metal process. Some large plates may be capacitors.
In analog circuits, MOS transistors are often fairly big, to carry larger currents, sometimes in the tens or hundreds of milliamps. There are a few such large devices, where you can see an interdigitated structure: think two hands open flat with the fingers interpenetrating but not touching. One hand is the MOS source terminal, the other is the drain terminal, the space between is the gate that controls current flow in the channel between the two first terminals.
(Layout diagram picture: http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~butts/icons/ex2.gif - blue is metal drain and source, red is poly gate, green squares are contacts to silicon below.)
[+] [-] cc_|12 years ago|reply
http://security.cs.rpi.edu/courses/hwre-spring2014/
The slides for lecture 4 (http://security.cs.rpi.edu/courses/hwre-spring2014/Lecture4_...) shows what various types of components (such as laser-trimmed resistors) look like on a die.
[+] [-] atomlib|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] morcheeba|12 years ago|reply
You can see the laser has cut the resistive material, increasing the resistance.
[+] [-] joosters|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thrownaway2424|12 years ago|reply
It's pretty common to counterfeit electronic parts. I've come across counterfeit op-amps, exotic transistors, power transistors, ordinary transistors, capacitors, and even fake resistors which is amazing. It always just makes me wonder what is wrong, collectively and institutionally, with China? Making counterfeit goods of all kinds is apparently a common line of business in China. Is it just because _everything_ is made there so counterfeiting has proportionately shifted there as well?
[+] [-] vonmoltke|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] icegreentea|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] atomlib|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gcommer|12 years ago|reply
> On the other hand AD744 has higher noise (3x) and higher offset voltage (0.5mV vs 0.1mV).
[+] [-] josh-wrale|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fnordfnordfnord|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] boise|12 years ago|reply
http://octopart.com/opa627au-texas+instruments-420817
[+] [-] GFK_of_xmaspast|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] njharman|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Terr_|12 years ago|reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Inside_QuartzCrystal-Tunin...
[+] [-] Johan-bjareholt|12 years ago|reply
Will buy the genuine one for comparison, will see if I can hear any sound quality difference
[+] [-] darksim905|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ableal|12 years ago|reply
Besides, electron microscope pictures are monochromatic.
[+] [-] BarsMonster|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rdl|12 years ago|reply
Zac Brown and Adam Laurie are doing awesome stuff (with cheap equipment, relatively) in chip teardowns; basically the stuff Chris Tarnovsky (flylogic, now ioactive) does with $5mm stuff, they do 90% with $5-10k.
[+] [-] Johan-bjareholt|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]