top | item 7767376

40th anniversary of the Rubik's Cube

21 points| happyscrappy | 12 years ago |google.com | reply

18 comments

order
[+] antimora|12 years ago|reply
Unfortunately it forcing me to use Chrome, Firefox, or Safari even though I am using the latest Chrome on Ubuntu 13.10. Too bad.
[+] adamors|12 years ago|reply
Ditto, only I'm on Debian. Just updated to 34.0.1847.137
[+] cones688|12 years ago|reply
Same here, Fedora 20 with Chrome v 34.0.1847.137
[+] chiph|12 years ago|reply
Sadly, my original cube from 1980 broke last year. The plastic just gave way on the center rotating "star" and it came apart. :(

I bought a new one, but it's much harder to turn. I think I may have put some Vaseline in the original to lubricate it, but it's been too many years to remember.

I wonder if Dr. Rubik is getting his royalties now that the Soviet Union is gone (The story I heard was that the Soviets kept all the royalties, giving him a relatively generous salary in return).

[+] atom-morgan|12 years ago|reply
I'd recommend a silicone based lubricant. Jig-a-loo works very well. I used to compete, so I've used a few.
[+] peapicker|12 years ago|reply
I still have my 1980's one -- it is pretty beat up.

Seriously, though, buy a DaiYan Guhong or DiaYan Zhanchi speedcube. They are sooo much more enjoyable to use than the official Rubik's cube. (Then again, if you're like me, they will just add to the pile of cubes...)

[+] ExpiredLink|12 years ago|reply
> I wonder if Dr. Rubik is getting his royalties now that the Soviet Union is gone

He is from Hungary. The cube made him a wealthy man even before the iron curtain went down.

[+] outericky|12 years ago|reply
When I was 5, my parents promised me a Rubik's cube if I came along with them and moved to the United States. I never realized it was a fairly new product back then. 40 yrs and still going strong - how many other "toys" have those legs?
[+] aadilrazvi|12 years ago|reply
After solving the cube, it doesn't let you share the completed screenshot...
[+] ctz|12 years ago|reply
window.solveCube() if you want to cheat.
[+] danielweber|12 years ago|reply
TypeError: undefined is not a function