On top of what wmf said, with whatever government investment has or has not already been made, the U.S. has the fourth highest* IPv6 adoption by percentage of requests as of Dec 2013 [1]. That is double what it was just six months prior [id].
Moreover, I doubt the US has as pressing a need to stave of address space exhaustion as do developing countries like China with rapidly expanding internet uptake.
*biased by Akamai's usage rates from country to country, of course
The MAC address is used if you autoconfigure IPv6, it's not required. Also you can enable privacy by requesting your host to generate a random host identifier.
[+] [-] mahyarm|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Taniwha|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dfc|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kiallmacinnes|12 years ago|reply
No matter what security benefits a NAT may or may not provide, a NAT is anything BUT a firewall. Stop calling NAT a firewall!
[+] [-] Niten|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DiabloD3|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] briandh|12 years ago|reply
Moreover, I doubt the US has as pressing a need to stave of address space exhaustion as do developing countries like China with rapidly expanding internet uptake.
*biased by Akamai's usage rates from country to country, of course
[1] http://www.networkcomputing.com/networking/ipv6-adoption-her...?
[+] [-] wmf|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] justincormack|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LiweiZ|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LiweiZ|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] notproductive|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nutjob2|12 years ago|reply
The MAC address is used if you autoconfigure IPv6, it's not required. Also you can enable privacy by requesting your host to generate a random host identifier.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#Privacy
[+] [-] DiabloD3|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikeash|12 years ago|reply