I wish instead they would get their Android-Kindle products certified by Google, so we could get the Google Play Store Apps on them, and that they would put Amazon Instant Watch and Music Store as Google Play Store Apps, so I could rent movies on my Android devices.
But I'm not one of those marketing geniuses who loves to create walled gardens and captured verticals and synergized markets and all that...
It seems to me that the goal of selling smartphones is no longer to profit from the sale of hardware, but to put your own services and content stores in front of the user. We've been seeing this in the PC industry for a couple decades now, with moderate push back from Microsoft.
The Google Play Store is a nightmare for smaller developers. Unlike every other app platform I can think of (including Amazon's) which just send you nice tidy royalty payments, Google expects you to handle the sales tax for each and every customer, everywhere in the world.
And yet virtually nobody talks about this. I'm quite certain that any developer without an accountant is either getting it wrong or ignoring it completely. This is the reason that if I release a game for Android, it will only be through Amazon.
I'd really love for Amazon to make a phone that uses the same eink screen as the kindle paperwhite. Just a basic, no frills phone with a similar long lasting battery life to the paperwhite.
No doubt if they are planning a smart phone though it'll be more similar to their Kindle Fire tablets which is fair enough, but hey I can dream..
Yes! Battery life is a killer feature for me. I'd be willing to sacrifice a lot of functionality for something that was as hardy and needed as little recharging as my kindle.
Would they sell it at or close cost like most Amazon hardware? I don't see a lot of the customer using "amazon content (movies and music, which amazon is trying to bet heavy on)" on their tiered data plans.
Or sell above cost and join the market of, oh so many, other handsets?
You can still access Amazon content on WiFi, and they could play some games with caching. Flash is sold at a premium (wasn't the iPhone like, $100 to go from 8GB to 16GB?) but not actually all that expensive.
Google Music is a perfect example, actually. I allow it to stream music over 3G, but it still aggressively manages a local cache of music anywhere from 1-2GB, leveraging WiFi to save data. (It would use more if I didn't have a dinky 8GB device)
Their culture is different from Apple. They didn't get a perfect product first time. But their revisions have been awesome and the beat Apple on price. Combined with Amazon prime, it does offer some advantages on content.
Amazon is great for content, but not having the Google apps like gmail, maps, and so on is kind of a dealbreaker. Also, with a Nexus phone, Google keeps creating updates for it. I don't get the impression Amazon is so concerned with keeping things updated like that.
My Kindle Fire gets regular system updates. The latest was a few days ago. I don't know what the updates involve aside from updates like Goodreads integration, but I do know it's not getting worse. It was already nearly perfect the day I got it. The only update I'd want is Google Play, and that's not a deal breaker since I can sideload the important stuff.
Agree about not having a full app ecosystem like Google apps, however, Amazon keeps their hardware up to date. I've had a couple Kindles of different vintage and they continue to have firmware updates for them.
This is why HTML5 will win in the end. In a few years all your apps will be web-views again. Proprietary, walled-garden standards don't scale horizontally across platforms.
When you refer the the "large install base" associated with Canonical, I assume you mean Ubuntu on servers. Lots of people do run Ubuntu on AWS, but Amazon never needed to own Canonical to make that possible.
The Kindle Fire OS is a fork of the Android Open Source Project, not Ubuntu or Ubuntu Touch.
I'm wondering how come no one is talking about the elephant in the room. Google Services! No one really cares about Android's "open"-ness anyone, because without Goog services a smartphone is virtually nothing -- you need maps, youtube and gmail at the very least. AMZN has a plan for that?
>They said the phone would employ retina-tracking technology embedded in four front-facing cameras, or sensors, to make some images appear to be 3-D, similar to a hologram, the people said.
Google.com's search engine gives you "information" and tries to sell stuff. Amazon.com's search engine finds you products when you're trying to buy stuff.
[+] [-] VikingCoder|12 years ago|reply
But I'm not one of those marketing geniuses who loves to create walled gardens and captured verticals and synergized markets and all that...
[+] [-] Zak|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TillE|12 years ago|reply
And yet virtually nobody talks about this. I'm quite certain that any developer without an accountant is either getting it wrong or ignoring it completely. This is the reason that if I release a game for Android, it will only be through Amazon.
[+] [-] philo23|12 years ago|reply
No doubt if they are planning a smart phone though it'll be more similar to their Kindle Fire tablets which is fair enough, but hey I can dream..
[+] [-] vvvnnnnvvv|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] damon_c|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] myth_drannon|12 years ago|reply
http://yotaphone.com/
[+] [-] alttab|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thinkagain22|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] VikingCoder|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] iscrewyou|12 years ago|reply
Would they sell it at or close cost like most Amazon hardware? I don't see a lot of the customer using "amazon content (movies and music, which amazon is trying to bet heavy on)" on their tiered data plans.
Or sell above cost and join the market of, oh so many, other handsets?
[+] [-] sliverstorm|12 years ago|reply
Google Music is a perfect example, actually. I allow it to stream music over 3G, but it still aggressively manages a local cache of music anywhere from 1-2GB, leveraging WiFi to save data. (It would use more if I didn't have a dinky 8GB device)
[+] [-] pat2man|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kbd|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mkr-hn|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] enscr|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jquery|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] davidw|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mkr-hn|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] taude|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dclowd9901|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jquery|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] transfire|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] troymc|12 years ago|reply
The Kindle Fire OS is a fork of the Android Open Source Project, not Ubuntu or Ubuntu Touch.
[+] [-] tgeek|12 years ago|reply
Since its the default OS for Linux on AWS, it probably has a pretty large install base. More than most would probably assume.
[+] [-] sliverstorm|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dalek2point3|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rory096|12 years ago|reply
Reminds me of the zSpace. (https://zspace.com) Pretty neat stuff.
[+] [-] danford|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mkr-hn|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rajacombinator|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] alttab|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] p-pat-ni|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]