As another commenter here pointed out, it's preferred, not correct. This is the old prescriptivist vs descriptivist debate, as seen among linguists. (Disclaimer: I am not a linguist. I just read Language Log.) If you're fretting about the correct this and the proper that (prepositions at the end of sentences, "whom" instead of "who", and so on), you're a prescriptivist, and you may (note, I said may) be making up rules where no rules are needed. I prefer descriptivism (as in: "nauseous" now means the same thing as "nauseated", which is different from its old meaning of "nausea-making", because that's how it's used).(Edit: "different to" sounded wrong. I could never remember which way that goes.)
thanatropism|11 years ago
Or is "preferred" a "preferred" word, but "correct" is allowable?
dantheta|11 years ago
etfb|11 years ago
To this day, I still can't remember which is correct - "than", "from" or "to". But I can remember the look on his face, and the fact that after that he stuck with slightly less aggravating teaching methods.
cokernel|11 years ago
I believe that "different from" is most common across all dialects of English: http://alt-usage-english.org/excerpts/fxdiffer.html (Note: This only compares UK English and American English, not "all dialects".)
aninhumer|11 years ago
etfb|11 years ago
This is why I long to own a t-shirt bearing the words "Practising Peddant".