top | item 7670143

Hacker taps into baby monitor, shouts at sleeping infant

57 points| timr | 12 years ago |blog.sfgate.com | reply

56 comments

order
[+] ipsin|12 years ago|reply
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/01/bug-exposes-ip-cameras-ba...

"The issue came to light on the company’s support forum after camera experts discovered that the Web interface for many Foscam cameras can be accessed simply by pressing “OK” in the dialog box when prompted for a username and password."

I understand that using this security hole to yell at a baby makes you a terrible person, but I'm also appalled at the company that made that situation possible for so many of its customers.

[+] primitivesuave|12 years ago|reply
It takes a reasonably intelligent programmer to identify a security hole, and an entire team of foolish programmers to let one through. It's quite evident that this company only has the latter.
[+] ultimoo|12 years ago|reply
An internet routable camera in the house with a voice channel is the exact kind of thing that should have a two-plus factor authentication, strong tls capabilities, responds only to pre-approved IP address ranges, and any other paranoid security practice that you can come up with.

In fact any tin foil class practice in these situations is worthwhile.

[+] cbhl|12 years ago|reply
On the other hand, new parents are probably really stressed out (being awoken in the middle of the night, etc.) so I wonder whether parents would be willing to put up with two-factor auth on such a camera.
[+] jonny_eh|12 years ago|reply
pre-approved IP ranges? Makes it kinda hard to access over 3G then.

Easier would be to make it only available on the LAN and then access it via a VPN. But even that would be too complex for 99% of the population.

[+] elwell|12 years ago|reply
> a hacker accessed a Houston couple’s device and called their 2-year-old a slut

Sorry, this is just hilarious; partly because the journalist doesn't put the degradation in quotes.

[+] subdane|12 years ago|reply
"scare" quotes. Literally.
[+] strozykowski|12 years ago|reply
> Heather picked up her mobile phone and accessed the camera to check on her 10-month-old daughter Emma’s room.

She didn't just walk into her baby's room after hearing a man's voice?

[+] emiliobumachar|12 years ago|reply
Checking the camera is a reflex you develop after the third time you get up and go to the baby's room seconds after hearing them cry, to find them sleeping.
[+] snowwrestler|12 years ago|reply
What if there actually was a man in there? Better to know that in advance.
[+] emocakes|12 years ago|reply
maybe her favourite TV show was on
[+] erobbins|12 years ago|reply
Does thinking this is hilarious make me a bad person?
[+] krick|12 years ago|reply
I'm surprised to see such comments here, because I guess the majority of HN would say "definitely yes", but, honestly, I couldn't help laughing while reading that.
[+] bertil|12 years ago|reply
A little bit.

In all reason, a child that age has very little memory, and loud noise are not exactly rare in his environment, so… it is a little funny. I think reading in Feynman lectures would be funnier, but then again, I’m not comedian.

[+] NAFV_P|12 years ago|reply
I can see the humourous side of it, but mostly I found it very frightening.

I have trouble picking which is more frightening, a flesh and blood intruder or a disembodied voice spying on you.

[+] devindotcom|12 years ago|reply
This isn't even the first time this has happened, if I remember correctly. There are thousands of unsecured devices out there that no one will ever secure, because they were never registered, just plug and play devices bought at Target for $20. It's an insoluble problem unless someone writes an invasive fix-it worm or something.
[+] Torgo|12 years ago|reply
As far as I'm concerned, Foscam cameras (the type in the story) are not securable. The firmware is complete trash. I have one and it is loaded with bugs. At least twice now I've gotten an urgent email telling me to update my firmware because of an exploit. I blocked mine on my router from accessing the Internet.

To give you notifications, it wants you to put in your email password, instant messenger password, ftp password, basically almost a dozen things. that could destroy your life if hacked. And this buggy, remotely exploitable camera wants you to trust it with all of them.

[+] librethrowaway|12 years ago|reply
There are threads every week on /b/ where people look for unsecured webcams and do stuff like this, often with 50 other people logged on to watch.

I'd wager that's who is behind this incident.

[+] throwaway-9684|12 years ago|reply
It's most likely that the "hacker" in news is from /g/. Every so often he has been posting videos on YouTube where he's yelling at people with unsecured IP cams. https://rbt.asia/g/thread/S41535725
[+] ars|12 years ago|reply
It's one thing to yell at an adult, it takes a different kind of nasty creature to yell at a baby.
[+] 3rd3|12 years ago|reply
It’s funny that "Schreck" is German for fear/fright/shock.
[+] smoyer|12 years ago|reply
"Heather picked up her mobile phone and accessed the camera to check on her 10-month-old daughter Emma’s room."

There's a man's voice coming from my 10 month-old daughter's room ... should I check my phone or get out of bed and RUN over to make sure she's not being kidnapped, molested, etc? This mother's reaction makes me think she'll be texting her (soon to be) teen-age daughter at the dinner table instead of making conversation.

[+] senorprogrammer|12 years ago|reply
As an owner of one of these cameras I remember being appalled at how difficult it was to actually secure, how many settings needed to be changed, and how bad the defaults were. Foscam cameras are practically shipped open and insecure by default, and it's not a stretch to say that you need to be a security-minded technophile to figure out how to lock them down properly.

They make commercial routes look positively impregnable by comparison.

[+] Mz|12 years ago|reply
Well, while, obviously, this is atrocious behavior on the part of the hacker, I can't quite relate. I hovered over my kids and I can't imagine sticking my infant so far away from myself that a baby monitor would be necessary. I never used one. I think that's generally not a good use for modern tech. I think it's the kind of thing that falls under "what's wrong with the world today."
[+] jrvarela56|12 years ago|reply
It's both amazing and scary that this kind of vulnerability is fairly common. Check out this great talk given at Defcon (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cWck_xcH64) to get an idea of the magnitude. These are systems that do not require any kind of tampering or credentials. Most times credentials are given to you in a prompt!
[+] facepalm|12 years ago|reply
The baby monitor we used, while without camera, wasn't even digital/internet based nor encrypted. Once we heard a kid call for "mama" before our baby could even speak. Wonder how many people listened in on us.
[+] anaphor|12 years ago|reply
With the rise of things like shodan this will probably become a lot more common until people either stop caring to exploit them or the vendors fix it.
[+] finnh|12 years ago|reply
why does the listening end of the monitor have a speaker? My (non-video, non-IP) baby monitors are strictly one-way.
[+] senorprogrammer|12 years ago|reply
These cameras aren't baby monitors per se, they're designed for surveilling a space. They have both a microphone for listening and a speaker for... shouting at ne'er-do-wells stealing your stuff, presumably.
[+] redeemedfadi|12 years ago|reply
It's probably even easier to view the feed from my 2.4GHz baby monitor, but at least you have to be in range...!
[+] microcolonel|12 years ago|reply
Slightly off-topic: isn't it a bit weird for them to air two stories criticizing IP cameras in a row?
[+] cpayne|12 years ago|reply
"Shouts at sleeping infant"

I hate that kind of sensationalist, link baiting journalism.

[+] emiliobumachar|12 years ago|reply
Both the title and the article seemed pretty objective to me. In this case, the facts are truly sensational. What looks linkbaity to you?
[+] IvyMike|12 years ago|reply
> sensationalist

"the use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement"

The "at the expense of accuracy" part doesn't seem to apply here-- the hacker did in fact scream at a sleeping infant.

[+] niix|12 years ago|reply
Wake up baby! Wake up baby!