Having written quite a bit of text using both word processors and just plain text editors, I can see the value of this.
When your creatively writing or drawing its critical that your tools stay out of the way. Good writing and drawing programs do this, poor ones bog you down in administrivia, formatting, correcting, and the like.
This does mean things like having control, and many word processors these days dont allow the control needed. I also see this trend in many programs these days where the program seems to think that it has a better idea of how you want something done than you. When you get into a fight with one of these programs it can really burn up the idea you had in your head and then your stuck trying to find it again.
So, yeah, artists and writers sometimes use older things because they are better in that way.
And my colleagues wonder why I use emacs. I like IDEs, I use VS for work a fair amount. But when I just want to dig into the act of writing a program or text, I like editors that just stay out of the way.
Cormac McCarthy writes everything on a typewriter that cost him $50 in 1964 [1]. The novel, A Confederacy of Dunces was written by hand [2]. So I guess this means that when it comes to writing, especially writing fiction, the man and his mind are what matters.
Pen or pencil, it forces you to slow down and consider each word. If you read "On Writing Well" there's a lot of emphasis on not falling into boring patterns. It's like taking the longer, scenic route vs. the turnpike. The reader is right there with you for the journey. Some of us relish life at a slower pace.
That's funny. I held onto my DOS 286 laptop for many, many years so I could write on a single-function device with no access to modern software.
I used Norton Commander editor or vim to write documents and found it easier to be creative with a text editor instead of a word processor. If editing what I wrote on the first draft forces me to rearrange line endings, I find that I tend to edit my words less often while creativity is flowing.
Sometimes when coding I find it useful to make a conscious choice to go back to "inferior" technology.
For example, if I'm undertaking a huge refactor which will require a lot of reworking of tests, I'll usually drop down to Emacs (or keep using an IDE, but turn auto-compilation off) just to avoid the extreme amount of mental noise coming from all those compilation errors just sitting there and increasing over time. Sometimes it's better to just willfully ignore all that irrelevant detail for an hour or two, get into the flow and power through while you have the inspiration. Those test errors (compilation or otherwise) can always be fixed later.
I was looking for a joke along the lines of "that's why the world he depicts is so cruel, and that's why he kills characters so often", haven't found it, and by this comment am adding it.
On a serious note, whatever tool does not distract you while writing fiction is best. Usually you don't need an IDE for that.
OTOH a saga of that size might benefit from cross-referencing, timeline, etc IDE-like tools. Stephen King is known to employ a special person who checks his works for consistency with previous works in the same universe.
I enjoy my kobo. The single purpose (novels only, constant airplane mode) aspect is a big part of it. E-ink and 3 week battery life helps make it feel like a non device. It doesnt trigger my 10 second attention span mode.
It might be nice to have a nice light clamshell e-ink writing machine. All it does is write novels.
Anything that helps. For ggrm, I propose we take away any computer that runs any software other than wordstar. Get winds of wi ter written already! I need to know what happens. :)
He got off the exit right before the highway ran into Clippy-ville. Good for him. Also of a similar ilk is Neal Stephenson, who writes his stuff in Emacs (in LaTeX, I believe). There is something to be said for cranking out raw text without worrying about fighting the beast over spelling, grammar, indentation, auto-this and auto-that. If you're good, those things just get in the way.
I am tempted to try this for my own writing; the only thing I'd want to figure out is a sane way to get files off of it without having to resurrect a floppy drive.
I was amazed when I saw this Years ago.
Now that I think about it, seems like a good choice since it allows him to focus, that machine has no multitasking = no distractions, internet...
Oh, okay. Never mind the fact that the first thing you'd read if you open the linked Twitter profile (@GeorgeRRMartin_) is
> Not affiliated with GRRM
Let's not mention that Googling his Social Media habits would reveal a blog post mentioning he doesn't use Twitter or Facebook[1]. Heck, you can even read that on his Wikipedia article.
Is it just me, or is the amount of basic fact-checking being done by TechCrunch (and others) basically nil?
[+] [-] kayfox|12 years ago|reply
When your creatively writing or drawing its critical that your tools stay out of the way. Good writing and drawing programs do this, poor ones bog you down in administrivia, formatting, correcting, and the like.
This does mean things like having control, and many word processors these days dont allow the control needed. I also see this trend in many programs these days where the program seems to think that it has a better idea of how you want something done than you. When you get into a fight with one of these programs it can really burn up the idea you had in your head and then your stuck trying to find it again.
So, yeah, artists and writers sometimes use older things because they are better in that way.
[+] [-] Jtsummers|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kryptiskt|12 years ago|reply
[1] http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/01/14/130114fa_fact_...
[+] [-] DanBC|12 years ago|reply
(Apparently Edlin is still available in Windows8, though requires 16 bit support).
[+] [-] donniezazen|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] davycro|12 years ago|reply
[1] http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/04/cormac-mccarthy...
[2] http://www.broadwayworld.com/article/John-Kennedy-Tooles-A-C...
[+] [-] pjbrunet|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mncolinlee|12 years ago|reply
I used Norton Commander editor or vim to write documents and found it easier to be creative with a text editor instead of a word processor. If editing what I wrote on the first draft forces me to rearrange line endings, I find that I tend to edit my words less often while creativity is flowing.
[+] [-] DanBC|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] waterlesscloud|12 years ago|reply
Cause there aren't any DOS viruses? Heh. Kids today.
[+] [-] Dirlewanger|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rschmitty|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nols|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lomnakkus|12 years ago|reply
For example, if I'm undertaking a huge refactor which will require a lot of reworking of tests, I'll usually drop down to Emacs (or keep using an IDE, but turn auto-compilation off) just to avoid the extreme amount of mental noise coming from all those compilation errors just sitting there and increasing over time. Sometimes it's better to just willfully ignore all that irrelevant detail for an hour or two, get into the flow and power through while you have the inspiration. Those test errors (compilation or otherwise) can always be fixed later.
[+] [-] mullingitover|12 years ago|reply
[1] http://www.nealstephenson.com/photos.htm
[+] [-] nine_k|12 years ago|reply
On a serious note, whatever tool does not distract you while writing fiction is best. Usually you don't need an IDE for that.
OTOH a saga of that size might benefit from cross-referencing, timeline, etc IDE-like tools. Stephen King is known to employ a special person who checks his works for consistency with previous works in the same universe.
[+] [-] hyborg787|12 years ago|reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxFySrqdi8E
[+] [-] netcan|12 years ago|reply
It might be nice to have a nice light clamshell e-ink writing machine. All it does is write novels.
Anything that helps. For ggrm, I propose we take away any computer that runs any software other than wordstar. Get winds of wi ter written already! I need to know what happens. :)
[+] [-] BMarkmann|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] quaffapint|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|12 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] bigdubs|12 years ago|reply
I am tempted to try this for my own writing; the only thing I'd want to figure out is a sane way to get files off of it without having to resurrect a floppy drive.
[+] [-] saraid216|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] delucain|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sogen|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dang|12 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pfg|12 years ago|reply
Is it just me, or is the amount of basic fact-checking being done by TechCrunch (and others) basically nil?
[1]: http://grrm.livejournal.com/197075.html